• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物医学科学领域负责任研究实践的教育:迈向学习目标

Educating for Responsible Research Practice in Biomedical Sciences: Towards Learning Goals.

作者信息

Gerrits Elianne M, Bredenoord Annelien L, van Mil Marc H W

机构信息

Center of Education and Training, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(4):977-996. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00295-y. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11191-021-00295-y
PMID:34744313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8557998/
Abstract

New developments in the field of biomedicine can have extensive implications for society. To steer research efforts in a responsible direction, biomedical scientists should contribute to a forward-looking ethical, and societal evaluation of new developments. However, the question remains how to equip students sufficiently with the skills they need to contribute to this evaluation. In this paper, we examine how the four dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation (anticipation, reflexivity, inclusivity, and responsiveness) inform the identification of learning goals and teaching approaches that contribute to developing these skills in biomedical scientists. We suggest that these educational approaches focus on the skills to anticipate intended and unintended outcomes, reflect on the epistemological and moral aspects of research practice, and be inclusive of the variety of voices in society. We argue that if these dimensions are properly integrated into biomedical curricula, they will help students develop the attitudinal aspects necessary for becoming responsive, and prepare them for implementing the dimensions of responsible research into their daily practice. This paper focuses specifically on skills biomedical scientists need for the responsible conduct of research. Therefore, our analysis results, at least in part, in domain-specific recommendations. We invite educators from other disciplines to do the same exercise, as we believe this could lead to tailored educational approaches by which students from various disciplinary backgrounds learn how they each have a role in contributing to socially robust and morally responsible research practice.

摘要

生物医学领域的新发展会对社会产生广泛影响。为了将研究工作引向负责任的方向,生物医学科学家应推动对新发展进行前瞻性的伦理和社会评估。然而,问题依然存在:如何让学生充分具备为这种评估做出贡献所需的技能。在本文中,我们探讨负责任研究与创新的四个维度(前瞻性、反思性、包容性和响应性)如何为确定有助于培养生物医学科学家这些技能的学习目标和教学方法提供信息。我们建议这些教育方法应侧重于预测预期和非预期结果的技能、反思研究实践的认识论和道德层面的技能,以及包容社会中各种声音的技能。我们认为,如果将这些维度妥善融入生物医学课程,它们将有助于学生培养做出响应所需的态度层面的能力,并使他们为将负责任研究的维度落实到日常实践做好准备。本文特别关注生物医学科学家进行负责任研究所需的技能。因此,我们的分析至少部分得出了针对特定领域的建议。我们邀请其他学科的教育工作者也开展同样的工作,因为我们相信这可能会产生量身定制的教育方法,使来自不同学科背景的学生了解他们各自在为社会稳健且道德上负责任的研究实践做出贡献方面所扮演的角色。

相似文献

1
Educating for Responsible Research Practice in Biomedical Sciences: Towards Learning Goals.生物医学科学领域负责任研究实践的教育:迈向学习目标
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(4):977-996. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00295-y. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
6
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
7
Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.重新思考天赋和英才教育:基于心理科学的前进方向建议。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011 Jan;12(1):3-54. doi: 10.1177/1529100611418056.
8
Teaching Autistic Adolescents and Young Adults to Drive: Perspectives of Specialized Driving Instructors.教自闭症青少年和青年驾驶:专业驾驶教练的观点。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Sep 1;1(3):202-209. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0054. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
9
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
10
Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists.研究中考虑伦理和社会影响的障碍:生命科学家的看法。
AJOB Prim Res. 2012;3(3):40-50. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2012.680651. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Translation of Bio-Artificial Pancreas Therapies: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Interdisciplinary Considerations and Key Recommendations.生物人工胰腺治疗的临床转化:伦理、法律和心理社会多学科的考虑因素和关键建议。
Transpl Int. 2023 Sep 18;36:11705. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11705. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Recognizing the ethical implications of stem cell research: A call for broadening the scope.认识到干细胞研究的伦理含义:呼吁扩大研究范围。
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):1656-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.伦理平行研究:一种用于生物医学创新(早期)伦理指导的方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z.
3
From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists.从科学传播的“赤字”到对话:对话传播模式需要科学家扮演更多角色。
EMBO Rep. 2020 Sep 3;21(9):e51278. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051278. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Train PhD students to be thinkers not just specialists.培养博士生成为有思想的人,而不仅仅是专家。
Nature. 2018 Feb;554(7692):277. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-01853-1.
5
Real-time ethics engagement in biomedical research: Ethics from bench to bedside.实时生物医学研究中的伦理学参与:从实验室到临床。
EMBO Rep. 2020 Feb 5;21(2):e49919. doi: 10.15252/embr.201949919. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
6
Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.跨学科研究的认识论——科学哲学范式的转变
Eur J Philos Sci. 2019;9(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Interdisciplinary expertise in medical practice: Challenges of using and producing knowledge in complex problem-solving.医学实践中的跨学科专业知识:在复杂问题解决中使用和产生知识的挑战。
Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):668-677. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1544417. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
8
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
9
Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices.元研究:研究方法与实践的评估和改进
PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 2;13(10):e1002264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264. eCollection 2015 Oct.
10
Integration of Ethics across the Curriculum: From First Year through Senior Seminar.跨课程的伦理整合:从大一到大四研讨课
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):218-23. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.850. eCollection 2014 Dec.