Ju Hyeonwoo, Kim Hwan-Cheol, Jang Sung Wook, Won Youna, Park Shin-Goo, Leem Jong-Han
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2021 May 4;33:e15. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2021.33.e15. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between fatigue and occupational injury.
This study was conducted at a university hospital in 2014 and 2015. In 2014, the fatigue severity scale (FSS) was used to evaluate workers' fatigue levels. Later, when the same workers were examined in 2015, a questionnaire survey was conducted to determine whether they had experienced absences or treatment for work-related accidents. The χ test was used to analyse the relationship between demographic characteristics, fatigue levels, and occupational injuries. After controlling for confounders, a logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratios (ORs).
In 2014, 19,218 workers were screened during health examination and their fatigue level were evaluated using FSS questionnaires. in 2015, workers' occupational injury was evaluated. In result, men in the moderate- and high-fatigue groups, after adjusting for age, smoking and drinking habits, chronic diseases, and occupational factors such as size of company industrial classification and type of work (shift or non-shift), adjusted ORs for hospital treatment due to occupational injury were 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.24) and 2.61 (95% CI:1.68-4.06), respectively. Among men in the medium- and high-fatigue groups, the adjusted ORs for absence due to occupational injury were 2.06 (95% CI: 1.52-2.80) and 3.65 (95% CI: 2.20-6.05), respectively. No significant association was observed between fatigue and occupational injury in women.
Male workers with high fatigue levels have a higher risk of experiencing work injuries. This study suggests that active intervention be considered to prevent injuries in workers with high scores on workplace fatigue evaluation scales.
本研究旨在调查疲劳与职业伤害之间的关系。
本研究于2014年和2015年在一家大学医院进行。2014年,使用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)评估工人的疲劳水平。后来,在2015年对同一批工人进行检查时,进行了问卷调查,以确定他们是否因工作相关事故而缺勤或接受治疗。采用χ检验分析人口统计学特征、疲劳水平和职业伤害之间的关系。在控制混杂因素后,进行逻辑回归分析以计算比值比(OR)。
2014年,在健康检查期间对19218名工人进行了筛查,并使用FSS问卷评估了他们的疲劳水平。2015年,对工人的职业伤害进行了评估。结果显示,在调整年龄、吸烟和饮酒习惯、慢性病以及公司规模、行业分类和工作类型(轮班或非轮班)等职业因素后,中度和高度疲劳组的男性因职业伤害而住院治疗的调整后OR分别为1.76(95%置信区间[CI]:1.39 - 2.24)和2.61(95%CI:1.68 - 4.06)。在中度和高度疲劳组的男性中,因职业伤害而缺勤的调整后OR分别为2.06(95%CI:1.52 - 2.80)和3.65(95%CI:2.20 - 6.05)。未观察到女性的疲劳与职业伤害之间存在显著关联。
疲劳水平高的男性工人遭受工作伤害的风险更高。本研究表明,应考虑采取积极干预措施,以预防在工作场所疲劳评估量表上得分高的工人发生伤害。