Suppr超能文献

含左氧氟沙星的三联疗法与铋剂四联疗法作为二线抗幽门螺杆菌治疗方案的比较

Levofloxacin-containing triple therapy versus bismuth-based quadruple therapy as regimens for second line anti- Helicobacter pylori.

作者信息

Seyyedmajidi Mohamadreza, Abbasi Laleh, Seyedmajidi Seyedali, Hosseini Seyed Ashkan, Ahmadi Anahita, Hajiebrahimi Shahin, Vafaeimanesh Jamshid

机构信息

Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology-GRCGH (GOUMS), Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.

出版信息

Caspian J Intern Med. 2019 Spring;10(2):211-216. doi: 10.22088/cjim.10.2.211.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence of infection decreased following the hygiene promotion and application of proper anti- H.pylori treatments, unfortunately gradual increase is reported in treatment failure; hence, application of a proper treatment regimen as a second-line therapy is of great importance.

METHODS

In the current randomized, clinical trial, a total of 120 patients with peptic ulcers who failed to respond to treatment were enrolled. In the OLA group, a regimen of omeprazole 40 mg/day, levofloxacin 1 g/day, and amoxicillin 2 g/ day was prescribed; however, a regimen of omeprazole 40 mg/day, bismuth sub-citrate 480 mg/day, furazolidone 400 mg/day, and amoxicillin 2 g/day was administered to the OFAB group. Both groups were treated for 2 weeks, and 6 weeks after the treatment, the urea breath test (UBT) was performed in the subjects. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS Version 18. At the end, 58 patients in group OLA and 57 patients in the OFAB group were analyzed.

RESULTS

According to the results of the current study, 96.7% of the subjects in the OLA and 95% in the OFAB groups completed the treatment course and the eradication rates were 86.7% and 78.3% in the OLA and OFAB groups, respectively (P=0.23). Treatment side effects were observed in 51.7% and 11.7% of the subjects in the OLA and OFAB groups, respectively (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Both regimens were applicable as the second-line therapy due to insignificant difference between the results of the 2 groups; however, OLA regimen was superior to OFAB, due to lower side effects.

摘要

背景

尽管在促进卫生和应用适当的抗幽门螺杆菌治疗后感染率有所下降,但遗憾的是,治疗失败率却逐渐上升;因此,应用适当的治疗方案作为二线治疗非常重要。

方法

在当前的随机临床试验中,共纳入了120例治疗无效的消化性溃疡患者。在OLA组中,规定的治疗方案为奥美拉唑40毫克/天、左氧氟沙星1克/天和阿莫西林2克/天;然而,OFAB组采用的治疗方案为奥美拉唑40毫克/天、枸橼酸铋钾480毫克/天、呋喃唑酮400毫克/天和阿莫西林2克/天。两组均治疗2周,治疗后6周,对受试者进行尿素呼气试验(UBT)。收集的数据用SPSS 18版进行分析。最后,对OLA组的58例患者和OFAB组的57例患者进行了分析。

结果

根据本研究结果,OLA组96.7%的受试者和OFAB组95%的受试者完成了治疗疗程,OLA组和OFAB组的根除率分别为86.7%和78.3%(P=0.23)。OLA组和OFAB组分别有51.7%和11.7%的受试者出现治疗副作用(P<0.01)。

结论

由于两组结果差异不显著,两种治疗方案均可作为二线治疗;然而,OLA方案因副作用较低而优于OFAB方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3930/6619475/876a1764c0a1/cjim-10-211-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验