Faculty of Economic Sciences, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Economics, University Jaume I., Castello de la Plana, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259187. eCollection 2021.
According to 2016 official estimates, almost 60% of the rural population in Mexico (16.9 million people) had income levels below the poverty line, and approximately 29.2% (8.3 million) could not even afford the basic food basket. Whereas most poverty research disregards gender and exclusively analyzes average income or the expected probability of being poor, we depart from these approaches by examining the effect of potential risk factors on two of the lowest quantiles of income-to-poverty ratio distribution, namely the corresponding to poor and extremely poor families. Focusing on identifying heterogeneous effects according to the sex of the household head, we apply additive quantile models to a cross-sectional dataset containing information on 4,434 women-headed and 14,877 men-headed households. For each model, we introduce 45 variables at the individual/household, community, and regional levels. Two major contributions emerge from this paper. First, the identification of a subset of significant factors whose effect is independent of the head's sex and is relevant for poor and extremely poor families. This is found for the variables credit card ownership, access to basic housing services, education level, and satisfaction with public services. Second, results also identify a subset of significant factors with an uneven effect on income according to the sex of the head that is observed both in the poor and extremely poor households. Variables having this gendered effect are the community's income inequality, municipal human development, social networks, access to social security, and gender-based violence against women in the public sphere. Out of these, particularly relevant is the effect of the last three factors, whose association with income has not been explored before for rural Mexico and for which the bias among sexes increases as family income grows from extreme poverty to poverty level.
根据 2016 年的官方估计,墨西哥近 60%的农村人口(1690 万人)收入水平低于贫困线,约 29.2%(830 万人)甚至负担不起基本的食物篮。大多数贫困研究忽略了性别,仅分析平均收入或陷入贫困的预期概率,而我们通过考察潜在风险因素对收入-贫困比分布的两个最低分位数的影响,即贫困和极度贫困家庭的相应影响,偏离了这些方法。我们专注于根据家庭户主的性别识别异质效应,将加性分位数模型应用于包含 4434 个女性户主和 14877 个男性户主家庭信息的横截面数据集。对于每个模型,我们在个人/家庭、社区和地区层面引入 45 个变量。本文有两个主要贡献。首先,确定了一组重要因素,这些因素的影响独立于户主的性别,对贫困和极度贫困家庭具有重要意义。这在信用卡拥有、获得基本住房服务、教育水平和对公共服务的满意度等变量中得到了体现。其次,结果还确定了一组重要因素,这些因素对收入的影响根据户主的性别而不均匀,在贫困和极度贫困家庭中都可以观察到。具有这种性别效应的变量是社区的收入不平等、市人类发展、社会网络、获得社会保障以及公共领域对妇女的性别暴力。其中,最后三个因素的影响尤为重要,这些因素以前在墨西哥农村地区没有被探索过,而且随着家庭收入从极度贫困到贫困水平的增长,性别之间的偏见也在增加。