van der Waal Jeanne G, Meijborg Veronique M F, Belterman Charly N W, Streekstra Geert J, Oostendorp Thom F, Coronel Ruben
Department of Experimental and Clinical Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 22;12:737609. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.737609. eCollection 2021.
The detection and localization of electrophysiological substrates currently involve invasive cardiac mapping. Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) using the equivalent dipole layer (EDL) method allows the noninvasive estimation of endocardial and epicardial activation and repolarization times (AT and RT), but the RT validation is limited to studies. We aimed to assess the temporal and spatial accuracy of the EDL method in reconstructing the RTs from the surface ECG under physiological circumstances and situations with artificially induced increased repolarization heterogeneity. In four Langendorff-perfused pig hearts, we simultaneously recorded unipolar electrograms from plunge needles and pseudo-ECGs from a volume-conducting container equipped with 61 electrodes. The RTs were computed from the ECGs during atrial and ventricular pacing and compared with those measured from the local unipolar electrograms. Regional RT prolongation (cooling) or shortening (pinacidil) was achieved by selective perfusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) region. The differences between the computed and measured RTs were 19.0 ± 17.8 and 18.6 ± 13.7 ms for atrial and ventricular paced beats, respectively. The region of artificially delayed or shortened repolarization was correctly identified, with minimum/maximum RT roughly in the center of the region in three hearts. In one heart, the reconstructed region was shifted by ~2.5 cm. The total absolute difference between the measured and calculated RTs for all analyzed patterns in selectively perfused hearts ( = 5) was 39.6 ± 27.1 ms. The noninvasive ECG repolarization imaging using the EDL method of atrial and ventricular paced beats allows adequate quantitative reconstruction of regions of altered repolarization.
目前,电生理基质的检测和定位涉及侵入性心脏标测。使用等效偶极层(EDL)方法的心电图成像(ECGI)能够非侵入性地估计心内膜和心外膜的激动和复极时间(AT和RT),但RT验证仅限于研究。我们旨在评估EDL方法在生理情况下以及人为诱导复极异质性增加的情况下从体表心电图重建RTs的时间和空间准确性。在四个Langendorff灌注猪心脏中,我们同时记录了插入针的单极电图和配备61个电极的容积导电容器的伪心电图。在心房和心室起搏期间从心电图计算RTs,并与从局部单极电图测量的RTs进行比较。通过选择性灌注左前降支动脉(LAD)区域实现区域RT延长(冷却)或缩短(匹那地尔)。心房和心室起搏搏动时,计算得到的RTs与测量得到的RTs之间的差异分别为19.0±17.8和18.6±13.7 ms。人工延迟或缩短复极的区域被正确识别,在三个心脏中,最小/最大RT大致位于该区域的中心。在一个心脏中,重建区域偏移了约2.5 cm。在选择性灌注心脏(n = 5)中,所有分析模式下测量和计算的RTs之间的总绝对差异为39.6±27.1 ms。使用EDL方法对心房和心室起搏搏动进行非侵入性心电图复极成像能够对复极改变的区域进行充分的定量重建。