• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁控胶囊内镜评估抗血小板治疗诱导的胃肠道损伤。

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy for Assessment of Antiplatelet Therapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury.

机构信息

General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.028. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.028
PMID:34752902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most frequent major complication of antiplatelet therapy. In patients at low bleeding risk, however, clinically overt gastrointestinal bleeding is relatively uncommon.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to assess the effects of different antiplatelet regimens on gastrointestinal mucosal injury by means of a novel magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy system in patients at low bleeding risk.

METHODS

Patients (n = 505) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in whom capsule endoscopy demonstrated no ulcerations or bleeding (although erosions were permitted) after 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were randomly assigned to aspirin plus placebo (n = 168), clopidogrel plus placebo (n = 169), or aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 168) for an additional 6 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of gastrointestinal mucosal injury (erosions, ulceration, or bleeding) at 6-month or 12-month capsule endoscopy.

RESULTS

Gastrointestinal mucosal injury through 12 months was less with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) than with DAPT (94.3% vs 99.2%; P = 0.02). Aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapy had similar effects. Among 68 patients without any gastrointestinal injury at randomization (including no erosions), SAPT compared with DAPT caused less gastrointestinal injury (68.1% vs 95.2%; P = 0.006), including fewer new ulcers (8.5% vs 38.1%; P = 0.009). Clinical gastrointestinal bleeding from 6 to 12 months was less with SAPT than with DAPT (0.6% vs 5.4%; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being at low risk of bleeding, nearly all patients receiving antiplatelet therapy developed gastrointestinal injury, although overt bleeding was infrequent. DAPT for 6 months followed by SAPT with aspirin or clopidogrel from 6 to 12 months resulted in less gastrointestinal mucosal injury and clinical bleeding compared with DAPT through 12 months. (OPT-PEACE [Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Gastrointestinal Injury Evaluated by Ankon Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy]; NCT03198741).

摘要

背景

胃肠道出血是抗血小板治疗最常见的主要并发症。然而,在低出血风险的患者中,临床上明显的胃肠道出血相对少见。

目的

作者通过新型磁控胶囊内镜系统评估不同抗血小板方案对低出血风险患者胃肠黏膜损伤的影响。

方法

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,505 例患者在接受 6 个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后行胶囊内镜检查,结果未见溃疡或出血(尽管允许有糜烂),随后被随机分配至阿司匹林+安慰剂组(n=168)、氯吡格雷+安慰剂组(n=169)或阿司匹林+氯吡格雷组(n=168),继续进行 6 个月的治疗。主要终点为 6 个月或 12 个月胶囊内镜检查时胃肠道黏膜损伤(糜烂、溃疡或出血)的发生率。

结果

12 个月时,单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT)组的胃肠道黏膜损伤发生率低于 DAPT 组(94.3% vs 99.2%;P=0.02)。阿司匹林和氯吡格雷单药治疗的效果相似。在随机分组时无任何胃肠道损伤(包括无糜烂)的 68 例患者中,SAPT 组较 DAPT 组胃肠道损伤更少(68.1% vs 95.2%;P=0.006),新发溃疡更少(8.5% vs 38.1%;P=0.009)。6 至 12 个月时,SAPT 组较 DAPT 组临床胃肠道出血更少(0.6% vs 5.4%;P=0.001)。

结论

尽管出血风险较低,但几乎所有接受抗血小板治疗的患者都出现了胃肠道损伤,尽管明显出血并不常见。DAPT 治疗 6 个月后,在 6 至 12 个月期间改为阿司匹林或氯吡格雷的 SAPT 治疗与 12 个月时的 DAPT 相比,胃肠道黏膜损伤和临床出血更少。(OPT-PEACE [通过 Ankon 磁控胶囊内镜评估的最佳抗血小板治疗预防胃肠道损伤];NCT03198741)。

相似文献

1
Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy for Assessment of Antiplatelet Therapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury.磁控胶囊内镜评估抗血小板治疗诱导的胃肠道损伤。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.028. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
2
Progression of Gastrointestinal Injury During Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Secondary Analysis of the OPT-PEACE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗期间胃肠道损伤的进展:OPT-PEACE 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43219.
3
Optimal antiplatelet therapy for prevention of gastrointestinal injury evaluated by ANKON magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: Rationale and design of the OPT-PEACE trial.采用 ANKON 磁控胶囊内镜评估预防胃肠道损伤的最佳抗血小板治疗:OPT-PEACE 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Extended antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel alone versus clopidogrel plus aspirin after completion of 9- to 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome patients with both high bleeding and ischemic risk. Rationale and design of the OPT-BIRISK double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial.急性冠脉综合征伴高出血和缺血风险患者完成 9-12 个月双联抗血小板治疗后,单用氯吡格雷与氯吡格雷加阿司匹林进行延长抗血小板治疗的效果比较:OPT-BIRISK 双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
7
Indian Perspective on De-escalation from Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Single Antiplatelet Therapy Study: A Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Study among Indian Interventional Cardiologists.印度关于双联抗血小板治疗向单联抗血小板治疗降级的观点:印度介入心脏病学家的知识、态度和实践研究。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Apr;72(4):68-78. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0515.
8
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
9
Long-term dual antiplatelet-induced intestinal injury resulting in translocation of intestinal bacteria into blood circulation increased the incidence of adverse events after PCI in patients with coronary artery disease.长期双联抗血小板治疗导致的肠道损伤使肠道细菌易位进入血液循环,增加了冠心病患者 PCI 术后不良事件的发生率。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Jul;328:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Aspirin Versus Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel as Antithrombotic Treatment Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve: The ARTE (Aspirin Versus Aspirin + Clopidogrel Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后抗栓治疗:阿司匹林与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷的疗效对比(ARTE 研究):一项随机临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1357-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Which antiplatelet is better after stents? A meta-analysis of aspirin vs clopidogrel in the maintenance phase.支架置入术后哪种抗血小板药物更好?阿司匹林与氯吡格雷维持期应用的荟萃分析。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04386-3.
2
PPI in preventing gastrointestinal injury in minor ischemic stroke or TIA patients at low risk of gastrointestinal bleeding treated with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.质子泵抑制剂在预防轻度缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作且胃肠道出血风险较低的患者接受短期双重抗血小板治疗时发生胃肠道损伤中的作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 30;16:1644148. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1644148. eCollection 2025.
3
Position Statement on Antiplatelet Therapy for East Asians With Coronary Artery Disease: 2025 Update.
《2025年东亚冠状动脉疾病患者抗血小板治疗立场声明更新版》
JACC Asia. 2025 Jul;5(7):821-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.010.
4
Platelets in cancer and immunotherapy: functional dynamics and therapeutic opportunities.癌症与免疫疗法中的血小板:功能动态与治疗机遇
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jun 13;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40164-025-00676-x.
5
Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Atrial Fibrillation: Potential Ideal Target for Epicardial Appendage Occlusion.胃肠道出血合并心房颤动患者:心外膜附属器封堵的潜在理想靶点。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 1;12(5):173. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050173.
6
Superior gastrointestinal visualization and safety of detachable string magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy in patients on antithrombotic agents.抗血栓药物治疗患者中可分离式磁控胶囊内镜的上消化道可视化效果及安全性
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 30;12:1578285. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1578285. eCollection 2025.
7
Multi-omics perspective: mechanisms of gastrointestinal injury repair.多组学视角:胃肠道损伤修复机制
Burns Trauma. 2025 Jan 22;13:tkae057. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae057. eCollection 2025.
8
Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后胃肠道出血:发生率、危险因素及结局
Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70248. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70248. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Application of small-sized magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy in upper gastrointestinal diseases screening in asymptomatic individuals.小型磁控胶囊胃镜在无症状个体上消化道疾病筛查中的应用
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7382-7388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11350-4. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
10
Effects of alteplase and aspirin on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke and mild non-disabling neurological deficit.阿替普酶和阿司匹林对伴有轻度非致残性神经功能缺损的急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e37307. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037307.