Department of Internal Medicine Päijät-Häme Joint Authority for Health and Wellbeing Lahti Finland.
Preventive Cardio-Rheuma Clinic Division of Rheumatology and Research Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022883. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022883. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
Background Evidence on the impact of sex on prognoses after myocardial infarction (MI) among older adults is limited. We evaluated sex differences in long-term cardiovascular outcomes after MI in older adults. Methods and Results All patients with MI ≥70 years admitted to 20 Finnish hospitals during a 10-year period and discharged alive were studied retrospectively using a combination of national registries (n=31 578, 51% men, mean age 79). The primary outcome was combined major adverse cardiovascular event within 10-year follow-up. Sex differences in baseline features were equalized using inverse probability weighting adjustment. Women were older, with different comorbidity profiles and rarer ST-segment-elevation MI and revascularization, compared with men. Adenosine diphosphate inhibitors, anticoagulation, statins, and high-dose statins were more frequently used by men, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors and beta blockers by women. After balancing these differences by inverse probability weighting, the cumulative 10-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was 67.7% in men, 62.0% in women (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; CI, 1.13-1.21; <0.0001). New MI (37.0% in men, 33.1% in women; HR, 1.16; <0.0001), ischemic stroke (21.1% versus 19.5%; HR, 1.10; =0.004), and cardiovascular death (56.0% versus 51.1%; HR, 1.18; <0.0001) were more frequent in men during long-term follow-up after MI. Sex differences in major adverse cardiovascular events were similar in subgroups of revascularized and non-revascularized patients, and in patients 70 to 79 and ≥80 years. Conclusions Older men had higher long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after MI, compared with older women with similar baseline features and evidence-based medications. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for confounding factors when studying sex differences in cardiovascular outcomes.
关于性别对老年心肌梗死(MI)后预后影响的证据有限。我们评估了老年 MI 患者长期心血管结局的性别差异。
在 10 年期间,回顾性分析了 20 家芬兰医院收治的所有年龄≥70 岁的 MI 患者(n=31578 例,51%为男性,平均年龄 79 岁),并使用国家登记处进行了组合研究。主要终点是 10 年随访期间的复合主要不良心血管事件。使用逆概率加权调整均衡基线特征的性别差异。与男性相比,女性年龄更大,合并症谱不同,ST 段抬高型 MI 和血运重建较少。男性更常使用二磷酸腺苷抑制剂、抗凝剂、他汀类药物和高剂量他汀类药物,而女性更常使用肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂。通过逆概率加权平衡这些差异后,男性的 10 年累积主要不良心血管事件发生率为 67.7%,女性为 62.0%(危险比[HR],1.17;95%CI,1.13-1.21;<0.0001)。新发 MI(男性 37.0%,女性 33.1%;HR,1.16;<0.0001)、缺血性卒中(21.1%对 19.5%;HR,1.10;=0.004)和心血管死亡(56.0%对 51.1%;HR,1.18;<0.0001)在 MI 后长期随访期间更常见于男性。在接受血运重建和未接受血运重建的患者、70 至 79 岁和≥80 岁的患者亚组中,主要不良心血管事件的性别差异相似。
与具有相似基线特征和循证药物的老年女性相比,老年男性 MI 后长期发生主要不良心血管事件的风险更高。我们的结果强调了在研究心血管结局的性别差异时,考虑混杂因素的重要性。