Suppr超能文献

智能手机单导联心电图与 12 导联心电图手动 QT 间期测量的比较:初级保健中患者内诊断验证研究。

Manual QT interval measurement with a smartphone-operated single-lead ECG versus 12-lead ECG: a within-patient diagnostic validation study in primary care.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG), Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 3;11(11):e055072. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055072.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of QT measurement in a smartphone-operated, single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) device (AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, within-patient diagnostic validation study.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Patients underwent a 12-lead ECG (12L-ECG) for any non-acute indication in primary care, April 2017-July 2018.

INTERVENTION

Simultaneous recording of 1L-ECGs and 12L-ECGs with blinded manual QT assessment. OUTCOMES OF INTEREST: (1) Difference in QT interval in milliseconds (ms) between the devices; (2) measurement agreement between the devices (excellent agreement <20 ms and clinically acceptable agreement <40 ms absolute difference); (3) sensitivity and specificity for detection of extreme QTc (short (≤340 ms) or long (≥480 ms)), on 1L-ECGs versus 12L-ECGs as reference standard. In case of significant discrepancy between lead I/II of 12L-ECGs and 1L-ECGs, we developed a correction tool by adding the difference between QT measurements of 12L-ECG and 1L-ECGs.

RESULTS

250 ECGs of 125 patients were included. The mean QTc interval, using Bazett's formula (QTcB), was 393±25 ms (mean±SD) in 1L-ECGs and 392±27 ms in lead I of 12L-ECGs, a mean difference of 1±21 ms, which was not statistically different (paired t-test (p=0.51) and Bland Altman method (p=0.23)). In terms of agreement between 1L-ECGs and lead I, QTcB had excellent agreement in 66.9% and clinically acceptable agreement in 93.4% of observations. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting extreme QTc were 0% and 99.2%, respectively. The comparison of 1L-ECG QTcB with lead II of 12L-ECGs showed a significant difference (p=<0.01), but when using a correction factor (+9 ms) this difference was cancelled (paired t-test (p=0.43) or Bland Altman test (p=0.57)). Moreover, it led to improved rates of excellent (71.3%) and clinically acceptable (94.3%) agreement.

CONCLUSION

Smartphone-operated 1L-ECGs can be used to accurately measure the QTc interval compared with simultaneously obtained 12L-ECGs in a primary care population. This may provide an opportunity for monitoring the effects of potential QTc-prolonging medications.

摘要

目的

确定智能手机操作的单导联心电图(1L-ECG)设备(AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L)中 QT 测量的准确性。

设计

患者于 2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 7 月在初级保健机构因任何非急性原因进行 12 导联心电图(12L-ECG)检查。

干预措施

同时记录 1L-ECG 和 12L-ECG,并进行盲法手动 QT 评估。

研究结果

共纳入 125 例患者的 250 份心电图。使用 Bazett 公式(QTcB)计算的平均 QTc 间期在 1L-ECG 中为 393±25ms(平均值±标准差),在 12L-ECG 的 I 导联中为 392±27ms,平均差异为 1±21ms,无统计学差异(配对 t 检验(p=0.51)和 Bland-Altman 方法(p=0.23))。在 1L-ECG 和 I 导联之间的一致性方面,QTcB 在 66.9%的情况下具有极好的一致性,在 93.4%的情况下具有可接受的一致性。检测极端 QTc 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0%和 99.2%。与 12L-ECG 的 II 导联相比,1L-ECG 的 QTcB 具有显著差异(p<0.01),但使用校正因子(+9ms)后,这种差异被消除(配对 t 检验(p=0.43)或 Bland-Altman 检验(p=0.57))。此外,这导致极好(71.3%)和可接受(94.3%)一致性的比率提高。

结论

智能手机操作的 1L-ECG 可用于准确测量与初级保健人群中同时获得的 12L-ECG 相比的 QTc 间期。这可能为监测潜在的 QT 延长药物的效果提供机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a944/8572408/b1b13a38ece0/bmjopen-2021-055072f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验