Suppr超能文献

用于报告电磁波强度的物理单位。

Physical units to report intensity of electromagnetic wave.

作者信息

Ramirez-Vazquez R, Escobar I, Franco T, Arribas E

机构信息

University of Castilla-La Mancha, Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Computer Science Engineering, Albacete, Spain.

University of Castilla-La Mancha, Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Computer Science Engineering, Albacete, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt C):112341. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112341. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to propose a consensus to scientific community that handles personal exposimeters, which measure intensity of an electromagnetic wave (W/m). To express the intensity of an electromagnetic wave there is a duality in the way of expressing it. Some scientists prefer to use W/m while others use V/m, which is a unit of the electric field. There is also a duality in the name, sometimes it is called it power flux density and some other times, wave intensity. We believe that this second name is more appropriate from the point of view of physics. We suggest expressing intensity of an electromagnetic wave in W/m instead of giving the value of their electric field which is measured in V/m. There is a quadratic relation between electric field and intensity of the wave, and it is necessary to do a mathematical operation, so in our opinion, it is preferable to use W/m which directly gives us the value of the measured intensity. Furthermore, if the intensity is very low, it may be expressed in μW/m and with only three significant figures, due to sensitivity of the current exposimeters used.

摘要

这项工作的目的是向科学界提出一项关于处理个人暴露计的共识,这种暴露计用于测量电磁波的强度(W/m)。在表达电磁波强度方面存在双重性。一些科学家更喜欢使用W/m,而另一些科学家则使用V/m,V/m是电场的单位。在名称上也存在双重性,有时它被称为功率通量密度,有时又被称为波强度。我们认为,从物理学角度来看,第二个名称更合适。我们建议用W/m来表示电磁波的强度,而不是给出以V/m为单位测量的电场值。电场和波的强度之间存在二次关系,并且有必要进行数学运算,所以在我们看来,最好使用W/m,它能直接给出测量强度的值。此外,如果强度非常低,由于目前使用的暴露计的灵敏度,它可以用μW/m表示,且只保留三位有效数字。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验