• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人为因素驱动鸟类群落从局地到区域尺度的更替。

Anthropogenic drivers of avian community turnover from local to regional scales.

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Environment, Ecology, and Energy Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Feb;28(3):770-781. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15967. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.15967
PMID:34719080
Abstract

Anthropogenic change has altered the composition and function of ecological communities across the globe. As a result, there is a need for studies examining observed community compositional change and determining whether and how anthropogenic change drivers may be influencing that turnover. In particular, it is also important to determine to what extent community turnover is idiosyncratic or if turnover can be explained by predictable responses across species based on traits or niche characteristics. Here, we measured turnover in avian communities across North America from 1990 to 2016 in the Breeding Bird Survey using an ordination method, and modeled turnover as a function of land use and climate change drivers from local to regional scales. We also examined how turnover may be attributed to species groups, including foraging guilds, trophic groups, migratory distance, and breeding biomes. We found that at local scales, land use change explained a greater proportion of variance in turnover than climate change variables, while as scale increased, trends in temperature explained a greater proportion of variance in turnover. We also found across the study region, turnover could be attributed to one of a handful of species undergoing strong expansions or strong declines over the study time period. We did not observe consistent patterns in compositional change in any trait groups we examined except for those that included previously identified highly influential species. Our results have two important implications: First, the relative importance of different anthropogenic change drivers may vary with scale, which should be considered in studies' modeling impacts of global change on biodiversity. Second, in North American avian communities, individual species undergoing large shifts in population may drive signals in compositional change, and composite community turnover metrics should be carefully selected as a result.

摘要

人为因素的改变已经改变了全球生态群落的组成和功能。因此,需要研究观察到的群落组成变化,并确定人为变化驱动因素是否以及如何影响这种变化。特别是,确定群落变化在多大程度上是特殊的,或者变化是否可以根据物种的特征或生态位特征,通过可预测的反应来解释,这一点也很重要。在这里,我们使用排序方法,在 1990 年至 2016 年的繁殖鸟类调查中测量了北美的鸟类群落的周转率,并将周转率建模为当地到区域尺度的土地利用和气候变化驱动因素的函数。我们还研究了周转率可能归因于哪些物种组,包括觅食群体、营养级群体、迁徙距离和繁殖生物群系。我们发现,在当地尺度上,土地利用变化比气候变化变量解释了更多的周转率变化,而随着尺度的增加,温度趋势解释了更多的周转率变化。我们还发现,在整个研究区域,周转率可能归因于研究期间经历强烈扩张或强烈下降的少数几种物种之一。除了那些包括以前确定的高度有影响力的物种的特征组外,我们没有观察到任何特征组的组成变化中有一致的模式。我们的研究结果有两个重要的意义:第一,不同人为变化驱动因素的相对重要性可能因尺度而异,这在研究全球变化对生物多样性的影响时应加以考虑。第二,在北美的鸟类群落中,个体物种的种群可能会发生大的变化,从而驱动组成变化的信号,因此应该仔细选择综合群落周转率指标。

相似文献

1
Anthropogenic drivers of avian community turnover from local to regional scales.人为因素驱动鸟类群落从局地到区域尺度的更替。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Feb;28(3):770-781. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15967. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
An empirical test of the relative and combined effects of land-cover and climate change on local colonization and extinction.对土地覆盖和气候变化对局部定居和灭绝的相对和综合影响的实证检验。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Aug;24(8):3849-3861. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14169. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Occupancy trends of overwintering coastal waterbird communities reveal guild-specific patterns of redistribution and shifting reliance on existing protected areas.越冬沿海水鸟群落的占用趋势揭示了特定类群的重新分布模式以及对现有保护区依赖程度的变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Feb;30(2):e17178. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17178.
4
Drivers of climate change impacts on bird communities.气候变化对鸟类群落影响的驱动因素。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):943-54. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12364. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
5
Synergistic effects of climate and land-use change influence broad-scale avian population declines.气候和土地利用变化的协同效应影响了大范围鸟类种群的减少。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 May;25(5):1561-1575. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14571. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Drivers of bird beta diversity in the Western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot are scale dependent: roles of land use, climate, and distance.驱动西高止山脉-斯里兰卡生物多样性热点地区鸟类β多样性的因素具有尺度依赖性:土地利用、气候和距离的作用。
Oecologia. 2020 Aug;193(4):801-809. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04671-3. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
Landscape fragmentation affects responses of avian communities to climate change.景观破碎化会影响鸟类群落对气候变化的响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Aug;21(8):2942-53. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12885. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
Climate change in our backyards: the reshuffling of North America's winter bird communities.后院的气候变化:北美冬季鸟类群落的重新组合。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):572-85. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12740. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
Local species diversity, β-diversity and climate influence the regional stability of bird biomass across North America.本地物种多样性、β 多样性和气候影响了整个北美的鸟类生物量的区域稳定性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;287(1922):20192520. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2520. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
10
Harmonizing spatial scales and ecological theories to predict avian richness and functional diversity within forest ecosystems.协调空间尺度和生态理论,预测森林生态系统内鸟类丰富度和功能多样性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 28;290(2001):20230742. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0742. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Local colonisations and extinctions of European birds are poorly explained by changes in climate suitability.本地欧洲鸟类的定居和灭绝现象不能仅用气候适宜性变化来解释。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 20;14(1):4304. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39093-1.