Gold L S, Wright C, Bernstein L, deVeciana M
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Jun;78(6):1149-58.
Reproducibility of results was examined in 70 "near-replicate" comparisons consisting of 2 or more long-term carcinogenesis bioassays of the same chemical administered by the same route and using the same sex and strain of rodent. Overall, there was good reproducibility of positivity, target site, and carcinogenic potency in hamsters, mice, and rats. The published authors' opinions about whether the test was positive disagreed in only 9 of the 70 comparisons. Among the 35 comparisons in which all tests of the chemical were positive, 33 of the near-replicates had at least 1 identical target site. The carcinogenic potency values estimated from near-replicate tests in these 35 comparisons were within a factor of 2 of each other in 40% of the comparisons, within a factor of 5 in 80%, and within a factor of 10 in 90%. For the few cases in which the carcinogenic response was not reproduced, analyses suggest two explanations: In mice the discrepant cases tended to have shorter experiment times than average; in both rats and mice the discrepant results tended to be tests of weakly active compounds.
在由2次或更多次对同一化学物质进行的长期致癌生物测定组成的70次“近似重复”比较中,对结果的可重复性进行了检验。这些生物测定采用相同的给药途径,使用相同性别的相同品系啮齿动物。总体而言,仓鼠、小鼠和大鼠在阳性结果、靶器官部位及致癌效力方面具有良好的可重复性。在这70次比较中,发表的作者关于该试验是否呈阳性的观点仅有9次不一致。在该化学物质的所有试验均为阳性的35次比较中,33次近似重复试验至少有1个相同的靶器官部位。在这35次比较中,由近似重复试验估算出的致癌效力值,40%的比较中彼此相差不超过2倍,80%的比较中相差不超过5倍,90%的比较中相差不超过10倍。对于少数致癌反应未重现的情况,分析提出了两种解释:在小鼠中,出现差异的试验其试验时间往往短于平均时间;在大鼠和小鼠中,出现差异的结果往往是对活性较弱的化合物进行的试验。