ZESBO - Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße. 20 Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2022 Sep;23(3):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s10561-021-09969-x. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Our study aimed to asses the defatting efficiency of different methods, which are commonly used and easily available in the laboratory in order to find a method that is effective, convenient, safe, and economical. Cylindrical cancellous bone specimens were obtained from fresh-frozen human cadaver femoral condyles, cut into multiple small specimens (Ø8 × 2 mm), and assigned to two groups that were treated with either chemical solvent soaking (Solvent group) or ultrasonic cleaning (Ultrasound group). Each group was divided into several subgroups based on different treatments. Digital photographs were taken of each specimen. The difference of material density (Δρ), apparent density (Δρ), and porosity (ΔP) before and after treatment were used as evaluation indicators. For the solvent group, in Δρ, only the combination of 99% ethanol and detergent solution showed a significant difference before and after treatment (P = 0.00). There was no significant difference in ΔP among acetone, the mixture of 99% ethanol and acetone, and the combination of 99% ethanol and detergent solution (P = 0.93). For the ultrasound group, the median of all subgroups in Δρ and ΔP were all lower than the solvent group. The combination of 99% ethanol and detergent solution (v/v = 1:20), as well as the mixture of 99% ethanol and acetone (v/v = 1:1), seem to be the optimal defatting methods for 2 mm thick cancellous bone slices due to their effectiveness, availability, low-cost and safety. Chemical soaking for 24 h is more effective than ultrasonic cleaning with 99% ethanol or acetone for 20 or 40 min.
我们的研究旨在评估不同方法的脱脂效率,这些方法在实验室中常用且易于获得,以找到一种有效、方便、安全且经济的方法。从新鲜冷冻的人尸股骨髁中获得圆柱形松质骨标本,切成多个小标本(Ø8 × 2 毫米),并分为两组,分别用化学溶剂浸泡(溶剂组)或超声清洗(超声组)处理。每组根据不同的处理方法进一步分为几个亚组。对每个标本拍摄数字照片。处理前后材料密度(Δρ)、表观密度(Δρ)和孔隙率(ΔP)的差异用作评估指标。对于溶剂组,在Δρ 中,只有 99%乙醇和洗涤剂溶液的组合在处理前后有显著差异(P = 0.00)。丙酮、99%乙醇和丙酮的混合物以及 99%乙醇和洗涤剂溶液的组合(P = 0.93)之间的ΔP 无显著差异。对于超声组,所有亚组的Δρ 和ΔP 的中位数均低于溶剂组。由于其有效性、可用性、低成本和安全性,99%乙醇和洗涤剂溶液(v/v = 1:20)的组合以及 99%乙醇和丙酮的混合物(v/v = 1:1)似乎是 2 毫米厚的松质骨切片的最佳脱脂方法。化学浸泡 24 小时比用 99%乙醇或丙酮超声清洗 20 或 40 分钟更有效。