• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Role of Machine Learning and Radiomics for Treatment Response Prediction in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.机器学习和影像组学在特发性正常压力脑积水治疗反应预测中的作用
Cureus. 2021 Oct 5;13(10):e18497. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18497. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Utility of MRI-based disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus scoring for predicting prognosis after surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical research.基于 MRI 的蛛网膜下腔扩大不成比例的脑积水评分对特发性正常压力脑积水手术后预后的预测价值:临床研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1436-1442. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161080. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
A combined radiomics and clinical variables model for prediction of malignancy in T2 hyperintense uterine mesenchymal tumors on MRI.基于 MRI T2 高信号子宫间质肿瘤的影像组学与临床变量联合模型预测肿瘤良恶性
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):6125-6135. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07678-9. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
One-year outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of lumboperitoneal shunt to ventriculoperitoneal shunt.特发性正常压力脑积水患者的 1 年预后:腰椎-腹腔分流术与脑室-腹腔分流术的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;125(6):1483-1492. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151894. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Disability risk or unimproved symptoms following shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: post hoc analysis of SINPHONI-2.特发性正常压力脑积水患者分流术后残疾风险或症状未改善:SINPHONI-2 的事后分析。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;126(6):2002-2009. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS16377. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods.基于多参数 MRI 的肺部病变分类:放射组学的效用及机器学习方法的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4595-4605. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06768-y. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
7
Prognostic prediction of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage using CT radiomics and machine learning.利用 CT 放射组学和机器学习预测高血压性脑出血的预后。
Brain Behav. 2021 May;11(5):e02085. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2085. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Prediction of High-Risk Cytogenetic Status in Multiple Myeloma Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Utility of Radiomics and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods.基于磁共振成像预测多发性骨髓瘤的高危细胞遗传学状态:放射组学的效用和机器学习方法的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Oct;54(4):1303-1311. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27637. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Machine Learning Assisted MRI Characterization for Diagnosis of Neonatal Acute Bilirubin Encephalopathy.机器学习辅助磁共振成像特征分析用于新生儿急性胆红素脑病的诊断
Front Neurol. 2019 Oct 1;10:1018. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01018. eCollection 2019.
10
Utilization of radiomics to predict long-term outcome of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy in adenomyosis.利用放射组学预测磁共振引导聚焦超声消融治疗子宫腺肌病的长期疗效。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan;31(1):392-402. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07076-1. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Volumetric predictors for shunt-dependency in pediatric posterior fossa tumors.小儿后颅窝肿瘤中分流依赖的容积预测指标
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 20;15(1):20235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06825-w.
2
Technological Advances for Gait and Balance in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review.正常压力脑积水步态与平衡的技术进展:一项系统综述。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 30;12(2):135. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12020135.
3
Classifying primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma using deep learning and radiomics based machine learning approach - a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用深度学习和基于影像组学的机器学习方法从胶质母细胞瘤中鉴别原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 3;12:884173. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.884173. eCollection 2022.
4
Can preoperative brain imaging features predict shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus? A PRISMA review.术前脑成像特征能否预测特发性正常压力脑积水的分流反应?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。 (注:PRISMA是一种文献检索和筛选的方法学,这里直接保留英文更合适,因为如果翻译为“系统评价与荟萃分析”可能会让不熟悉该领域的人误解其与原文意思不符,所以整体译文还是保留英文原名更好,如果非要翻译,可以在后面加注释说明。但按照你的要求,最终译文应该是:术前脑成像特征能否预测特发性正常压力脑积水的分流反应?一项PRISMA综述。 ) 这里考虑到任务要求不添加解释说明,又要准确传达意思,最合适的还是保留英文原名。最终完整译文:术前脑成像特征能否预测特发性正常压力脑积水的分流反应?一项PRISMA综述。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Nov;64(11):2119-2133. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03021-9. Epub 2022 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Status and Quality of Machine Learning-Based Radiomics Studies for Glioma Grading: A Systematic Review.基于机器学习的脑胶质瘤分级影像组学研究的现状和质量:系统评价。
Oncology. 2021;99(7):433-443. doi: 10.1159/000515597. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
SVM-Based Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Detection.基于支持向量机的正常压力脑积水检测。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Dec;31(4):1029-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00993-0. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Predicting the outcome of normal pressure hydrocephalus therapy-where do we stand?预测正常压力脑积水治疗的结果——我们目前的进展如何?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Mar;163(3):767-769. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04700-3. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Systematic volumetric analysis predicts response to CSF drainage and outcome to shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.系统体积分析可预测特发性正常压力脑积水患者对脑脊液引流的反应及分流手术的预后。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4972-4980. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07531-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Neuroimaging of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Hydrocephalus.正常压力脑积水和脑积水的神经影像学
Neurol Clin. 2020 Feb;38(1):171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Normal pressure hydrocephalus-an overview of pathophysiological mechanisms and diagnostic procedures.常压性脑积水——病理生理机制与诊断程序概述。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Dec;43(6):1451-1464. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01201-5. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
Absence of Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus, a Sharp Callosal Angle, or Other Morphologic MRI Markers Should Not Be Used to Exclude Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus from Shunt Surgery.无脑积水扩大的蛛网膜下腔、尖锐的胼胝体角或其他形态 MRI 标志物的缺失不应被用于排除特发性正常压力脑积水患者的分流手术。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jan;40(1):74-79. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5910. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Preoperative biomarkers in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus showing a favorable shunt surgery outcome.特发性正常压力脑积水患者术前的生物标志物与有利的分流手术结果相关。
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Apr 15;387:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.用于解码影像学表型的计算放射组学系统
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339.
10
The Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Based on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Lumbar Infusion.基于颅内压监测和腰椎穿刺灌注对特发性正常压力脑积水分流反应的预测
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:267-74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_53.

机器学习和影像组学在特发性正常压力脑积水治疗反应预测中的作用

The Role of Machine Learning and Radiomics for Treatment Response Prediction in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

作者信息

Sotoudeh Houman, Sadaatpour Zahra, Rezaei Ali, Shafaat Omid, Sotoudeh Ehsan, Tabatabaie Mohsen, Singhal Aparna, Tanwar Manoj

机构信息

Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Oct 5;13(10):e18497. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18497. eCollection 2021 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.18497
PMID:34754658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8569645/
Abstract

Introduction Ventricular shunting remains the standard of care for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH); however, not all patients benefit from the shunting. Prediction of response in advance can result in improved patient selection for ventricular shunting. This study aims to develop a machine learning predictive model for treatment response after shunt placement using the clinical and radiomics features. Methods In this retrospective pilot study, the medical records of iNPH patients who underwent ventricular shunting were evaluated. In each patient, the "idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus grading scale" (iNPHGS) and a "Modified Rankin Scale" were calculated before and after surgery. The subsequent treatment response was calculated as the difference between the iNPHGS scores before and after surgery. iNPHGS score reduction of two or more than two were considered as treatment response. The presurgical MRI scans were evaluated by radiologists, the ventricular systems were segmented on the T2-weighted images, and the radiomics features were extracted from the segmented ventricular system. Using Orange data mining open-source platform, different machine learning models were then developed based on the presurgical clinical features and the selected radiomics features to predict treatment response after shunt placement. Results After the implementation of the inclusion criteria, 78 patients were included in this study. One hundred twenty radiomics features were extracted, and the 12 best predictive radiomics features were selected. Using only clinical data (iNPHGS and Modified Rankin Scale), the random forest model achieved the best performance in treatment prediction with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. Adding the Radiomics analysis to the clinical data improved the prediction performance, with the support vector machine (SVM) achieving the highest rank in treatment prediction with an AUC of 0.8. Adding age and sex to the analysis did not improve the prediction. Conclusion Using machine learning models for treatment response prediction in patients with iNPH is feasible with acceptable accuracy. Adding the Radiomics analysis to the clinical features can further improve the predictive performance. SVM is likely the best model for this task.

摘要

引言 脑室分流术仍是特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者的标准治疗方法;然而,并非所有患者都能从分流术中获益。提前预测反应可改善脑室分流术的患者选择。本研究旨在利用临床和影像组学特征开发一种机器学习预测模型,用于预测分流术后的治疗反应。

方法 在这项回顾性前瞻性研究中,对接受脑室分流术的iNPH患者的病历进行了评估。在每位患者中,计算手术前后的“特发性正常压力脑积水分级量表”(iNPHGS)和“改良Rankin量表”。随后的治疗反应计算为手术前后iNPHGS评分的差值。iNPHGS评分降低两个或两个以上被视为治疗反应。放射科医生对术前MRI扫描进行评估,在T2加权图像上对脑室系统进行分割,并从分割后的脑室系统中提取影像组学特征。然后使用Orange数据挖掘开源平台,基于术前临床特征和选定的影像组学特征开发不同的机器学习模型,以预测分流术后的治疗反应。

结果 实施纳入标准后,本研究共纳入78例患者。提取了120个影像组学特征,并选择了12个最佳预测影像组学特征。仅使用临床数据(iNPHGS和改良Rankin量表)时,随机森林模型在治疗预测中表现最佳,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.71。将影像组学分析添加到临床数据中可提高预测性能,支持向量机(SVM)在治疗预测中排名最高,AUC为0.8。将年龄和性别添加到分析中并未改善预测效果。

结论 使用机器学习模型预测iNPH患者的治疗反应是可行的,准确性可接受。将影像组学分析添加到临床特征中可进一步提高预测性能。SVM可能是这项任务的最佳模型。