Suppr超能文献

罕见病的药物再利用:学术界的作用。

Drug Repurposing for Rare Diseases: A Role for Academia.

作者信息

van den Berg Sibren, de Visser Saco, Leufkens Hubert G M, Hollak Carla E M

机构信息

Medicine for Society, Platform at Amsterdam UMC-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 20;12:746987. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.746987. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The European Commission highlights in its Pharmaceutical Strategy the role of academic researchers in drug repurposing, especially in the development of orphan medicinal products (OMPs). This study summarizes the contribution of academia over the last 5 years to registered repurposed OMPs and describes barriers to success, based upon three real world cases. OMPs granted marketing authorization between January 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed for repurposing and whether the idea originated from academia or industry. Three cases of drug repurposing were selected from different therapeutic areas and stages of development to identify obstacles to success. Thirteen of the 68 OMPs were the result of drug repurposing. In three OMPs, there were two developments such as both a new indication and a modified application. In total, twelve developments originated from academia and four from industry. The three cases showed as barriers to success: lack of outlook for sufficient return of investments (abatacept), lack of regulatory alignment and timing of interaction between healthcare professionals and regulators (etidronate), failure to register an old drug for a fair price, resulting in commercialization as a high priced orphan drug (mexiletine). While the majority of repurposed OMPs originates in academia, a gap exists between healthcare professionals, regulators and industry. Future strategies should aim to overcome these hurdles leading to more patient benefit through sustainable access of repurposed drugs. Potential solutions include improved regulatory and reimbursement knowledge by academia and the right for regulators to integrate new effectiveness data into product labels.

摘要

欧盟委员会在其制药战略中强调了学术研究人员在药物重新利用方面的作用,特别是在孤儿药品(OMPs)的开发中。本研究总结了学术界在过去5年对已注册的重新利用的OMPs所做的贡献,并基于三个实际案例描述了成功的障碍。对2016年1月至2020年12月期间获得上市许可的OMPs进行了重新利用审查,以及该想法是源自学术界还是行业。从不同治疗领域和开发阶段选取了三个药物重新利用案例,以确定成功的障碍。68种OMPs中有13种是药物重新利用的结果。在三种OMPs中,有两种开发情况,如既有新适应症又有改良应用。总共有12项开发源自学术界,4项源自行业。这三个案例显示出成功的障碍包括:投资回报前景不足(阿巴西普)、缺乏监管一致性以及医疗保健专业人员与监管机构之间互动的时机(依替膦酸)、未能以公平价格注册一种旧药,导致作为高价孤儿药商业化(美西律)。虽然大多数重新利用的OMPs源自学术界,但医疗保健专业人员、监管机构和行业之间存在差距。未来的战略应旨在克服这些障碍,通过重新利用药物的可持续获取为更多患者带来益处。潜在的解决方案包括学术界提高监管和报销知识,以及监管机构有权将新的有效性数据纳入产品标签。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4641/8564285/90c1b10e59d0/fphar-12-746987-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验