Suppr超能文献

基于学校的预防自杀思想和行为项目的有效性:荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of school-based preventive programs in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), P.O. Box 725, Utrecht 3500 AS, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam 3000 DR, the Netherlands; GGZ Oost Brabant, P.O. Box 3, Boekel 5427 ZG, the Netherlands.

GGZ Oost Brabant, P.O. Box 3, Boekel 5427 ZG, the Netherlands; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, Nijmegen 6500 HE, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 1;298(Pt A):408-420. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.062. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) among adolescents have hardly decreased despite preventative efforts. School-based prevention programs could have a great reach, yet suicide prevention is not an easy topic to address. To increase acceptability of school-based suicide prevention, it is important to evaluate whether programs that target known risk factors of STBs, such as depression, could be equally effective.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in major electronic databases. Outcomes were suicidal ideation and behaviors. Multivariate random effects meta-regression-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Eleven primary studies met the inclusion criteria, totalling 23,230 participants. The post-test effect size was small for both suicidal ideation (g = 0.15) and suicidal behaviors (g = 0.30). Meta-regression indicated that targeting known risk factors of STBs was not a significant modifier of effect size for ideation, indicating equal effectiveness. However, it was significant modifier of effect for behaviors, but only one intervention targeted know risk factors. Effects at follow-up (3-12 months) were also significant but small for both outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

Substantial heterogeneity between studies was noted. Only few and small sample size studies could be included that targeted known risk factors of STBs. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

School-based prevention of STBs shows some promise within three months post-test assessments, and potentially also have effects that are sustained over time. More studies are needed to make conclusions regarding school-based interventions that target risk factors of STBs.

摘要

背景

尽管采取了预防措施,青少年的自杀念头和行为(STB)几乎没有减少。基于学校的预防计划可以覆盖很大范围,但自杀预防并不是一个容易解决的话题。为了提高基于学校的自杀预防措施的可接受性,评估针对自杀念头和行为的已知风险因素(如抑郁)的预防计划是否同样有效非常重要。

方法

我们在主要电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。结局指标为自杀意念和行为。采用多变量随机效应荟萃回归分析。

结果

符合纳入标准的有 11 项主要研究,共计 23230 名参与者。自杀意念和行为的事后效应大小均较小,分别为 g=0.15 和 g=0.30。元回归分析表明,针对自杀念头和行为的已知风险因素并不是效应大小的显著调节因素,表明干预措施同样有效。但是,它是行为的显著调节因素,但只有一项干预措施针对已知风险因素。在随访(3-12 个月)时,两个结局的效果也显著,但仍较小。

局限性

研究之间存在很大的异质性。只能纳入少数针对自杀念头和行为的已知风险因素的小型样本量研究。因此,这些结果应谨慎解释。

结论

基于学校的自杀念头和行为预防措施在测试后三个月内显示出一定的效果,并且可能具有持续的效果。需要更多的研究来得出关于针对自杀念头和行为风险因素的基于学校的干预措施的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验