• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不确定性下风险决策中的即时情绪与主观利害关系。

Immediate emotions and subjective stakes in risky decision-making under uncertainty.

作者信息

Zhang Bolun, Shou Yiyun

机构信息

Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022 Nov;35(6):649-661. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1994143. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1080/10615806.2021.1994143
PMID:34747282
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that immediate emotions and cognitive processing of the stakes of outcomes influence decision-making under uncertainty. The effect of perceived beneficial stakes and different types of immediate emotions on decision-making is an important topic that has received little attention in the literature. This study investigated the effects of trait anxiety and anticipatory emotions (fear, sadness, excitement and comfortability) on the perception of thee stakes of outcomes and behavioral intentions.

METHOD

Participants from the community completed a task measuring anticipatory emotions and their perceived stakes of risky and beneficial outcomes in a range of uncertain situations. Trait anxiety was also measured.

RESULTS

Results revealed that anticipatory emotions (except for sadness), trait anxiety and subjective stakes all demonstrated significant associations with risky behavioral intention in uncertain situations. Anticipatory emotions, but not trait anxiety, had stable effects on stake perceptions. However, trait anxiety moderated the effect of excitement on risky behavioral intention. In addition, positive emotions (comfortability and excitement) and beneficial stakes demonstrated consistent effects in the decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study sheds light on future immediate-emotion-based interventions for deficits in uncertain decision-making.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,即时情绪以及对结果利害关系的认知加工会影响不确定情况下的决策。感知到的有益利害关系和不同类型的即时情绪对决策的影响是一个在文献中很少受到关注的重要课题。本研究调查了特质焦虑和预期情绪(恐惧、悲伤、兴奋和舒适感)对结果利害关系认知及行为意图的影响。

方法

来自社区的参与者完成了一项任务,该任务测量了一系列不确定情况下的预期情绪及其对风险和有益结果的利害关系认知。同时也测量了特质焦虑。

结果

结果显示,预期情绪(悲伤除外)、特质焦虑和主观利害关系在不确定情况下均与风险行为意图表现出显著关联。预期情绪而非特质焦虑对利害关系认知有稳定影响。然而,特质焦虑调节了兴奋对风险行为意图的影响。此外,积极情绪(舒适感和兴奋)和有益利害关系在决策过程中表现出一致的影响。

结论

本研究为未来基于即时情绪的不确定决策缺陷干预提供了启示。

相似文献

1
Immediate emotions and subjective stakes in risky decision-making under uncertainty.不确定性下风险决策中的即时情绪与主观利害关系。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022 Nov;35(6):649-661. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1994143. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
The role of future-oriented affect in engagement with genomic testing results.未来导向情感在参与基因组检测结果中的作用。
J Behav Med. 2022 Feb;45(1):103-114. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00253-7. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
3
The influence of incidental emotions on decision-making under risk and uncertainty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental evidence.偶然情绪对风险和不确定性下决策的影响:实验证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Sep;36(6):1054-1073. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2099349. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
Economic Decisions with Ambiguous Outcome Magnitudes Vary with Low and High Stakes but Not Trait Anxiety or Depression.结果幅度不明确时的经济决策因风险高低而异,与特质焦虑或抑郁无关。
Comput Psychiatr. 2021 Oct 21;5(1):119-139. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.79. eCollection 2021.
5
Trait anger and anger expression style in children's risky decisions.儿童冒险决策中的特质愤怒与愤怒表达风格
Aggress Behav. 2009 Jan-Feb;35(1):14-23. doi: 10.1002/ab.20285.
6
Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty.情绪调节与风险和不确定性下的决策。
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):257-65. doi: 10.1037/a0018489.
7
Anticipatory emotions in decision tasks: covert markers of value or attentional processes?决策任务中的预期情绪:价值的隐蔽标记还是注意过程?
Cognition. 2009 Jul;112(1):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 9.
8
Relationships between affective states and decision-making.情感状态与决策之间的关系。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
9
Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential.偶然出现的积极情绪是否会诱导人们对决策结果产生更乐观的期望?一项源于事件相关电位的实证研究。
Brain Behav. 2024 Apr;14(4):e3491. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3491.
10
Anticipatory anxiety disrupts neural valuation during risky choice.预期性焦虑会在风险选择过程中扰乱神经评估。
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3085-99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2880-14.2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating certainty via verbal probability phrases: comparing health contexts with no context.通过言语概率短语传达确定性:将健康情境与无情境进行比较。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02687-9.
2
Informed consent and risk communication challenges in antimicrobial clinical trials: a scoping review.知情同意和风险沟通在抗菌药物临床试验中的挑战:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 24;14(11):e082096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082096.
3
How Do Paediatricians Manage Comfort with Uncertainty in Clinical Decision-Making.
儿科医生如何在临床决策中应对不确定性时感到舒适。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 22;13(1):527-539. doi: 10.5334/pme.1394. eCollection 2024.