• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性全髋关节置换二期翻修中个体化大间隔器——2年后的临床和功能结果:个体化金属内骨骼骨水泥间隔器(iMECS)

[Individual megaspacers in two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty-clinical and functional results after 2 years : Individual metal-endoskeleton cement spacer (iMECS)].

作者信息

Ellenrieder Martin, Surmann Bastian, Enz Andreas, Toch Sören Henning, Lenz Robert, Mittelmeier Wolfram

机构信息

Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.

Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften/AG 5 Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitsmanagement, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Deutschland.

出版信息

Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;51(7):564-572. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04185-7. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00132-021-04185-7
PMID:34718833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556826/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large femoral defects in late periprosthetic infection (PPI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) often require the use of large, individual metal endoskeleton-reinforced cement spacers (iMECS).

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to record the clinical, radiological and functional results (Harris Hip Score HHS) up to the 2 years after treatment of a PPI using an iMECS. Major patient-specific parameters were to be evaluated with regard to the treatment outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The collective of this single-center retrospective cohort study comprised 29 patients. The mean follow-up was 24.4 months (range: 23.0 to 27.6 months). The absence of infection after endoprosthetic hip joint reconstruction was rated as successful treatment. The two patient groups (successful (S)/not successful (nS)) were compared with regard to gender distribution, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the number of previous septic changes, and the rate of polymicrobial and difficult-to-treat infections.

RESULTS

The average CCI in the total collective was 6.4 points. Joint reconstruction was possible in 23 of 29 patients (79%); 2 years after PPI treatment 4 patients were not available for a follow-up examination (2 deceased, 2 unable to participate). At the time of the follow-up, 17 of the 29 patients had received a joint reconstruction and were free of infection, with an average HHS of 75 points. There were no iMECS-associated complications requiring revision. Only the initial CCI (S: 4.1 points; nS: 9.7 points) differed significantly between the patient groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of large femoral defects, iMECS provide secure temporary stabilization. The chance of a successful joint reconstruction is closely related to the individual comorbidities profile.

摘要

背景

全髋关节置换术(THA)后晚期假体周围感染(PPI)中的大股骨缺损通常需要使用大型个体化金属内骨骼增强骨水泥间隔物(iMECS)。

目的

本研究旨在记录使用iMECS治疗PPI后长达2年的临床、放射学和功能结果(Harris髋关节评分HHS)。主要的患者特异性参数将根据治疗结果进行评估。

材料与方法

本单中心回顾性队列研究共纳入29例患者。平均随访时间为24.4个月(范围:23.0至27.6个月)。人工髋关节置换术后无感染被评为治疗成功。比较两组患者(成功(S)/未成功(nS))的性别分布、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、既往感染性病变的数量以及多微生物感染和难治性感染的发生率。

结果

整个队列的平均CCI为6.4分。29例患者中有23例(79%)可行关节重建;PPI治疗2年后,4例患者无法进行随访检查(2例死亡,2例无法参与)。随访时,29例患者中有17例接受了关节重建且无感染,平均HHS为75分。未出现需要翻修的iMECS相关并发症。仅患者组之间的初始CCI存在显著差异(S组:4.1分;nS组:9.7分)(p < 0.05)。

结论

对于大股骨缺损,iMECS可提供可靠的临时稳定。关节重建成功的机会与个体合并症情况密切相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/712306d4d0d3/132_2021_4185_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/82bdc5932b2a/132_2021_4185_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/b606d262f8ca/132_2021_4185_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/712306d4d0d3/132_2021_4185_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/82bdc5932b2a/132_2021_4185_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/b606d262f8ca/132_2021_4185_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78a/8556826/712306d4d0d3/132_2021_4185_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Individual megaspacers in two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty-clinical and functional results after 2 years : Individual metal-endoskeleton cement spacer (iMECS)].感染性全髋关节置换二期翻修中个体化大间隔器——2年后的临床和功能结果:个体化金属内骨骼骨水泥间隔器(iMECS)
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;51(7):564-572. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04185-7. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
[The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients].[模块化通用肿瘤与翻修系统(MUTARS®)在下肢假体翻修手术中的作用——25例患者的结果分析]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2017 Feb;155(1):61-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114704. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
[Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection of the Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Two Methods].[全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染的两阶段翻修术:两种方法的比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(3):179-185.
4
Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Specific Articulating Antibiotic Spacer Design: Reliable Periprosthetic Joint Infection Eradication and Functional Improvement.两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术结合特定活动型抗生素间隔物设计:可靠的假体周围关节感染清除和功能改善。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3746-3753. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
5
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.间隔物设计对两阶段翻修髋关节置换术并发症发生率的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
Destination Joint Spacers: A Similar Infection-Relief Rate But Higher Complication Rate Compared with Two-Stage Revision.目的关节间隔物:与两阶段翻修相比,具有相似的感染缓解率但并发症发生率更高。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):884-891. doi: 10.1111/os.12996. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.在两阶段全髋关节置换术翻修治疗感染过程中,对特定患者进行单阶段髋臼翻修是有效的。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5334-5. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
8
Total hip arthroplasty for destructive septic arthritis of the hip using a two-stage protocol without spacer placement.髋关节置换术治疗髋关节破坏性化脓性关节炎的两阶段方案,不使用间隔器。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03981-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Retained Antibiotic Spacers After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Resections: High Complication Rates.髋关节和膝关节置换术后遗留抗生素药盒:高并发症发生率。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3510-3518. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.053. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
10
Low Reinfection Rates But a High Rate of Complications in THA for Infection Sequelae in Childhood: A Systematic Review.儿童感染后遗症行全髋关节置换术的再感染率低但并发症发生率高:一项系统评价
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):1094-1108. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001607.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving outcomes in acute and chronic periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection with a multidisciplinary approach.采用多学科方法改善急性和慢性人工髋关节和膝关节周围感染的治疗效果。
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Jul;2(7):509-514. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0064.R1.
2
[Manual addition of antibiotics to industrial bone cement mixes : Investigations of the dry mix in the cement cartridge during manual admixture to polymer-active substance mixtures].[在工业骨水泥混合物中手动添加抗生素:在将聚合物活性物质混合物手动掺入水泥筒过程中对干混物的研究]
Orthopade. 2022 Jan;51(1):44-51. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04115-7. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Management of Modular Mega-Implant Infection of the Lower Extremity.
下肢模块化大型植入物感染的处理。
Z Orthop Unfall. 2022 Jun;160(3):317-323. doi: 10.1055/a-1340-0890. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Current actual success rate of the two-stage exchange arthroplasty strategy in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection.两阶段髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修策略的当前实际成功率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Dec;102-B(12):1682-1688. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0792.R1.
5
Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique.通过将微生物学结果与经微创穿刺技术获取的组织病理学样本相结合提高人工关节周围感染的诊断确定性
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 20;9(10):3364. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103364.
6
[Periprosthetic joint infections : Latest developments, strategies and treatment algorithms].[人工关节周围感染:最新进展、策略及治疗方案]
Orthopade. 2020 Aug;49(8):648-659. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03950-4.
7
[Implant-associated joint infections].[植入物相关关节感染]
Orthopade. 2020 Mar;49(3):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03877-w.
8
Hip Spacers in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Literature.人工关节周围感染二期翻修术中的髋关节间隔物:文献综述
Joints. 2019 Oct 11;7(2):56-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697608. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
The worst-case scenario: treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture with coexistent periprosthetic infection-a prospective and consecutive clinical study.最坏情况:合并假体周围感染的股骨假体周围骨折的治疗-前瞻性连续临床研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Oct;139(10):1461-1470. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03263-y. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
10
Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook.人工关节周围感染:当前概念与展望
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 29;4(7):482-494. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092. eCollection 2019 Jul.