• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穿刺活检的前列腺炎症与多参数磁共振成像检测临床显著性前列腺癌的假阳性率相关。

Bioptic prostatic inflammation correlates with false positive rates of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.

作者信息

Falagario Ugo Giovanni, Recchia Marco, Silecchia Giovanni, Milillo Paola, Francavilla Alessia, Bruno Salvatore Mariano, Selvaggio Oscar, Busetto Gian Maria, Sanguedolce Francesca, Macarini Luca, Carrieri Giuseppe, Cormio Luigi

机构信息

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):308-314. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.3.074.R1. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

DOI:10.5173/ceju.2021.3.074.R1
PMID:34729218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8552932/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article was to determine the impact of bioptic prostatic inflammation (PI) on the false positive rate of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in detecting clinically significant prostate ancer (csPCa).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our prostate biopsy database was queried to identify patients who underwent mp-MRI before PB at our institution. A dedicated uropathologist prospectively assessed bioptic PI using the Irani scores. We evaluated the association between mp-MRI findings, bioptic Gleason grade (GG) and aggressiveness of PI, and PCa detection.

RESULTS

In total, 366 men were included. In patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 4-5 lesions, the csPCa (GG ≥2) rate was significantly higher in those with low-grade than in those with high-grade PI (36% vs 29.7%; p = 0.002), and in those with low-aggressive than in those with high-aggressive PI (37.7% vs 30.1%; p = 0.0003). The false positive rates of PIRADS 4-5 lesions for any PCa were 34.2% and 57.8% for low- and high-grade PI, respectively (p = 0.002); similarly, they were 29.5% and 59.4% for mildly and highly-aggressive PI (p = 0.0003). Potential study limitations include its retrospective analysis and single-center study and lack of assessment of the type of PI.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioptic PI directly correlates with false positive rates of mp-MRI in detecting csPCa. Clinicians should be aware that PI remains the most common pitfall of mp-MRI.

摘要

引言

本文旨在确定活检前列腺炎症(PI)对多参数磁共振成像(mp-MRI)检测临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)假阳性率的影响。

材料与方法

查询我们的前列腺活检数据库,以识别在我们机构接受前列腺穿刺活检(PB)前接受mp-MRI检查的患者。一名专业泌尿病理学家前瞻性地使用伊朗评分评估活检PI。我们评估了mp-MRI结果、活检Gleason分级(GG)与PI侵袭性以及PCa检测之间的关联。

结果

总共纳入了366名男性。在前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)4-5级病变的患者中,低级别PI患者的csPCa(GG≥2)率显著高于高级别PI患者(36%对29.7%;p=0.002),低侵袭性PI患者的csPCa率显著高于高侵袭性PI患者(37.7%对30.1%;p=0.0003)。低级别和高级别PI的PIRADS 4-5级病变对任何PCa的假阳性率分别为34.2%和57.8%(p=0.002);同样,轻度和高度侵袭性PI的假阳性率分别为29.5%和59.4%(p=0.0003)。潜在的研究局限性包括其回顾性分析、单中心研究以及缺乏对PI类型的评估。

结论

活检PI与mp-MRI检测csPCa的假阳性率直接相关。临床医生应意识到PI仍然是mp-MRI最常见的陷阱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/8552932/4eb28bbd65bb/CEJU-74-074.R1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/8552932/3785c65bf485/CEJU-74-074.R1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/8552932/4eb28bbd65bb/CEJU-74-074.R1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/8552932/3785c65bf485/CEJU-74-074.R1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/8552932/4eb28bbd65bb/CEJU-74-074.R1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bioptic prostatic inflammation correlates with false positive rates of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.穿刺活检的前列腺炎症与多参数磁共振成像检测临床显著性前列腺癌的假阳性率相关。
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):308-314. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.3.074.R1. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
2
Combination of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Elastic-fusion Biopsy Has a High Sensitivity in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Daily Practice.在日常实践中,多参数磁共振成像与弹性融合活检相结合具有很高的检测临床显著前列腺癌的敏感性。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Oct;18(5):e501-e509. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
3
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
4
The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层扫描对多参数磁共振成像分类在前列腺癌诊断中的附加诊断价值(原发性):一项前瞻性多中心研究
Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
5
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.评估多参数磁共振成像阳性在疑似前列腺癌年轻男性中的临床价值。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检阴性后,3-T 多参数 MRI 引导下腔内活检用于检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Sep;215(3):660-666. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22455. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版检测临床显著前列腺癌的阳性预测值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
9
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.FUTURE 试验:一项基于磁共振成像的靶向活检技术在既往阴性前列腺穿刺活检患者中诊断前列腺癌的多中心随机对照研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Chronic Prostatitis on the PI-RADS Score 3: Proposal for the Addition of a Novel Binary Suffix.慢性前列腺炎对前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3分的影响:关于添加一个新的二元后缀的提议
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 30;11(4):623. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040623.
2
Does Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance of Prostate Outperform Risk Calculators in Predicting Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Patients?在未经活检的患者中,前列腺多参数磁共振成像在预测前列腺癌方面是否优于风险计算器?
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 8;10:603384. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.603384. eCollection 2020.
3
Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
基于前列腺磁共振成像结局数据库(PROMOD)的多中心回顾性研究:应用前列腺特异性抗原密度和磁共振成像联合进行前列腺活检决策规划
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):971-979. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.经会阴电磁跟踪磁共振成像/超声融合引导活检队列:评估读者间变异性对癌症检出率的影响。
BJU Int. 2020 Apr;125(4):531-540. doi: 10.1111/bju.14957. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.避免不必要的磁共振成像(MRI)和活检:基于前列腺特异性抗原密度、4Kscore 和风险计算器的 MRI 的阴性和阳性预测值。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):700-704. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
Inflammation appears as high Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) leading to false positive MRI fusion biopsy.炎症在前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)上表现为高前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分,导致 MRI 融合活检出现假阳性。
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Sep;60(5):388-395. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.5.388. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.用于检测前列腺癌的前列腺磁共振成像(MRI),无论是否进行MRI靶向活检及系统活检。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
8
Development and Internal Validation of Novel Nomograms Based on Benign Prostatic Obstruction-Related Parameters to Predict the Risk of Prostate Cancer at First Prostate Biopsy.基于良性前列腺梗阻相关参数的新型列线图的开发与内部验证,以预测首次前列腺穿刺活检时前列腺癌的风险。
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 16;8:438. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00438. eCollection 2018.
9
Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.基于斯德哥尔摩 3 项血液检测和多参数磁共振成像的前列腺癌诊断。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
An update of pitfalls in prostate mpMRI: a practical approach through the lens of PI-RADS v. 2 guidelines.前列腺磁共振多参数成像(mpMRI)陷阱的更新:基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v.2版指南的实用方法
Insights Imaging. 2018 Feb;9(1):87-101. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0578-x. Epub 2017 Oct 23.