Stark Adam J, Chohan Sanjiv
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Aug;24(3):277-282. doi: 10.1177/17511437221111638. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
During the second wave of COVID-19 cases within Scotland, local evidence suggested that a large number of interhospital transfers occurred due to both physical capacity and staff shortages. Although there are inherent risks with transferring critically ill patients between hospitals, there are signals in the literature that mortality is not affected in COVID-19 patients when transferred between intensive care units. With a lack of evidence in the Scottish population, and as the greatest source of capacity transfers in our critical care network at that time, we sought to determine whether these transfers impacted on survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to our unit between the 1st October 2020 and the 31st March 2021 with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were grouped according to whether they underwent an interhospital capacity transfer or not, either for unit shortage of beds or unit shortage of staff. The primary outcome measure was survival to ultimate hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes included total ventilator days and total intensive care unit length of stay. Baseline characteristic data were also collected for all patients. Survival data were entered into a backward stepwise logistic regression analysis that included transfer status, and coefficients transformed into odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 108 patients were included. Of these, 30 were transferred to another intensive care unit due to capacity issues at the base hospital. From the baseline characteristic data, age was significantly higher in those transferred out, while other characteristics were similar. Unadjusted mortality rates were 30.8% for those not transferred, and 40% for those transferred out. However, when entered into a logistic regression analysis to attempt to control for confounders in the baseline characteristics, being transferred had an odds ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.43-3.1) for survival to hospital discharge. Total ventilator days and total ICU length of stay were both higher in the transferred patients. This unique study of COVID-19 patients transferred from a Scottish district general hospital did not show an association between transfer status and survival to hospital discharge. However, the study was likely underpowered to detect small differences. As the situation continues to evolve, a prospective regional multi-centre study may help to provide more robust findings.
在苏格兰第二波新冠疫情期间,当地证据表明,由于物理空间和人员短缺,大量患者在医院间进行了转运。尽管在医院间转运重症患者存在固有风险,但文献中有迹象表明,新冠患者在重症监护病房之间转运时死亡率不受影响。由于苏格兰人群缺乏相关证据,且当时我们重症监护网络中最大的容量转移来源,我们试图确定这些转运是否会影响患者存活至出院。我们对2020年10月1日至2021年3月31日期间入住我们科室且初步诊断为新冠肺炎的所有患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者根据是否因床位短缺或人员短缺而在医院间进行容量转移进行分组。主要结局指标是存活至最终出院,次要结局包括总机械通气天数和总重症监护病房住院时长。我们还收集了所有患者的基线特征数据。将存活数据纳入包含转移状态的向后逐步逻辑回归分析,并将系数转换为比值比和95%置信区间。总共纳入了108名患者。其中,30名患者因基层医院容量问题被转至另一家重症监护病房。从基线特征数据来看,转出患者的年龄显著更高,而其他特征相似。未转出患者的未调整死亡率为30.8%,转出患者为40%。然而,在进行逻辑回归分析以试图控制基线特征中的混杂因素时,转出对于存活至出院的比值比为1.14(95%置信区间0.43 - 3.1)。转出患者的总机械通气天数和总重症监护病房住院时长均更高。这项针对从苏格兰地区综合医院转出的新冠患者的独特研究并未显示转移状态与存活至出院之间存在关联。然而,该研究可能因检验效能不足而无法检测到微小差异。随着情况不断演变,一项前瞻性区域多中心研究可能有助于提供更有力的研究结果。