Chen Elaine, Longcoy Joshua, McGowan Samuel K, Lange-Maia Brittney S, Avery Elizabeth F, Lynch Elizabeth B, Ansell David A, Johnson Tricia J
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Section of Palliative Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University, Center for Community Health Equity, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Oct 18;3(10):e0559. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000559. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Studying interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in the spring 2020 surge may help inform future pandemic management.
To compare outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 transferred to a tertiary referral center with increased surge capacity with patients admitted from the emergency department.
Observational cohort study of single center urban academic medical center ICUs. All patients admitted and discharged with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia who received invasive ventilation between March 17, 2020, and October 14, 2020.
Demographic and clinical variables were obtained from the electronic medical record. Patients were classified as emergency department admits or interhospital transfers. Regression models tested the association between transfer status and survival, adjusting for demographics and presentation severity.
In total, 298 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia were admitted to the ICU and received mechanical ventilation. Of these, 117 were transferred from another facility and 181 were admitted through the emergency department. Patients were primarily male (64%) and Black (38%) or Hispanic (45%). Transfer patients differed from emergency department admits in having English as a preferred language (71% vs 56%; = 0.008) and younger age (median 57 vs 61 yr; < 0.001). There were no differences in race/ethnicity or primary payor. Transfers were more likely to receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (12% vs 3%; = 0.004). Overall, 50 (43%) transferred patients and 78 (43%) emergency department admits died prior to discharge. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality or days from intubation to discharge between the two groups.
In a single-center retrospective cohort, no significant differences in hospital mortality or length of stay between interhospital transfers and emergency department admits were found. While more study is needed, this suggests that interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 can be done safely and effectively.
研究2020年春季新冠病毒肺炎危重症患者的院间转运情况,可能有助于为未来的疫情管理提供参考。
比较机械通气的新冠病毒肺炎患者转至具备更高应急能力的三级转诊中心后的结局与急诊科收治患者的结局。
设计、地点、参与者:对单中心城市学术医疗中心重症监护病房进行观察性队列研究。纳入2020年3月17日至2020年10月14日期间因新冠病毒肺炎住院并接受有创通气且已出院的所有患者。
从电子病历中获取人口统计学和临床变量。患者分为急诊科收治患者或院间转运患者。回归模型检验转运状态与生存之间的关联,并对人口统计学和病情严重程度进行校正。
共有298例新冠病毒肺炎患者入住重症监护病房并接受机械通气。其中,117例从其他机构转入,181例通过急诊科收治。患者以男性为主(64%),黑人占38%或西班牙裔占45%。转运患者与急诊科收治患者的不同之处在于,转运患者更倾向以英语为首选语言(71%对56%;P = 0.008)且年龄更小(中位年龄57岁对61岁;P < 0.001)。种族/民族或主要支付方无差异。转运患者更有可能接受体外膜肺氧合治疗(12%对3%;P = 0.004)。总体而言,50例(43%)转运患者和78例(43%)急诊科收治患者在出院前死亡。两组患者的医院死亡率或从插管到出院的天数无显著差异。
在一项单中心回顾性队列研究中,未发现院间转运患者与急诊科收治患者在医院死亡率或住院时间方面存在显著差异。虽然需要更多研究,但这表明新冠病毒肺炎危重症患者的院间转运可以安全有效地进行。