Suppr超能文献

社区医疗服务的发展:一项受限的综述。

The development of community paramedicine; a restricted review.

机构信息

Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3547-e3561. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13985. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

Abstract

Community paramedic roles are expanding internationally, and no review of the literature could be found to guide services in the formation of community paramedicine programmes. For this reason, the aim of this restricted review was to explore and better understand the successes and learnings of community paramedic programmes across five domains being; education requirements, models of delivery, clinical governance and supervision, scope of roles and outcomes. This restricted review was conducted by searching four databases (CENTRAL, ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar) as well as grey literature search from 2001 until 28/12/2021. After screening, 98 articles were included in the narrative synthesis. Most studies were from the USA (n = 37), followed by Canada (n = 29). Most studies reported on outcomes of community paramedicine programmes (n = 50), followed by models of delivery (n = 28). The findings of this review demonstrate a lack of research and understanding in the areas of education and scope of the role for community paramedics. The findings highlight a need to develop common approaches to education and scope of role while maintaining flexibility in addressing community needs. There was an observable lack of standardisation in the implementation of governance and supervision models, which may prevent community paramedicine from realising its full potential. The outcome measures reported show that there is evidence to support the implementation of community paramedicine into healthcare system design. Community paramedicine programmes result in a net reduction in acute healthcare utilisation, appear to be economically viable and result in positive patient outcomes with high patient satisfaction with care. There is a developing pool of evidence to many aspects of community paramedicine programmes. However, at this time, gaps in the literature prevent a definitive recommendation on the impact of community paramedicine programmes on healthcare system functionality.

摘要

社区急救员的角色正在国际上扩展,但没有找到文献综述来指导服务部门制定社区急救员计划。出于这个原因,本次限制审查的目的是探索和更好地了解五个领域的社区急救员计划的成功和经验教训;教育要求、交付模式、临床治理和监督、角色范围和结果。本次限制审查通过在四个数据库(CENTRAL、ERIC、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar)以及 2001 年至 2021 年 12 月 28 日的灰色文献搜索中进行搜索。经过筛选,98 篇文章被纳入叙述性综合分析。大多数研究来自美国(n=37),其次是加拿大(n=29)。大多数研究报告了社区急救员计划的结果(n=50),其次是交付模式(n=28)。本次审查的结果表明,在社区急救员的教育和角色范围方面,缺乏研究和理解。研究结果强调需要制定共同的教育和角色范围方法,同时保持灵活性以满足社区需求。在治理和监督模式的实施方面,明显缺乏标准化,这可能会阻碍社区急救员充分发挥其潜力。报告的结果衡量标准表明,有证据支持将社区急救员纳入医疗保健系统设计。社区急救员计划可显著减少急性医疗保健利用,具有经济可行性,并产生积极的患者结果和高患者对护理的满意度。有越来越多的证据表明社区急救员计划的许多方面。然而,在现阶段,文献中的空白阻止了对社区急救员计划对医疗保健系统功能的影响的明确建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebda/10087318/aa5d14e8beec/HSC-30-e3547-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验