• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期乳腺癌局部治疗策略的时间负担差异。

Differences in Time Burden across Local Therapy Strategies for Early-stage Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Swanick Cameron W, Jiang Jing, Maldonado J Alberto, Lei Xiudong, Shih Ya-Chen Tina, Caudle Abigail S, Baumann Donald P, Giordano Sharon H, Shaitelman Simona F, Shirvani Shervin M, Smith Benjamin D

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Fla.

University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Nov 4;9(11):e3904. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003904. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003904
PMID:34745797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568370/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

"Time burden" (time required during treatment) is relevant when choosing a local therapy option for early-stage breast cancer but has not been rigorously studied. We compared the time burden for three common local therapies for breast cancer: (1) lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation (Lump+WBI), (2) mastectomy without radiation or reconstruction (Mast alone), and (3) mastectomy without radiation but with reconstruction (Mast+Recon).

METHODS

Using the MarketScan database, we identified 35,406 breast cancer patients treated from 2000 to 2011 with these local therapies. We quantified the total time burden as the sum of inpatient days (inpatient-days), outpatient days excluding radiation fractions (outpatient-days), and radiation fractions (radiation-days) in the first two years postdiagnosis. Multivariable regression evaluated the effect of local therapy on inpatient-days and outpatient-days adjusted for patient and treatment covariates.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean number of inpatient-days was 1.0 for Lump+WBI, 2.0 for Mast alone, and 3.1 for Mast+Recon ( < 0.001). Adjusted mean number of outpatient-days was 42.9 for Lump+WBI, 42.2 for Mast alone, and 45.8 for Mast+Recon ( < 0.001). The mean number of radiation-days for Lump+WBI was 32.4. Compared with Mast+Recon (48.9 days), total adjusted time burden was 4.7 days shorter for Mast alone (44.2 days) and 27.4 days longer for Lump+WBI (76.3 days). However, use of a 15 fraction WBI regimen would reduce the time burden differential between Lump+WBI and Mast+Recon to just 10.0 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Mast+Recon confers the highest inpatient and outpatient time burden, Lump+WBI carries the highest total time burden. Increased use of hypofractionation will reduce the total time burden for Lump+WBI.

摘要

未标注

在为早期乳腺癌选择局部治疗方案时,“时间负担”(治疗期间所需时间)是一个相关因素,但尚未得到严格研究。我们比较了三种常见的乳腺癌局部治疗的时间负担:(1)保乳手术加全乳照射(保乳手术+全乳照射),(2)单纯乳房切除术(不进行放疗或重建),以及(3)单纯乳房切除术(不进行放疗但进行重建)。

方法

利用MarketScan数据库,我们确定了2000年至2011年接受这些局部治疗的35406例乳腺癌患者。我们将总时间负担量化为诊断后前两年的住院天数、不包括放疗次数的门诊天数和放疗次数之和。多变量回归评估了局部治疗对住院天数和门诊天数的影响,并对患者和治疗协变量进行了调整。

结果

保乳手术+全乳照射的调整后平均住院天数为1.0天,单纯乳房切除术为2.0天,乳房切除术+重建为3.1天(<0.001)。保乳手术+全乳照射的调整后平均门诊天数为42.9天,单纯乳房切除术为42.2天,乳房切除术+重建为45.8天(<0.001)。保乳手术+全乳照射的平均放疗天数为32.4天。与乳房切除术+重建(48.9天)相比,单纯乳房切除术的调整后总时间负担短4.7天(44.2天),保乳手术+全乳照射长27.4天(76.3天)。然而,采用15次分割的全乳照射方案将使保乳手术+全乳照射与乳房切除术+重建之间的时间负担差异仅降至10.0天。

结论

虽然乳房切除术+重建带来的住院和门诊时间负担最高,但保乳手术+全乳照射的总时间负担最高。增加使用低分割放疗将减少保乳手术+全乳照射的总时间负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb11/8568370/66c60cd5403a/gox-9-e3904-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb11/8568370/0947c801dfe7/gox-9-e3904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb11/8568370/66c60cd5403a/gox-9-e3904-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb11/8568370/0947c801dfe7/gox-9-e3904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb11/8568370/66c60cd5403a/gox-9-e3904-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in Time Burden across Local Therapy Strategies for Early-stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌局部治疗策略的时间负担差异。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Nov 4;9(11):e3904. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003904. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Survey Study.老年乳腺癌幸存者的长期患者报告结局:一项基于人群的调查研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 15;100(4):882-890. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.047. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
Cost and Complications of Local Therapies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌局部治疗的成本与并发症
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Sep 27;109(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw178. Print 2017 Jan.
4
Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013.美国保乳手术后采用低分割与常规全乳照射的摄取率和成本:2008-2013 年。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2542-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16616.
5
Utilization trend and regimens of hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy in the United States.美国大分割全乳放疗的使用趋势及方案
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;162(2):317-328. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4120-0. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
6
Local control in young women with early-stage breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation.早期乳腺癌年轻女性采用Hypofractionated 全乳照射的局部控制。
Breast. 2018 Oct;41:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
7
Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Conventional, Hypofractionated, and Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌常规放疗、低分割放疗与术中放疗的成本效果分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Nov 1;109(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx068.
8
Adjuvant hypofractionated versus conventional whole breast radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: long-term hospital-related morbidity from cardiac causes.早期乳腺癌辅助性低分割与常规全乳放射治疗比较:心脏相关原因导致的长期住院相关发病率。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):786-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.243.
9
Expenditures and Use of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Treating Breast Cancer Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees, 2009 to 2017.2009年至2017年医疗保险优势参保者中乳腺癌大分割放射治疗的支出与使用情况
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;9(9):101568. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101568. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Acute and Short-term Toxic Effects of Conventionally Fractionated vs Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.常规分割与低分割全乳放疗的急性和短期毒性效应:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):931-41. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2666.

引用本文的文献

1
Logistic and time burdens reported by gynecologic and breast cancer survivors.妇科和乳腺癌幸存者报告的后勤和时间负担。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03826-9.
2
Logistic burdens of cancer care: A qualitative study.癌症护理的逻辑负担:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0300852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300852. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-Year Outcomes With Hypofractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: Results of a Randomized, Noninferiority Clinical Trial.大分割与常规分割全乳照射的三年结局:一项随机、非劣效性临床试验的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 31;36(35):JCO1800317. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00317.
2
Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW trial): 5-year results from a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.早期乳腺癌保乳手术后部分乳房放疗的疗效(英国 IMPORT LOW 试验):一项多中心、随机、对照、3 期、非劣效性临床试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1048-1060. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31145-5. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
3
Cost and Complications of Local Therapies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌局部治疗的成本与并发症
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Sep 27;109(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw178. Print 2017 Jan.
4
Influential Forces in Breast Cancer Surgical Decision Making and the Impact on Body Image and Sexual Function.乳腺癌手术决策中的影响因素及其对身体形象和性功能的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3403-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5365-2. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
Acute and Short-term Toxic Effects of Conventionally Fractionated vs Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.常规分割与低分割全乳放疗的急性和短期毒性效应:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):931-41. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2666.
6
Differences in the Acute Toxic Effects of Breast Radiotherapy by Fractionation Schedule: Comparative Analysis of Physician-Assessed and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Large Multicenter Cohort.不同分割方案的乳腺癌放疗急性毒性效应差异:大型多中心队列中医生评估和患者报告结局的比较分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):918-30. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2590.
7
Early Postoperative Outcomes in Breast Conservation Surgery Versus Simple Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction: A NSQIP Analysis of 11,645 Patients.保乳手术与单纯乳房切除加植入物重建的术后早期结果:对11645例患者的美国国立外科质量改进计划分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):92-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4770-2. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
8
Reoperation for Complications after Lumpectomy and Mastectomy for Breast Cancer from the 2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).基于2012年美国国立外科质量改进计划(美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划,ACS-NSQIP)的乳腺癌保乳手术和乳房切除术后并发症再手术情况
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S459-69. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4741-7. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
9
Patient-reported Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Cosmetic Outcomes After Breast Conservation and Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction: Results of a Survey of Breast Cancer Survivors.保乳术及乳房切除术(无论是否进行重建)后患者报告的生活质量及对美容效果的满意度:乳腺癌幸存者的调查结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1198-206. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000908.
10
Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013.美国保乳手术后采用低分割与常规全乳照射的摄取率和成本:2008-2013 年。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2542-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16616.