School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07231-4.
There is inconsistent evidence that long working hours and night work are risk factors for sickness absence, but few studies have considered variation in the length of exposure time window as a potential source of mixed findings. We examined whether the association of long working hours and night work with sickness absence is dependent on the length of exposure to the working hour characteristics.
We analysed records of working hours, night work and sickness absence for a cohort of 9226 employees in one hospital district in Finland between 2008 and 2019. The exposure time windows ranged from 10 to 180 days, and we used Cox's proportional hazards models with time-dependent exposures to analyse the associations between working-hour characteristics and subsequent sickness absence.
Longer working hours for a period of 10 to 30 days was not associated with the risk of sickness absence whereas longer working hours for a period of 40 to 180 days was associated with a lower risk of sickness absence. Irrespective of exposure time window, night work was not associated with sickness absence.
It is important to consider the length of exposure time window when examining associations between long working hours and sickness absence, whereas the association between night work and sickness absence is not similarly sensitive to exposure times.
有证据表明,工作时间长和上夜班是请病假的风险因素,但很少有研究考虑暴露时间窗口的长度变化是否是导致结果不一致的潜在原因。我们研究了长时间工作和上夜班与病假之间的关联是否取决于对工作时间特征的暴露时间长度。
我们分析了芬兰一个医院区 2008 年至 2019 年间 9226 名员工的工作时间、上夜班和病假记录。暴露时间窗口从 10 天到 180 天不等,我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型和时间依赖性暴露来分析工作时间特征与随后病假之间的关联。
10 至 30 天的长时间工作与病假风险无关,而 40 至 180 天的长时间工作与病假风险降低有关。无论暴露时间窗口如何,上夜班与病假无关。
在研究长时间工作与病假之间的关联时,考虑暴露时间窗口的长度很重要,而夜班与病假之间的关联对暴露时间并不敏感。