Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 4;21(1):1196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07115-7.
There is increasing awareness of the importance of patient activation (knowledge, skills, and confidence for managing one's health and health care) among clinicians and policy makers, with emerging evidence showing higher levels of patient activation are associated with better health outcomes and experiences of health care. This study aimed to examine the association between patient activation and a wide range of specific types of healthcare service utilisation in England, including GP and non-GP primary care, elective and emergency hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and attendances at the Accident and Emergency department.
Data were derived from linked electronic patient records collected by primary and secondary healthcare providers in North West London between January 2016 and November 2019. Our analyses focused on adults (18+) with a valid Patient Activation Measure (PAM). After excluding patients with missing data, we had an analytical sample of 15,877 patients. Data were analysed using negative binomial regression and logistic regression models depending on the outcome variable.
Patients had a mean activation score of 55.1 and a standard deviation (SD) of 17.7 (range: 0-100). They had an average of 5.4 GP visits (SD = 8.0), 26.8 non-GP visits (SD = 23.4) and 6.0 outpatient attendances (SD = 7.9) within a one-year follow-up. About 24.7% patients had at least one elective admission, 24.2% had one or more emergency admissions, and 42.3% had one or more A&E attendance within the follow-up. After accounting for a number of demographic and health factors, we found a linear (or proximately linear) association between patient activation and the number of GP visits, emergency admissions and A&E attendance, but a non-linear relationship between patient activation and the number of non-GP visits, the number of outpatient attendance and elective inpatient admission.
This study has provided strong empirical evidence from England linking patient activation with healthcare service utilisation. It suggests the value of supporting patient activation as a potential pathway to ease the burden of healthcare system.
临床医生和政策制定者越来越意识到患者激活(管理自身健康和医疗保健的知识、技能和信心)的重要性,新出现的证据表明,更高水平的患者激活与更好的健康结果和医疗体验相关。本研究旨在调查患者激活与英格兰广泛的特定类型医疗服务利用之间的关联,包括全科医生和非全科医生初级保健、选择性和紧急住院、门诊就诊和急诊就诊。
数据来自 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 11 月期间伦敦西北部的初级和二级医疗保健提供者收集的链接电子患者记录。我们的分析集中在有有效患者激活量表(PAM)的成年人(18 岁及以上)上。在排除缺失数据的患者后,我们有一个 15877 名患者的分析样本。根据结果变量,使用负二项式回归和逻辑回归模型进行数据分析。
患者的平均激活评分为 55.1,标准差(SD)为 17.7(范围:0-100)。在一年的随访中,他们平均有 5.4 次全科医生就诊(SD=8.0)、26.8 次非全科医生就诊(SD=23.4)和 6.0 次门诊就诊(SD=7.9)。大约 24.7%的患者至少有一次选择性入院,24.2%有一次或多次急诊入院,42.3%在随访中有一次或多次急诊就诊。在考虑了一些人口统计学和健康因素后,我们发现患者激活与全科医生就诊次数、急诊入院和急诊就诊之间存在线性(或近似线性)关系,但与非全科医生就诊次数、门诊就诊次数和选择性住院入院之间存在非线性关系。
本研究从英格兰提供了强有力的实证证据,将患者激活与医疗服务利用联系起来。它表明支持患者激活作为缓解医疗系统负担的潜在途径的价值。