• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊部门出院的患者及其家属在 24 小时内的需求和偏好是什么?一种以家庭为中心的方法的定性研究。

What are the needs and preferences of patients and family members discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours? A qualitative study towards a family-centred approach.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e050694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050694.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050694
PMID:34753758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578985/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is an increase in patients being discharged after short stays in the emergency department, but there is limited knowledge of their perspectives on treatment and care. This study aims to explore and understand the needs and preferences of emergency care from the perspective of patients and family members discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours of admission.

DESIGN

The study reports from the first phase in an overall participatory design project. Systematic text condensation was used to identify key themes from field observations and interviews with patients and family members.

SETTING

This study was conducted in two emergency departments in the Region of Southern Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

All adults aged ≥18 years who had been discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours were eligible to take part. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit patients and family members with different sociodemographic features.

RESULTS

Field observational studies (n=50 hours), individual interviews with patients (N=19) and family members (N=3), and joint interviews with patients and family members (N=4) were carried out. Four themes were derived from the material: (1) being in a vulnerable place-having emotional concerns; (2) having a need for person-centred information; (3) the atmosphere in the emergency department and (4) implications of family presence.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a gap between patients' and family members' needs and preferences and what current emergency departments deliver. The findings highlight the importance of family and person-centred care. Tailored communication and information with genuine involvement of family members is found to be essential needs during acute illness.

摘要

目的

在急诊科短时间住院的患者人数不断增加,但人们对他们对治疗和护理的看法知之甚少。本研究旨在从急诊科 24 小时内出院的患者和家属的角度探讨和了解对急诊护理的需求和偏好。

设计

本研究是一个整体参与式设计项目的第一阶段报告。系统文本浓缩用于从患者和家属的实地观察和访谈中识别关键主题。

设置

本研究在丹麦南部地区的两个急诊科进行。

参与者

所有年龄≥18 岁、在 24 小时内从急诊科出院的成年人都有资格参加。采用目的性抽样方法招募具有不同社会人口学特征的患者和家属。

结果

进行了现场观察研究(n=50 小时)、对患者(n=19)和家属(n=3)的个人访谈以及对患者和家属的联合访谈(n=4)。从材料中得出了四个主题:(1)处于弱势地位——情绪担忧;(2)需要以人为本的信息;(3)急诊室的氛围;(4)家属在场的影响。

结论

本研究表明,患者和家属的需求和偏好与当前急诊科提供的服务之间存在差距。研究结果强调了家庭和以人为本护理的重要性。研究发现,在急性疾病期间,量身定制的沟通和信息以及真正让家属参与是至关重要的需求。

相似文献

1
What are the needs and preferences of patients and family members discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours? A qualitative study towards a family-centred approach.在急诊部门出院的患者及其家属在 24 小时内的需求和偏好是什么?一种以家庭为中心的方法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e050694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050694.
2
Health professionals' perspectives of patients' and family members' needs in emergency departments and patient pathway improvement: a qualitative study in Denmark.健康专业人员对急诊科患者和家属需求及患者流程改进的观点:丹麦的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 28;12(2):e057937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057937.
3
How to improve emergency care to adults discharged within 24 hours? Acute Care planning in Emergency departments (The ACE study): a protocol of a participatory design study.如何提高在 24 小时内出院的成年患者的急救护理水平?急诊科急性护理计划(ACE 研究):一项参与式设计研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e041743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041743.
4
Family members' perceptions of older person discharge from emergency departments.家庭成员对老年人从急诊科出院的看法。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 May;16(3):e12365. doi: 10.1111/opn.12365. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Reasons for returning to the emergency department following discharge from an internal medicine unit: perspectives of patients and the liaison nurse clinician.从内科病房出院后返回急诊科的原因:患者及联络护士临床医生的观点
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Dec;24(23-24):3605-14. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13011. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
6
Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers.患者出院时得到妥善照料了吗?一项关于患者、家属及护理人员认知与体验的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i39-49. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001165. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
7
From the emergency department to home.从急诊科到家中。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):776-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01129.x.
8
Family needs during critical illness in the Emergency Department: A retrospective factor analysis of data from three countries.急诊科危重病患者家庭需求:来自三个国家数据的回顾性因素分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(15-16):2813-2823. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14857. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Exploring patients and family members' experiences of care in the emergency department.探讨患者和家属在急诊科的护理体验。
Emerg Nurse. 2020 Sep 8;28(5):23-27. doi: 10.7748/en.2020.e2008. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective Health Communication to Reduce Avoidable Readmission: Enhancing Understanding for Patients and Families.有效的健康沟通以减少可避免的再入院:增强患者及其家属的理解。
Nurs Open. 2025 Mar;12(3):e70187. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70187.
2
Fundamental care in the emergency room: insights from patients with life-threatening conditions in the emergency room.急诊基础护理:来自急诊有生命威胁状况患者的见解。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 17;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01133-4.
3
Usability and Evaluation of a Health Information System in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.在急诊室中使用和评估健康信息系统的实用性:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Feb 21;11:e48445. doi: 10.2196/48445.
4
Patient Involvement in Decisions regarding Emergency Department Discharge: A Multimethod Study.患者参与急诊科出院决策:一项多方法研究。
Emerg Med Int. 2023 Jun 6;2023:4997401. doi: 10.1155/2023/4997401. eCollection 2023.
5
Development of a health information system to promote emergency care pathways: A participatory design study.开发促进急诊护理路径的健康信息系统:一项参与式设计研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Dec 26;8:20552076221145856. doi: 10.1177/20552076221145856. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Health professionals' perspectives of patients' and family members' needs in emergency departments and patient pathway improvement: a qualitative study in Denmark.健康专业人员对急诊科患者和家属需求及患者流程改进的观点:丹麦的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 28;12(2):e057937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057937.

本文引用的文献

1
How to improve emergency care to adults discharged within 24 hours? Acute Care planning in Emergency departments (The ACE study): a protocol of a participatory design study.如何提高在 24 小时内出院的成年患者的急救护理水平?急诊科急性护理计划(ACE 研究):一项参与式设计研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e041743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041743.
2
Experiences of an Emergency Department Visit Among Older Adults and Their Families: Qualitative Findings From a Mixed-Methods Study.老年人及其家庭急诊就诊经历:一项混合方法研究的定性结果
J Patient Exp. 2020 Jun;7(3):346-356. doi: 10.1177/2374373519837238. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
3
Interventions in overcrowding of emergency departments: an overview of systematic reviews.急诊科拥挤干预措施:系统评价概述。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:66. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002342. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
Empowerment of whom? The gap between what the system provides and patient needs in hip fracture management: A healthcare professionals' lifeworld perspective.赋能给谁?髋关节骨折管理中系统提供与患者需求之间的差距:医疗保健专业人员的生活世界视角。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2020 Aug;38:100778. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100778. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Implementing Family Systems Care Through an Educational Intervention With Nurses and Midwives in Obstetrics and Gynecological Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.通过在妇产科护理中对护士和助产士进行教育干预来实施家庭系统护理:混合方法评估。
J Fam Nurs. 2020 May;26(2):138-152. doi: 10.1177/1074840720915598.
6
Development of the Uncertainty Communication Checklist: A Patient-Centered Approach to Patient Discharge From the Emergency Department.《不确定性沟通清单的制定:以患者为中心的急诊科患者出院方法》。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1026-1034. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003231.
7
Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.家庭中对急性病成年人的医院级护理:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 21;172(2):77-85. doi: 10.7326/M19-0600. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
8
Municipal Acute Units as Part of the Clinical Pathway for Older Patients.市立急症病房作为老年患者临床路径的一部分。
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Oct 29;19(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4643.
9
Meanings attributed by family and patients to family presence in emergency rooms.家庭和患者赋予急诊室中家属在场的意义。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Oct 21;72(6):1684-1691. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0814. eCollection 2019.
10
Patient's perspective on improving the quality of acute medical care: determining patient reported outcomes.患者对改善急性医疗护理质量的看法:确定患者报告的结果
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Sep 29;8(3):e000736. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000736. eCollection 2019.