Rossita Annuri, Nurrochmat Dodik Ridho, Boer Rizaldi, Hein Lars, Riqqi Akhmad
Applied Climatology Study Program, the Graduate School of IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Center for Climate Risk and Opportunity Management in South East Asia and Pacific (CCROM-SEAP), IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 19;7(10):e08208. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08208. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Peatland plays a pivotal role in providing natural resource production and environmental services for human welfare. However, many studies have mentioned the impact of dryland cultivation in peatland on the shifting carbon balance in the ecosystem that clearly will alter the interaction of these two ecosystem services. The goal of this study, conducted under the framework of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) framework, was to monetary value the ecosystem services (ES) of provisioning and carbon regulating services of the Gaung-Batang Tuaka Peat Hydrological Unit (KHG). We focused on KHG in response to Regulation No.57/2016, which highlights ecosystem boundary as a new basis for peatland management. Under the SEEA framework, ecosystem services become a benefit when utilized by ecosystem beneficiaries. In this case, provisioning services will be valued only for cultivated land, while carbon services calculated for the entire study area (global beneficiaries). Our study showed that the provisioning services and carbon services are under the trade-off condition, where the monetary value of provisioning services increased at a slower rate (0.50 million USD annually) than the monetary loss of the benefit of carbon services (5.28 million USD annually), greatly exceeded the monetary value of provisioning services. We highlight two main strategies to increase the monetary value of the KHG towards a synergy condition, namely increased value-added by reducing the productivity gap among ES beneficiaries and large-scale adoption of a profitable cultivation system with minimum peat disturbance. The main enablers required include financing access and incentives (e.g., reduce tax) and disincentives to allow for peat-adaptive commodities to compete with dryland commodities in the future market.
泥炭地在为人类福祉提供自然资源生产和环境服务方面发挥着关键作用。然而,许多研究都提到了泥炭地旱地开垦对生态系统中碳平衡变化的影响,这显然会改变这两种生态系统服务之间的相互作用。本研究在环境经济核算体系(SEEA)框架下进行,旨在对广巴塘图阿卡泥炭水文单元(KHG)的供给和碳调节服务的生态系统服务(ES)进行货币估值。我们关注KHG是为了响应第57/2016号条例,该条例强调生态系统边界是泥炭地管理的新基础。在SEEA框架下,生态系统服务被生态系统受益者利用时就会成为一种效益。在这种情况下,供给服务仅对耕地进行估值,而碳服务则针对整个研究区域(全球受益者)进行计算。我们的研究表明,供给服务和碳服务处于权衡状态,其中供给服务的货币价值增长速度较慢(每年50万美元),低于碳服务效益的货币损失(每年528万美元),碳服务效益的货币损失大大超过了供给服务的货币价值。我们强调了两种主要策略,以使KHG的货币价值朝着协同状态增加,即通过缩小生态系统服务受益者之间的生产力差距来增加附加值,以及大规模采用对泥炭干扰最小的盈利性种植系统。所需的主要推动因素包括融资渠道和激励措施(如减税)以及抑制措施,以便让适应泥炭地的商品在未来市场上能够与旱地商品竞争。