University of Tampa, 401 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Nov 4;6(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00340-y.
Two experiments assessed how racial ambiguity and racial salience moderates the cross-race effect (CRE). In experiment 1, White and Black participants studied and identified the race of Asian, Black, Latino, and White faces that varied in ethnic typicality (high or low ET). For White participants, the CRE was larger when comparing high-ET White faces to high-ET other-race faces than low-ET other-race faces. Black participants showed a similar CRE reduction by ethnic typicality, but also showed a less prevalent CRE than White participants. Experiment 2 replicated experiment 1 procedures, but without the race identification task and only with White participants. Experiment 2 findings were comparable to experiment 1. Furthermore, experiment 2 showed a noticeably smaller CRE on Black faces than experiment 1, eliciting questions about increased racial salience amplifying the CRE. Results' general implications and the conceptual roots that indirectly link the CRE and racism will be discussed.
两个实验评估了种族模糊性和种族凸显如何调节跨种族效应 (CRE)。在实验 1 中,白人和黑人参与者研究并识别了在族裔典型性(高或低 ET)上有所不同的亚洲、黑种人、拉丁裔和白种人脸的种族。对于白人参与者来说,将高 ET 白人面孔与高 ET 其他种族面孔进行比较比与低 ET 其他种族面孔进行比较时,CRE 更大。黑人参与者在族裔典型性上表现出类似的 CRE 减少,但与白人参与者相比,CRE 出现的频率也较低。实验 2 复制了实验 1 的程序,但没有种族识别任务,只有白人参与者。实验 2 的发现与实验 1 相似。此外,实验 2 显示黑人面孔的 CRE 明显小于实验 1,引发了关于种族凸显度增加放大 CRE 的问题。将讨论结果的一般意义和间接联系 CRE 和种族主义的概念根源。