Kenareh Rahele, Mirmohammadi Seyyed Jalil, Khatibi Amidoddine, Shamsi Farimah, Mehrparvar Amir Houshang
Occupational Health Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Industrial diseases Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 May 17;12:e20. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.20. eCollection 2021.
Chronic neck pain is a common complaint among office workers. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a high-intensity laser and physiotherapy in office workers who were diagnosed with chronic non-specific neck pain. This study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial, with parallel allocation. Sixty office workers with chronic neck pain, aged between 25 and 55 years, participated in the study. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: photobiomodulation (by a high-level laser) and physiotherapy. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) and Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQN) were completed on three occasions (before, immediately and 2 weeks after the intervention) to assess and compare the efficacy of the high-intensity laser and physiotherapy in neck pain. Data were analyzed by SPSS 23 software using the chi-square test, Student's test, multivariate tests, and Fisher's exact test. The mean age of the participants was 37.53±9.52 and 41.16±7.85 years in physiotherapy and laser therapy respectively. The VAS score and NDI scores decreased after both kinds of interventions, and the effect of photobiomodulation was significantly higher than physiotherapy ( < 0.001). Both treatment modalities significantly affect different aspects of chronic neck pain assessed by NDPS and BQN questionnaires and the effect of photobiomodulation was more prominent than physiotherapy. The findings of this study showed that photobiomodulation and physiotherapy can reduce chronic neck pain and its different aspects and the effect of laser therapy was significantly higher than physiotherapy.
慢性颈部疼痛是上班族的常见问题。本研究的目的是比较高强度激光和物理治疗对被诊断为慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的上班族的疗效。本研究为单盲随机对照试验,采用平行分组。60名年龄在25至55岁之间的慢性颈部疼痛上班族参与了该研究。参与者被随机分为两组:光生物调节(通过高强度激光)组和物理治疗组。在三个时间点(干预前、干预后即刻和干预后2周)完成视觉模拟量表(VAS)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表(NPDS)以及伯恩茅斯问卷(BQN),以评估和比较高强度激光和物理治疗对颈部疼痛的疗效。使用SPSS 23软件,通过卡方检验、学生t检验、多变量检验和Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析。物理治疗组和激光治疗组参与者的平均年龄分别为37.53±9.52岁和41.16±7.85岁。两种干预后VAS评分和NDI评分均下降,且光生物调节的效果显著高于物理治疗(P<0.001)。两种治疗方式均对通过NDPS和BQN问卷评估的慢性颈部疼痛的不同方面有显著影响,且光生物调节的效果比物理治疗更突出。本研究结果表明,光生物调节和物理治疗均可减轻慢性颈部疼痛及其不同方面,且激光治疗的效果显著高于物理治疗。