• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格障碍中的亲社会行为:现状与研究议程。

Prosociality in personality disorders: Status quo and research agenda.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.013
PMID:34715541
Abstract

Personality disorders (PDs) are characterized by interpersonal dysfunction and deficits in prosociality are theorized to contribute to this. We review studies linking categorical PDs to prosocial and antagonistic traits and highlight studies that assessed prosocial behavior in PDs via economic games. We structure our review based on the recently proposed affordance framework of prosocial behavior, summarizing the evidence for exploitation, reciprocity, temporal conflict, and dependence under uncertainty as situational affordances that allow the expression of personality in prosocial behavior. We conclude that some of the inconsistencies in the literature may be due to studies focusing on different situational affordances and the reliance on categorical PDs. We suggest a research agenda and a set of testable hypotheses based on maladaptive personality traits included in the newly implemented dimensional PD diagnoses in ICD-11 and DSM-5.

摘要

人格障碍(PDs)的特征是人际关系功能障碍,而亲社会缺陷理论上与之相关。我们回顾了将分类 PDs 与亲社会和敌对特征联系起来的研究,并强调了通过经济游戏评估 PDs 中亲社会行为的研究。我们根据最近提出的亲社会行为的可供性框架来组织综述,总结了在不确定条件下剥削、互惠、时间冲突和依赖作为情境可供性的证据,这些可供性允许个性在亲社会行为中表现出来。我们得出结论,文献中的一些不一致可能是由于研究关注不同的情境可供性以及对分类 PDs 的依赖。我们基于 ICD-11 和 DSM-5 中实施的新维度 PD 诊断中包含的适应不良人格特征,提出了一个研究议程和一组可检验的假设。

相似文献

1
Prosociality in personality disorders: Status quo and research agenda.人格障碍中的亲社会行为:现状与研究议程。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
[The classification of personality disorders in ICD-11].[《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍分类]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2021 Nov;49(6):480-485. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000747. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Validating the German version of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale using nominal response models.使用名义反应模型验证人格障碍严重程度-国际疾病分类第11版量表的德文版本。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Mar;35(3):257-268. doi: 10.1037/pas0001199. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
6
Further validation of the Personality Disorder Severity for ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale in a community mental health sample.进一步验证《国际疾病分类第 11 版人格障碍严重程度量表》(PDS-ICD-11)在社区心理健康样本中的适用性。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Aug;35(8):706-714. doi: 10.1037/pas0001253. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Childhood Traumatic Experiences and Dimensional Models of Personality Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Opportunities and Challenges.童年创伤经历与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版及《国际疾病分类》第11版中的人格障碍维度模型:机遇与挑战
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Jul 19;23(9):60. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01265-5.
8
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.人格与亲社会行为:理论框架与元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Jan;146(1):30-90. doi: 10.1037/bul0000217.
9
Cross-system concordance of personality disorder diagnoses of DSM-IV and diagnostic criteria for research of ICD-10.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍诊断与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)研究用诊断标准的跨系统一致性
J Pers Disord. 2002 Jun;16(3):283-92. doi: 10.1521/pedi.16.3.283.22537.
10
[Categorical versus dimensional classification of personality disorders: are dimensional models the future?].[人格障碍的分类与维度分类:维度模型是未来的方向吗?]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2006 Dec;74(12):706-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915593.

引用本文的文献

1
Cooperative decision-making in borderline personality disorder: insights from a preregistered study using a comprehensive economic task battery.边缘型人格障碍中的合作决策:一项使用综合经济任务组的预注册研究的见解
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 Jun 17;12(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00295-2.
2
Maladaptive personality traits as predictors of prosocial and trusting behavior in two economic games.不良适应型人格特质作为两种经济博弈中亲社会行为和信任行为的预测指标
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2022 Nov 10;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00201-0.
3
"Self" and "other": A conceptual bridge linking normal with pathological personality.
“自我”与“他者”:一座连接正常与病理性人格的概念桥梁。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 20;13:1023236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1023236. eCollection 2022.