• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估新兴威胁和应急响应的危害和风险的进展:比较 3 个联邦机构的努力。

Advances in Assessing Hazard and Risk to Emerging Threats and Emergency Response: Comparing and Contrasting Efforts of 3 Federal Agencies.

机构信息

Office of the Associate Director of Science, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Hazardous Materials Team, Office of Emergency Management, Office of the Associate Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Sci. 2021 Dec 28;185(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab126.

DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfab126
PMID:34718822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9041561/
Abstract

Federal statutes authorize several agencies to protect human populations from chemical emergencies and provide guidance to evacuate, clean, and reoccupy affected areas. Each of the authorized federal agencies has developed programs to provide managers, public health officials, and regulators, with a rapid assessment of potential hazards and risks associated with chemical emergencies. Emergency responses vary based on exposure scenarios, routes, temporal considerations, and the substance(s) present. Traditional chemical assessments and derivation of toxicity values are time-intensive, typically requiring large amounts of human epidemiological and experimental animal data. When a rapid assessment of health effects is needed, an integrated computational approach of augmenting extant toxicity data with in vitro (new alternative toxicity testing methods) data can provide a quick, evidence-based solution. In so doing, multiple streams of data can be used, including literature searches, hazard, dose-response, physicochemical, environmental fate, transport property data, in vitro cell bioactivity testing, and toxicogenomics. The field of toxicology is moving, towards increased use of this approach as it transforms from observational to predictive science. The challenge is to objectively and transparently derive toxicity values using this approach to protect human health and the environment. Presented here are examples and efforts toward rapid risk assessment that demonstrate unified, parallel, and complementary work to provide timely protection in times of chemical emergency.

摘要

联邦法规授权多个机构保护人类免受化学紧急情况的影响,并提供指导以疏散、清理和重新占领受影响的地区。每个授权的联邦机构都制定了计划,为管理人员、公共卫生官员和监管机构提供了对与化学紧急情况相关的潜在危害和风险的快速评估。应急响应因暴露场景、途径、时间考虑因素和存在的物质而异。传统的化学评估和毒性值推导需要大量的人类流行病学和实验动物数据,因此时间密集。当需要快速评估健康影响时,用体外(新的替代毒性测试方法)数据增强现有毒性数据的综合计算方法可以提供快速、基于证据的解决方案。在这样做时,可以使用多数据流,包括文献检索、危害、剂量反应、物理化学、环境命运、传输特性数据、体外细胞生物活性测试和毒理学基因组学。毒理学领域正在朝着增加使用这种方法的方向发展,因为它正在从观察科学向预测科学转变。挑战是使用这种方法客观透明地推导毒性值,以保护人类健康和环境。这里介绍的是快速风险评估的示例和努力,这些示例和努力展示了在化学紧急情况下提供及时保护的统一、并行和互补工作。

相似文献

1
Advances in Assessing Hazard and Risk to Emerging Threats and Emergency Response: Comparing and Contrasting Efforts of 3 Federal Agencies.评估新兴威胁和应急响应的危害和风险的进展:比较 3 个联邦机构的努力。
Toxicol Sci. 2021 Dec 28;185(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab126.
2
Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.从美国环境保护局综合毒性化学品仪表板获取化学性质和危害数据:人类风险评估实用指南。
Environ Int. 2021 Sep;154:106566. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106566. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
3
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
4
A look at state-level risk assessment in the United States: making decisions in the absence of federal risk values.审视美国州一级的风险评估:在缺乏联邦风险值的情况下做出决策。
Risk Anal. 2013 Jan;33(1):54-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01842.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
5
Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.美国环保署实施的计算毒理学:为筛选和评估化学暴露、危害和风险提供高通量决策支持工具。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2010 Feb;13(2-4):197-217. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483935.
6
FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children.未来毒理学IV研讨会总结:健康儿童的预测毒理学
Toxicol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;180(2):198-211. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab013.
7
New Toxicology Tools and the Emerging Paradigm Shift in Environmental Health Decision-Making.新的毒理学工具与环境健康决策中的新兴范式转变。
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Dec;127(12):125002. doi: 10.1289/EHP4745. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.用于评估基因组损伤的下一代检测策略:一个概念框架及考量因素
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
9
Elucidating environmental dimensions of neurological disorders and disease: Understanding new tools from federal chemical testing programs.阐明神经紊乱和疾病的环境维度:从联邦化学测试计划中了解新工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Sep 1;593-594:634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
The Opioid Epidemic: Moving Toward an Integrated, Holistic Analytical Response.阿片类药物流行:迈向综合、全面的分析应对措施。
J Anal Toxicol. 2019 Jan 1;43(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/jat/bky049.

引用本文的文献

1
Cutting-edge computational chemical exposure research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.美国环保署的前沿计算化学暴露研究。
Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:108097. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108097. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Principles and Procedures for Assessment of Acute Toxicity Incorporating Methods.包含多种方法的急性毒性评估原则与程序
Comput Toxicol. 2022 Nov;24. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100237. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Toxidrome Recognition in Chemical-Weapons Attacks.化学武器袭击中的中毒综合征识别
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1611-1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1705224.
2
Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment.加速化学风险评估步伐。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2018 May 21;31(5):287-290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00339. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches .非动物方法预测皮肤致敏性(二):已定义方法的评估。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 May;48(5):359-374. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429386. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Toward development of occupational exposure levels for insensitive munition components.
Toxicol Ind Health. 2018 Jan;34(1):1. doi: 10.1177/0748233717739800.
5
QSAR models of human data can enrich or replace LLNA testing for human skin sensitization.人类数据的定量构效关系(QSAR)模型可以丰富或替代用于人类皮肤致敏性的局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)。
Green Chem. 2016 Dec 21;18(24):6501-6515. doi: 10.1039/C6GC01836J. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
Novel transcriptome assembly and comparative toxicity pathway analysis in mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus) embryos and larvae exposed to Deepwater Horizon oil.新型转录组组装与深水地平线石油暴露条件下鲯鳅胚胎和幼鱼的比较毒性通路分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 15;7:44546. doi: 10.1038/srep44546.
7
The toxicity of crude 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (MCHM): review of experimental data and results of predictive models for its constituents and a putative metabolite.粗 4-甲基环己烷甲醇(MCHM)的毒性:对其成分和一种假定代谢物的实验数据和预测模型结果的综述。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2015;45 Suppl 2:1-55. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2015.1076376.
8
Toxicity Assessment of 4-Methyl-1-cyclohexanemethanol and Its Metabolites in Response to a Recent Chemical Spill in West Virginia, USA.4-甲基-1-环己烷甲醇及其代谢产物对美国西弗吉尼亚州近期化学品泄漏事件的毒性评估
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 19;49(10):6284-93. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00371. Epub 2015 May 11.
9
Assimilation of oil-derived elements by oysters due to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.由于深水地平线石油泄漏,牡蛎对石油衍生元素的吸收。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Dec 4;46(23):12787-95. doi: 10.1021/es302369h. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
Analysis of eight oil spill dispersants using rapid, in vitro tests for endocrine and other biological activity.利用快速的体外测试方法分析八种溢油分散剂的内分泌和其他生物活性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 1;44(15):5979-85. doi: 10.1021/es102150z.