Department of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands.
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Feb;91(2):356-366. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13632. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Variation in foraging tactics and diet is usually attributed to differences in morphology, experience and prey availability. Recently, consistent individual differences in behaviour (personality) have been shown to be associated with foraging strategies. Bolder or more exploratory individuals are predicted to have a faster pace-of-life and offset the costs of moving more or in risky areas, with higher energetic gains by encountering profitable foraging opportunities and prey. However, the relationship between personality, foraging and diet is poorly understood. We investigated how exploratory behaviour in red knots Calidris canutus is associated with foraging tactics and diet by combining laboratory experiments, field observations and stable isotope analysis. First, we developed a mobile experimental arena to measure exploration speed in controlled settings. We validated the method by repeated testing of individuals over time and contexts. This setup allowed us to measure exploratory personality at the field site, eliminating the need to bring birds into captivity for long periods of time. After releasing birds within days of their capture, we asked whether exploration speed was associated with differences in foraging tactics and diet in the wild. We found that tactile foraging red knots mainly caught hard-shelled prey that are buried in the sediment, whereas visual foraging knots only captured soft preys located close to or on the surface. We also found that faster explorers showed a higher percentage of visual foraging than slower explorers. By contrast, morphology (bill length and gizzard size) had no significant effect on foraging tactics. Diet analysis based on δ N and δ C stable isotope values of plasma and red blood cells confirmed our field observations with slower explorers mainly consumed hard-shelled prey while faster explorers consumed more soft than hard-shelled prey. Our results show that foraging tactics and diet are associated with a personality trait, independent of morphological differences. We discuss how consistent behaviour might develop early in life through positive feedbacks between foraging tactics, prey type and foraging efficiency.
觅食策略和饮食的变化通常归因于形态、经验和猎物可获得性的差异。最近,行为(个性)的一致个体差异已被证明与觅食策略有关。更勇敢或更具探索性的个体预计会有更快的生活节奏,并通过遇到有利可图的觅食机会和猎物来弥补更多或在危险区域移动的成本,以及获得更高的能量收益。然而,个性、觅食和饮食之间的关系还知之甚少。我们通过结合实验室实验、野外观察和稳定同位素分析,研究了红腹滨鹬 Calidris canutus 的探索行为如何与觅食策略和饮食相关。首先,我们开发了一个移动实验场,以在受控环境中测量探索速度。我们通过个体在不同时间和环境下的重复测试验证了该方法。这种设置允许我们在野外测量探索性个性,无需长时间将鸟类关在笼子里。在捕获鸟类后的几天内将它们释放,我们询问探索速度是否与野外觅食策略和饮食的差异有关。我们发现,触觉觅食的红腹滨鹬主要捕食埋在沉积物中的硬壳猎物,而视觉觅食的红腹滨鹬只捕食位于靠近或表面的软猎物。我们还发现,探索速度较快的个体比探索速度较慢的个体表现出更高比例的视觉觅食。相比之下,形态(喙长和肌胃大小)对觅食策略没有显著影响。基于血浆和红细胞的δ N 和 δ C 稳定同位素值的饮食分析证实了我们的野外观察结果,即探索速度较慢的个体主要食用硬壳猎物,而探索速度较快的个体则食用更多的软壳猎物而非硬壳猎物。我们的研究结果表明,觅食策略和饮食与个性特征有关,而与形态差异无关。我们讨论了一致的行为如何通过觅食策略、猎物类型和觅食效率之间的正反馈机制在生命早期发展。