• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意差距:从危机管理中的建议到实践。探索在 Cygnus 演习期间“识别出的经验教训”与英国政府对 COVID-19 的应对之间的差距。

Mind the gap: From recommendation to practice in crisis management. Exploring the gap between the "lessons identified" during exercise cygnus and the UK government response to COVID-19.

机构信息

Emergency Planning College, York, United Kingdom. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-082X.

Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-1052.

出版信息

J Emerg Manag. 2021;19(7):133-149. doi: 10.5055/jem.0596.

DOI:10.5055/jem.0596
PMID:34723374
Abstract

The failure to learn lessons from crises is a common observation. The UK Government has been criticized for its response to the COVID-19 crisis. Many critics have highlighted the Government's apparent failure to learn the lessons from Exercise Cygnus, which made recommendations to improve the UK's response to a pandemic. This article compares and contrasts the UK Government's response with the exercise recommendations. It critiques the gaps using current crisis management literature and argues that to avoid future failings, more emphasis is needed on the effectiveness of recommendations from exercises. If this is not done, exercise lessons identified, and their recommendations will not be operationalized. This article argues that the successful transition from policy recommendation to practice requires recommendations to be contextualized, so they are feasible and practical, before they can be institutionalized. It introduces a practical framework and organizational actions on how future exercises can close the gap from lessons identified to be learned and shape practice.

摘要

未能从危机中吸取教训是一个常见的现象。英国政府因应对 COVID-19 危机的方式而受到批评。许多批评者强调,政府显然没有从“天鹅座行动”中吸取教训,该行动提出了改善英国应对大流行的建议。本文比较了英国政府的应对措施与演习建议。它利用当前的危机管理文献来批评这些差距,并认为为了避免未来的失败,需要更加重视演习建议的有效性。如果不这样做,演习中确定的教训及其建议将无法付诸实施。本文认为,要使政策建议成功转化为实践,就需要对建议进行背景化处理,使其具有可行性和实用性,然后才能将其制度化。它介绍了一个实用的框架和组织行动,说明未来的演习如何能够弥合从确定的教训到付诸实践的差距。

相似文献

1
Mind the gap: From recommendation to practice in crisis management. Exploring the gap between the "lessons identified" during exercise cygnus and the UK government response to COVID-19.注意差距:从危机管理中的建议到实践。探索在 Cygnus 演习期间“识别出的经验教训”与英国政府对 COVID-19 的应对之间的差距。
J Emerg Manag. 2021;19(7):133-149. doi: 10.5055/jem.0596.
2
The UK's pandemic preparedness and early response to the COVID-19 pandemic.英国对 COVID-19 大流行的疫情准备和早期应对。
Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan;19(1):2415499. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2024.2415499. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
The Right to Health in Times of Pandemic: What Can We Learn from the UK's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak?大流行时期的健康权:我们能从英国应对 COVID-19 疫情的举措中学到什么?
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):227-241.
4
Young people's experiences of COVID-19 messaging at the start of the UK lockdown: lessons for positive engagement and information sharing.英国封锁初期年轻人对 COVID-19 信息的体验:积极参与和信息共享的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12755-3.
5
COVID-19 Lessons and Post-pandemic Recovery: A Case of Latvia.新冠疫情的经验教训与疫情后复苏:拉脱维亚案例
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;10:866639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.866639. eCollection 2022.
6
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
7
Trust and transparency in times of crisis: Results from an online survey during the first wave (April 2020) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK.信任与透明度在危机时期:英国 COVID-19 疫情第一波(2020 年 4 月)期间在线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0239247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239247. eCollection 2021.
8
Fail to Prepare and you Prepare to Fail: the Human Rights Consequences of the UK Government's Inaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic.不做准备,就准备失败:英国政府在新冠疫情期间不作为的人权后果。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Nov 2;12(4):459-480. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00151-1. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Learning policy lessons from the pandemic: the UK's COVID Inquiry.从疫情中汲取政策教训:英国新冠疫情调查
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;34(1):5-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad222.
10
A qualitative study of the government's engagement of the private health sector in the delivery of Ghana's COVID-19 emergency response.关于政府在加纳新冠疫情应急响应中促使私营卫生部门参与情况的定性研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Dec 18;8(Suppl 5):e014217. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing a social identity perspective on interoperability in the emergency services: Evidence from the Pandemic Multi-Agency Response Teams during the UK COVID-19 response.推进应急服务中互操作性的社会认同视角:来自英国新冠疫情应对期间大流行多机构响应团队的证据。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jul;77:103101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103101. Epub 2022 Jun 9.