Suppr超能文献

一款基于患者监护仪上显示的心电图波形快照进行半自动QT间期分析的智能手机应用程序。

A smartphone application for semi-automated QT interval analysis based on a snapshot of an electrocardiogram trace displayed on a patient monitor.

作者信息

Beckmann David, Flick Moritz, Kouz Karim, Saugel Bernd

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01277-z.

Abstract

We developed a smartphone application (SMART-QT application) that can semi-automatically measure QT and QTc intervals based on a snapshot of the electrocardiogram (ECG) trace and the heart rate displayed on a patient monitor. In this study, we aimed to validate the SMART-QT application. In this prospective single-center method comparison study, we measured QT and QTc intervals with the SMART-QT application (QT and QTc; test method) and simultaneously manually measured QT and QTc intervals from a 12-lead ECG (QT and QTc; reference method) in 57 adult volunteers and patients who had sinus rhythm and no acute or chronic cardiac comorbidities. To investigate the agreement between QT and QT and between QTc and QTc, we performed Bland-Altman analyses and calculated the mean of the differences, the standard deviation, and the 95%-limits of agreement (95%-LOA). We defined clinically acceptable agreement as maximum mean of the differences ± standard deviation of 20 ± 20 ms. The mean of the differences between QT and QT was 14 ± 20 ms (95%-LOA -26 to 54 ms). The mean of the differences between QTc and QTc was 13 ± 15 ms (95%-LOA -16 to 42 ms). The agreement between QT and QT and between QTc and QTc was clinically acceptable in adult volunteers and patients without cardiac comorbidities.

摘要

我们开发了一款智能手机应用程序(SMART-QT应用程序),它能够基于心电图(ECG)波形快照以及患者监护仪上显示的心率半自动测量QT和QTc间期。在本研究中,我们旨在验证SMART-QT应用程序。在这项前瞻性单中心方法比较研究中,我们对57名窦性心律且无急慢性心脏合并症的成年志愿者和患者,使用SMART-QT应用程序测量QT和QTc间期(QT和QTc;测试方法),同时从12导联心电图手动测量QT和QTc间期(QT和QTc;参考方法)。为研究QT与QT之间以及QTc与QTc之间的一致性,我们进行了布兰德-奥特曼分析,并计算了差异均值、标准差以及95%一致性界限(95%-LOA)。我们将临床上可接受的一致性定义为差异均值的最大值±标准差为20±20毫秒。QT与QT之间的差异均值为14±20毫秒(95%-LOA为-26至54毫秒)。QTc与QTc之间的差异均值为13±15毫秒(95%-LOA为-16至4天毫秒)。在无心脏合并症的成年志愿者和患者中,QT与QT之间以及QTc与QTc之间的一致性在临床上是可接受的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验