Suppr超能文献

比较两种低剂量和高剂量的呋喃唑酮四联疗法在根除方面的效果。

Comparing the Effect of Two Low-dose and High-dose Four-drug Regimens of Furazolidone in Eradicating .

作者信息

Seyedmajidi Mohammad Reza, Hosseini Seyed Ashkan, Vafaeimanesh Jamshid

机构信息

Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology-GRCGH (GOUMS), Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran Clinical Research Development Center, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.

出版信息

Middle East J Dig Dis. 2021 Apr;13(2):131-138. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.216. Epub 2021 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Antibiotic resistance is a major cause of ( ) treatment failures. The increased resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole has reduced the ability of this therapeutic regimen and prompted researchers to look for other drugs. One of the antibiotics of interest in this regard is furazolidone because of its low drug resistance. The aim of this study is compare two-drug regimens including low-dose and high-dose furazolidone in the treatment of METHODS This study is a clinical trial in which the studied subjects were categorized into two groups. The first group underwent treatment with amoxicillin 1000 mg-BD, furazolidone 100 mg-BD, omeprazole 20 mg-BD, and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg-BD for two weeks (low-dose OFAB). The second group received furazolidone 200 mg-BD (high-dose OFAB). Then eight weeks after completion of the treatment, they were examined in terms of eradication via the UBT test. RESULTS 85 participants completed the study in each group. The response to treatment was 76% and 83% in the low and high-dose groups, respectively, based on intention to treat analysis. Based on per protocol analysis the response to treatment was 78% and 84%, respectively, if excluded patients had completed their protocol and had response to treatment, and 72% and 79%, respectively, if excluded patients had completed their protocol and did not have response to treatment ( = 0.298). In the low-dose and high-dose groups, 16.5% and 24.7% of the participants suffered the complications of treatment with furazolidone ( = 0.18), respectively. Three patients in the high-dose group and one in the low-dose group did not complete the treatment because of the medication's bad taste ( = 0.03). CONCLUSION Low doses of furazolidone had a comparable therapeutic effect compared with high doses, but patients experienced significantly lower levels of bad taste, which was a major cause of reluctance to continue treatment. Therefore, we think four-drug low-dose furazolidone treatment is a good choice in eradicating

摘要

背景 抗生素耐药是( )治疗失败的主要原因。对克拉霉素和甲硝唑耐药性的增加降低了这种治疗方案的有效性,并促使研究人员寻找其他药物。在这方面,一种受关注的抗生素是呋喃唑酮,因为其耐药性较低。本研究的目的是比较含低剂量和高剂量呋喃唑酮的两药方案在治疗( )中的效果。方法 本研究是一项临床试验,将研究对象分为两组。第一组接受阿莫西林1000毫克,每日2次;呋喃唑酮100毫克,每日2次;奥美拉唑20毫克,每日2次;枸橼酸铋钾240毫克,每日2次,治疗两周(低剂量OFAB)。第二组接受呋喃唑酮200毫克,每日2次(高剂量OFAB)。然后在治疗完成八周后,通过尿素呼气试验(UBT)检测根除情况。结果 每组85名参与者完成了研究。基于意向性分析,低剂量组和高剂量组的治疗反应分别为76%和83%。基于符合方案分析,如果排除已完成方案且对治疗有反应的患者,治疗反应分别为78%和84%;如果排除已完成方案但对治疗无反应的患者,治疗反应分别为72%和79%(P = 0.298)。在低剂量组和高剂量组中,分别有16.5%和24.7%的参与者出现呋喃唑酮治疗的并发症(P = 0.18)。高剂量组有3名患者、低剂量组有1名患者因药物味道不佳未完成治疗(P = 0.03)。结论 低剂量呋喃唑酮与高剂量相比具有相当的治疗效果,但患者出现的药物味道不佳情况明显较少,而这是不愿继续治疗的主要原因。因此,我们认为低剂量呋喃唑酮四联疗法是根除( )的一个不错选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验