Suppr超能文献

青少年时期的学校类型与青年期的健康和幸福感:一项结果广泛分析。

School types in adolescence and subsequent health and well-being in young adulthood: An outcome-wide analysis.

机构信息

Human Flourishing Program, Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0258723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258723. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

While past empirical studies have explored associations between types of primary and secondary schools and student academic achievement, outcomes beyond academic performance remain less well-understood. Using longitudinal data from a cohort of children (N = 12,288, mean age = 14.56 years) of nurses, this study examined associations between the types of schools participants attended in adolescence and a wide range of subsequent psychological well-being, social engagement, character strengths, mental health, health behavior and physical health outcomes. Results in this sample suggested little difference between attending private independent schools and public schools across outcomes in young adulthood. There were, however, notable differences in subsequent outcomes comparing homeschooling and public schools, and possibly some evidence comparing religious schools and public schools. Specifically, there was some evidence that attending religious schools versus public schools was associated with a higher likelihood of frequent religious service attendance and becoming registered voters, a lower risk of overweight/obese, fewer lifetime sexual partners, and a higher risk of subsequently being binge drinkers; however, these associations were not robust to correction for multiple testing. Homeschooling compared with public schooling was associated with subsequently more frequent volunteering (ß = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.52), greater forgiveness (ß = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.16, 0.46), and more frequent religious service attendance (Risk Ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.27, 1.80), and possibly also with greater purpose in life, less marijuana use, and fewer lifetime sexual partners, but negatively associated with college degree attainment (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.88) and possibly with greater risk of posttraumatic stress disorder. These results may encourage education stakeholders to consider a wider range of outcomes beyond academic performance in decision-making.

摘要

虽然过去的实证研究探讨了小学和中学类型与学生学业成绩之间的关系,但对于学业成绩以外的结果,人们的了解仍然较少。本研究利用护士队列中儿童的纵向数据(N=12288,平均年龄=14.56 岁),研究了参与者在青春期所上学校类型与广泛的后续心理幸福感、社会参与度、性格优势、心理健康、健康行为和身体健康结果之间的关联。在本样本中,与私立独立学校和公立学校相比,青少年时期就读的学校类型与成年早期的大多数结果差异较小。然而,在家教育和公立学校之间的后续结果存在显著差异,并且在比较宗教学校和公立学校时可能存在一些证据。具体而言,有一些证据表明,与上公立学校相比,上宗教学校与更频繁地参加宗教仪式和成为注册选民、较低的超重/肥胖风险、较少的终身性伴侣以及随后成为暴饮者的风险更高有关;然而,这些关联在经过多次测试校正后并不稳健。与公立学校相比,在家教育与随后更频繁的志愿服务(β=0.33,95%CI=0.15,0.52)、更大的宽恕(β=0.31,95%CI=0.16,0.46)和更频繁地参加宗教仪式有关,并且可能与更强烈的生活目标、较少的大麻使用和较少的终身性伴侣有关,但与大学学位的获得呈负相关(RR=0.77,95%CI=0.67,0.88),并且可能与创伤后应激障碍的风险增加有关。这些结果可能鼓励教育利益相关者在决策中考虑更广泛的学业成绩以外的结果。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Web Site and R Package for Computing E-values.用于计算E值的网站和R包。
Epidemiology. 2018 Sep;29(5):e45-e47. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000864.
3
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.观察性研究中的敏感性分析:引入 E 值。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Outcome-wide Epidemiology.全结果流行病学
Epidemiology. 2017 May;28(3):399-402. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000641.
5
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.无假设的敏感性分析。
Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):368-77. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000457.
7
Validity of self-assessment of pubertal maturation.青春期成熟自评的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2015 Jan;135(1):86-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0793. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
9
Homeschooled adolescents in the United States: developmental outcomes.美国在家接受教育的青少年:发展成果。
J Adolesc. 2014 Jun;37(4):441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验