• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)病毒感染患者的基础护理:“COVID-NURSE”混合方法调查关于护士护理缺失经历及护理障碍的结果

Fundamental nursing care in patients with the SARS-CoV-2 virus: results from the 'COVID-NURSE' mixed methods survey into nurses' experiences of missed care and barriers to care.

作者信息

Sugg Holly V R, Russell Anne-Marie, Morgan Leila M, Iles-Smith Heather, Richards David A, Morley Naomi, Burnett Sarah, Cockcroft Emma J, Thompson Coon Jo, Cruickshank Susanne, Doris Faye E, Hunt Harriet A, Kent Merryn, Logan Philippa A, Rafferty Anne Marie, Shepherd Maggie H, Singh Sally J, Tooze Susannah J, Whear Rebecca

机构信息

College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Allerton Building, Frederick Rd, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 1;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00746-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-021-00746-5
PMID:34724949
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8558545/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience of nursing care is associated with safety, care quality, treatment outcomes, costs and service use. Effective nursing care includes meeting patients' fundamental physical, relational and psychosocial needs, which may be compromised by the challenges of SARS-CoV-2. No evidence-based nursing guidelines exist for patients with SARS-CoV-2. We report work to develop such a guideline. Our aim was to identify views and experiences of nursing staff on necessary nursing care for inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 (not invasively ventilated) that is omitted or delayed (missed care) and any barriers to this care.

METHODS

We conducted an online mixed methods survey structured according to the Fundamentals of Care Framework. We recruited a convenience sample of UK-based nursing staff who had nursed inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 not invasively ventilated. We asked respondents to rate how well they were able to meet the needs of SARS-CoV-2 patients, compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 patients, in 15 care categories; select from a list of barriers to care; and describe examples of missed care and barriers to care. We analysed quantitative data descriptively and qualitative data using Framework Analysis, integrating data in side-by-side comparison tables.

RESULTS

Of 1062 respondents, the majority rated mobility, talking and listening, non-verbal communication, communicating with significant others, and emotional wellbeing as worse for patients with SARS-CoV-2. Eight barriers were ranked within the top five in at least one of the three care areas. These were (in rank order): wearing Personal Protective Equipment, the severity of patients' conditions, inability to take items in and out of isolation rooms without donning and doffing Personal Protective Equipment, lack of time to spend with patients, lack of presence from specialised services e.g. physiotherapists, lack of knowledge about SARS-CoV-2, insufficient stock, and reluctance to spend time with patients for fear of catching SARS-CoV-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our respondents identified nursing care areas likely to be missed for patients with SARS-CoV-2, and barriers to delivering care. We are currently evaluating a guideline of nursing strategies to address these barriers, which are unlikely to be exclusive to this pandemic or the environments represented by our respondents. Our results should, therefore, be incorporated into global pandemic planning.

摘要

背景

患者的护理体验与安全、护理质量、治疗结果、成本及服务利用相关。有效的护理包括满足患者基本的身体、人际关系及心理社会需求,而这些需求可能因新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)带来的挑战而受到影响。目前尚无针对感染SARS-CoV-2患者的循证护理指南。我们报告了制定此类指南的相关工作。我们的目的是确定护理人员对感染SARS-CoV-2(非侵入性通气)住院患者必要护理的看法和体验,这些护理被遗漏或延迟(护理缺失)以及实施此类护理的任何障碍。

方法

我们根据护理基本框架进行了一项在线混合方法调查。我们招募了一个便利样本,即曾护理过非侵入性通气的感染SARS-CoV-2住院患者的英国护理人员。我们要求受访者对他们在15个护理类别中满足SARS-CoV-2患者需求的能力与非SARS-CoV-2患者相比进行评分;从护理障碍列表中进行选择;并描述护理缺失及护理障碍的示例。我们对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据使用框架分析法,将数据整合到并排比较表中。

结果

在1062名受访者中,大多数人认为SARS-CoV-2患者在活动能力、交谈与倾听、非语言沟通、与重要他人沟通以及情绪健康方面情况较差。在三个护理领域中至少有一个领域,八个障碍被排在前五位。这些障碍(按排名顺序)为:穿戴个人防护装备、患者病情严重程度、不穿戴和脱下个人防护装备就无法将物品带入和带出隔离病房、缺乏与患者相处的时间、缺乏专科服务(如物理治疗师)的参与、对SARS-CoV-2缺乏了解、库存不足以及因害怕感染SARS-CoV-2而不愿与患者相处。

结论

我们的受访者确定了感染SARS-CoV-2患者可能被遗漏的护理领域以及提供护理的障碍。我们目前正在评估一项护理策略指南,以解决这些障碍,这些障碍不太可能仅局限于此次大流行或我们受访者所代表的环境。因此应将我们的结果纳入全球大流行规划中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/f67e6affc557/12912_2021_746_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/835dd4b848b3/12912_2021_746_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/a35da1ed2b91/12912_2021_746_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/f67e6affc557/12912_2021_746_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/835dd4b848b3/12912_2021_746_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/a35da1ed2b91/12912_2021_746_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a63/8559362/f67e6affc557/12912_2021_746_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fundamental nursing care in patients with the SARS-CoV-2 virus: results from the 'COVID-NURSE' mixed methods survey into nurses' experiences of missed care and barriers to care.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)病毒感染患者的基础护理:“COVID-NURSE”混合方法调查关于护士护理缺失经历及护理障碍的结果
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 1;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00746-5.
2
Nurses' strategies for overcoming barriers to fundamental nursing care in patients with COVID-19 caused by infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus: Results from the 'COVID-NURSE' survey.护士在应对 SARS-COV-2 病毒感染所致 COVID-19 患者基本护理障碍的策略:“COVID-NURSE”调查结果。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Mar;79(3):1003-1017. doi: 10.1111/jan.15261. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
COVID-NURSE: evaluation of a fundamental nursing care protocol compared with care as usual on experience of care for noninvasively ventilated patients in hospital with the SARS-CoV-2 virus-protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.COVID-NURSE:一项关于基础护理方案与常规护理对比的评估,该评估针对感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型的住院无创通气患者的护理体验——一项整群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 26;11(5):e046436. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046436.
4
Care-home Nurses' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: Managing ethical conundrums at personal cost: A qualitative study.养老院护士对 COVID-19 大流行的反应:以个人代价应对伦理困境:一项定性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):226-238. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12855. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
5
Impact of COVID-19 and other infectious conditions requiring isolation on the provision of and adaptations to fundamental nursing care in hospital in terms of overall patient experience, care quality, functional ability, and treatment outcomes: systematic review.COVID-19 及其他需要隔离的传染病对医院基础护理的提供和调整对总体患者体验、护理质量、功能能力和治疗结果的影响:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jan;78(1):78-108. doi: 10.1111/jan.15047. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
The impact of redeployment during COVID-19 on nurse well-being, performance and retention: a mixed-methods study (REDEPLOY).COVID-19 期间人员调配对护士福祉、绩效和留任意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究(REDEPLOY)
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(17):1-50. doi: 10.3310/EWPE7103.
8
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
9
Juxtaposing Nurses' and Patients' Perspectives of Missed Nursing Care: A Descriptive Mixed Method Design.并列护士与患者对护理缺失的看法:一项描述性混合方法设计
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2657-2671. doi: 10.1111/jan.16476. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
10
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员遵守呼吸道传染病感染预防与控制(IPC)指南的障碍与促进因素:一项快速定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of nurses' and midwives' stress of conscience with hospital ethical climate and moral sensitivity.护士和助产士的良心压力与医院伦理氛围及道德敏感性的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02180-y.
2
Nursing care for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in light of Fundamental Care.基于基础护理的新型冠状病毒肺炎住院患者护理
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Apr 28;78(2):e20240075. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0075. eCollection 2025.
3
Codesigning a Nursing Leadership Program to Transform Value and Delivery Systems for Fundamental Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological stress of ICU nurses in the time of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间重症监护室护士的心理压力
Crit Care. 2020 May 6;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02926-2.
2
Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019.与 COVID-19 暴露的医护人员心理健康结果相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976.
3
The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review.护士人力配置与护理遗漏的关联:系统评价。
共同设计一个护理领导力项目,以转变基础护理的价值和服务体系。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Aug 31;2023:1318377. doi: 10.1155/2023/1318377. eCollection 2023.
4
The Fundamentals of Care in Practice: A Qualitative Contextual Inquiry.实践中的护理基础:一项质性情境探究
Nurs Inq. 2025 Apr;32(2):e70000. doi: 10.1111/nin.70000.
5
Cancer nurses' experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Multicenter mixed-methods study on coping and resilience strategies.癌症护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历:关于应对和复原力策略的多中心混合方法研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 23;23(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02085-7.
6
Unfinished nursing care in healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健环境中的未完成护理:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10708-7.
7
The ILC Maine statement: Time for the fundamental care [r]evolution.缅因州独立生活中心声明:是时候进行基本护理革命了。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan;81(1):523-536. doi: 10.1111/jan.16108. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
The role of the nursing coordinator and the leadership style in the Italian healthcare organizations.护理协调员和领导风格在意大利医疗机构中的作用。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Dec 5;94(6):e2023266. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i6.15206.
9
Best practices for communication while wearing facemasks: A scoping review.戴口罩时的沟通最佳实践:范围综述。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024 Mar;56(2):227-238. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12939. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
10
Were the unfinished nursing care occurrence, reasons, and consequences different between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients? A systematic review.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者与非COVID-19患者未完成护理的发生率、原因及后果是否存在差异?一项系统评价。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 27;22(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01513-4.
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1474-1487. doi: 10.1111/jan.13564. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
A review of isolation practices and procedures in healthcare settings.医疗机构隔离措施与程序综述。
Br J Nurs. 2018 Feb 8;27(3):137-140. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.3.137.
5
Towards a standardised definition for fundamental care: A modified Delphi study.迈向基础护理标准化定义:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2285-2299. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14247. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
What impact does nursing care left undone have on patient outcomes? Review of the literature.未完成的护理对患者结局有何影响?文献回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2248-2259. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14058. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
7
Post-operative mortality, missed care and nurse staffing in nine countries: A cross-sectional study.术后死亡率、护理缺失与九个国家护士人力配置:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Feb;78:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
A cross-sectional study of 'care left undone' on nursing shifts in hospitals.一项关于医院护理班次中“未完成护理工作”的横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Sep;72(9):2086-97. doi: 10.1111/jan.12976. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
Organization of Hospital Nursing, Provision of Nursing Care, and Patient Experiences With Care in Europe.欧洲医院护理的组织、护理服务的提供以及患者的护理体验。
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Dec;72(6):643-64. doi: 10.1177/1077558715589188. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
"Data were saturated . . . ".数据已饱和……
Qual Health Res. 2015 May;25(5):587-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732315576699.