Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33406.
Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not; furthermore, many older adults have limited knowledge of the potential harms of continuing to be screened.
To summarize the patient-reported factors associated with older adults' decisions regarding screening for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancer.
Studies were identified by searching databases from January 2000 to June 2020 and were independently assessed for inclusion by 2 authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and then all decisions were cross-checked and discussed where necessary. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2020.
The search yielded 2475 records, of which 21 unique studies were included. Nine studies were quantitative, 8 were qualitative, and 4 used mixed method designs. Of the 21 studies, 17 were conducted in the US, and 10 of 21 assessed breast cancer screening decisions only. Factors associated with decision-making were synthesized into 5 categories: demographic, health and clinical, psychological, physician, and social and system. Commonly identified factors associated with the decision to undergo screening included personal or family history of cancer, positive screening attitudes, routine or habit, to gain knowledge, friends, and a physician's recommendation. Factors associated with the decision to forgo screening included being older, negative screening attitudes, and desire not to know about cancer. Some factors had varying associations, including insurance coverage, living in a nursing home, prior screening experience, health problems, limited life expectancy, perceived cancer risk, risks of screening, family, and a physician's recommendation to stop.
Although guidelines suggest incorporating life expectancy and health status to inform older adults' cancer screening decisions, older adults' ingrained beliefs about screening may run counter to these concepts. Communication strategies are needed that support older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions by addressing underlying screening beliefs in context with their perceived and actual risk of developing cancer.
对于老年人(年龄≥65 岁)及其临床医生来说,关于是否继续进行癌症筛查的决策并不容易。尽管指南建议不应对虚弱或预期寿命有限或患有合并症的老年人进行癌症筛查,但许多此类老年人仍在继续接受癌症筛查;此外,许多老年人对继续筛查的潜在危害知之甚少。
总结与老年人决定进行乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查相关的患者报告因素。
通过从 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月搜索数据库,确定了研究,并由两位作者独立评估纳入情况。两位作者独立进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估,然后对所有决策进行交叉核对,并在必要时进行讨论。数据分析于 2020 年 9 月至 12 月进行。
搜索结果产生了 2475 条记录,其中包括 21 项独特的研究。9 项研究为定量研究,8 项为定性研究,4 项采用混合方法设计。在 21 项研究中,17 项在美国进行,其中 10 项仅评估了乳腺癌筛查决策。将决策因素综合为 5 类:人口统计学、健康和临床、心理、医生和社会及系统。普遍确定与接受筛查决定相关的因素包括个人或家族癌症史、对筛查的积极态度、常规或习惯、获取知识、朋友和医生的建议。与决定不进行筛查相关的因素包括年龄较大、对筛查的消极态度和不希望了解癌症。一些因素的关联存在差异,包括保险范围、居住在养老院、既往筛查经验、健康问题、预期寿命有限、感知癌症风险、筛查风险、家庭以及医生建议停止。
尽管指南建议将预期寿命和健康状况纳入考虑,以告知老年人的癌症筛查决策,但老年人对筛查的根深蒂固的信念可能与这些概念相悖。需要沟通策略来支持老年人做出明智的癌症筛查决策,方法是在考虑到其感知和实际癌症风险的情况下,解决潜在的筛查信念问题。