• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与开放性单纯前列腺切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析比较研究的结果。

Robotic-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

机构信息

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, NUHS, Jurong East, Singapore.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Nov;62(6):631-640. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210297.

DOI:10.4111/icu.20210297
PMID:34729963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8566792/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To review safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) compared to open simple prostatectomy (OP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed to assess the differences in perioperative course and functional outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and surgical indication. The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method and expressed as odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-values. Perioperative course and functional outcomes were pooled using the inverse variance of the mean difference (MD), 95% CI, and p-values. Analyses were two-tailed and the significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Eight studies were accepted. Meta-analysis showed significantly longer surgical time (MD, 43.72; 95% CI, 30.57-56.88; p<0.00001) with a significantly lower estimated blood loss (MD, -563.20; 95% CI, -739.95 to -386.46; p<0.00001) and shorter postoperative stay (MD, -2.85; 95% CI, -3.72 to -1.99; p<0.00001) in RASP. Catheterization time did not differ (MD, 0.65; 95% CI, -2.17 to 3.48; p=0.65). The risk of blood transfusion was significantly higher in OP (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17-0.33; p<0.00001). The risk of recatheterization (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.32-11.93; p=0.47), postoperative urinary infections (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.23-3.51; p=0.87) and 30-day readmission rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.61-1.51; p=0.86) did not differ. At 3-month follow-up, functional outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

RASP demonstrated a better perioperative outcome and equal early functional outcomes as compared to OP. These findings should be balanced against the longer operative time and higher cost of robotic surgery.

摘要

目的

回顾机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术(RASP)与开放性单纯前列腺切除术(OP)相比的安全性和疗效。

材料和方法

进行了全面的文献检索,以评估患有良性前列腺增生且具有手术指征的患者在围手术期过程和功能结果方面的差异。使用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 方法汇总并发症发生率,并表示为比值比(OR)、95%置信区间(CI)和 p 值。使用均值差(MD)的逆方差、95%CI 和 p 值汇总围手术期过程和功能结果。分析为双侧,显著性水平设定为 p<0.05。

结果

接受了八项研究。荟萃分析显示,RASP 的手术时间明显更长(MD,43.72;95%CI,30.57-56.88;p<0.00001),估计失血量明显减少(MD,-563.20;95%CI,-739.95 至-386.46;p<0.00001),术后住院时间明显缩短(MD,-2.85;95%CI,-3.72 至-1.99;p<0.00001)。导尿管留置时间无差异(MD,0.65;95%CI,-2.17 至 3.48;p=0.65)。OP 中输血的风险明显更高(OR,0.23;95%CI,0.17-0.33;p<0.00001)。再导尿的风险(OR,1.96;95%CI,0.32-11.93;p=0.47)、术后尿路感染的风险(OR,0.89;95%CI,0.23-3.51;p=0.87)和 30 天再入院率(OR,0.96;95%CI,0.61-1.51;p=0.86)无差异。在 3 个月随访时,功能结果相似。

结论

与 OP 相比,RASP 显示出更好的围手术期结果和同等的早期功能结果。这些发现应该与机器人手术更高的手术时间和成本相平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/dcc069b5a304/icu-62-631-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/0d5747f19de8/icu-62-631-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/e93f994b0aef/icu-62-631-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/d18d3ff32d13/icu-62-631-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/a8612704969e/icu-62-631-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/dcc069b5a304/icu-62-631-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/0d5747f19de8/icu-62-631-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/e93f994b0aef/icu-62-631-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/d18d3ff32d13/icu-62-631-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/a8612704969e/icu-62-631-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/8566792/dcc069b5a304/icu-62-631-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.机器人辅助与开放性单纯前列腺切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析比较研究的结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Nov;62(6):631-640. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210297.
2
Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy versus other treatment modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6500 cases.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术与其他治疗方法治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的比较:超过 6500 例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Sep;26(3):495-510. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00616-4. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
3
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状:大容量机器人中心的手术技术和结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
4
Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy versus robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.腹腔镜单纯前列腺切除术与机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):351-364. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01460-3. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy and laser enucleation of prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术与激光前列腺剜除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的疗效与安全性比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2687-2695. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01734-4. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
A prospective comparative analysis of robot-assisted vs open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.机器人辅助与开放性单纯前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的前瞻性对比分析。
BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):313-317. doi: 10.1111/bju.14531. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
7
Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术的改良技术:膀胱-尿道吻合术的优势。
BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):426-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.010401.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
8
Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Large Glands: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative and Short-Term Outcomes.机器人辅助与开放单纯前列腺切除术治疗大腺体良性前列腺增生:围手术期和短期结局的倾向评分匹配比较
J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1164-1169. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0489. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
9
Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic vs open simple prostatectomy in the modern robotic era: results from the National Inpatient Sample.在现代机器人时代,机器人辅助与开放简单前列腺切除术的围手术期结果和成本:来自国家住院患者样本的结果。
BJU Int. 2021 Aug;128(2):168-177. doi: 10.1111/bju.15258. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic surgery in healthcare: current challenges, technological advances, and global implementation prospects.医疗保健中的机器人手术:当前挑战、技术进展及全球实施前景。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 8;19(1):577. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02702-w.
2
Application of robotics in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a narrative review.机器人技术在良性前列腺增生治疗中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Prostate Int. 2025 Jun;13(2):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
Comment on "Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study".

本文引用的文献

1
Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy.开放性单纯前列腺切除术与机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术治疗巨大良性前列腺增生:安全性与疗效比较
Prostate Int. 2021 Jun;9(2):101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.004. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Diffusion and adoption of the surgical robot in urology.手术机器人在泌尿外科的推广与应用
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2151-2157. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.33.
3
Single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is associated with decreased post-operative narcotic use in a propensity score matched analysis.
关于“机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生合并困扰性下尿路症状——一项回顾性队列研究”的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 1;19(1):256. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02431-0.
4
The Implementation of Trifecta Score to Assess the Quality of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes and the Impact of Age.采用三联评分法评估老年患者前列腺钬激光剜除术质量:围手术期及功能结局分析以及年龄的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 May 13;14(10):3410. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103410.
5
Endoscopic enucleation vs. robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for large prostates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients' perspectives.内镜剜除术与机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术治疗大前列腺:基于患者视角的系统评价与荟萃分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00973-w.
6
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生伴恼人下尿路症状男性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 23;19(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02168-2.
7
Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy mitigates perioperative morbidity compared to open simple prostatectomy - a single institution report.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术与开放单纯前列腺切除术相比可减轻围手术期发病率-单机构报告。
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01615-4.
8
A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.机器人辅助手术在胸腹部手术中的全经济评估的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2671-2685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
9
Comparative analysis of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the HUGO™ RAS system versus the DaVinci® Xi system.机器人辅助简单前列腺切除术的比较分析:HUGO™ RAS 系统与达芬奇® Xi 系统。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):122-128. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00726-7. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
10
Proctored adoption of robotic hiatus hernia surgery: outcomes and learning curves in a high-volume UK centre.机器人食管裂孔疝修补术的有监督采用:在英国高容量中心的结果和学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7608-7615. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10210-x. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
单孔机器人辅助简单前列腺切除术与术后阿片类药物使用减少相关:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01236-1. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a New York statewide analysis of early adoption and outcomes between 2009 and 2017.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术与开放性单纯前列腺切除术:纽约州2009年至2017年早期采用情况及手术结果的全州分析
J Robot Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):627-633. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01152-w. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic vs open simple prostatectomy in the modern robotic era: results from the National Inpatient Sample.在现代机器人时代,机器人辅助与开放简单前列腺切除术的围手术期结果和成本:来自国家住院患者样本的结果。
BJU Int. 2021 Aug;128(2):168-177. doi: 10.1111/bju.15258. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 9;9(6):1798. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061798.
8
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a single-center comparison.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术与开放性单纯前列腺切除术的单中心比较。
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03168-1. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
9
Single-Port Percutaneous Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy Using the SP Robotic System: Initial Clinical Experience.单孔经皮经膀胱前列腺切除术联合 SP 机器人系统:初步临床经验。
Urology. 2020 Jul;141:173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.024. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
State of the Art of Thulium Laser Enucleation and Vapoenucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review.钬激光前列腺剜除术和前列腺汽化切除术的现状:系统评价。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.022. Epub 2019 Nov 11.