Otto Clint R V, Bailey Larissa L, Smart Autumn H
U.S. Geological Survey Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Jamestown North Dakota USA.
Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 10;11(21):14888-14904. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8174. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Understanding habitat needs and patch utilization of wild and managed bees has been identified as a national research priority in the United States. We used occupancy models to investigate patterns of bee use across 1030 transects spanning a gradient of floral resource abundance and richness and distance from apiaries in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the United States. Estimates of transect use by honey bees were nearly 1.0 during our 3.5-month sampling period, suggesting honey bees were nearly ubiquitous across transects. Wild bees more frequently used transects with higher flower richness and more abundant flowers; however, the effect size of the native flower abundance covariate ( = 3.90 ± 0.65 [1SE]) was four times greater than the non-native flower covariate ( = 0.99 ± 0.17). We found some evidence that wild bee use was lower at transects near commercial apiaries, but the effect size was imprecise ( = 1.4 ± 0.81). Honey bees were more frequently detected during sampling events with more non-native flowers and higher species richness but showed an uncertain relationship with native flower abundance. Of the 4039 honey bee and flower interactions, 85% occurred on non-native flowers, while only 43% of the 738 wild bee observations occurred on non-native flowers. Our study suggests wild bees and honey bees routinely use the same resource patches in the PPR but often visit different flowering plants. The greatest potential for resource overlap between honey bees and wild bees appears to be for non-native flowers in the PPR. Our results are valuable to natural resource managers tasked with supporting habitat for managed and wild pollinators in agroecosystems.
了解野生蜜蜂和人工养殖蜜蜂的栖息地需求及斑块利用情况,已被确定为美国的一项国家研究重点。我们使用占用模型,调查了美国草原坑洼地区(PPR)跨越花卉资源丰度和丰富度梯度以及与养蜂场距离的1030条样带的蜜蜂利用模式。在我们3.5个月的采样期内,蜜蜂对样带的利用估计值接近1.0,这表明蜜蜂在样带中几乎无处不在。野生蜜蜂更频繁地使用花卉丰富度较高和花朵较多的样带;然而,本地花卉丰度协变量的效应大小(β = 3.90 ± 0.65 [1SE])是非本地花卉协变量(β = 0.99 ± 0.17)的四倍。我们发现一些证据表明,商业养蜂场附近样带的野生蜜蜂利用情况较低,但效应大小不精确(β = 1.4 ± 0.81)。在有更多非本地花卉和更高物种丰富度的采样事件中,更频繁地检测到蜜蜂,但蜜蜂与本地花卉丰度的关系不确定。在4039次蜜蜂与花卉的相互作用中,85%发生在非本地花卉上,而在738次野生蜜蜂观察中,只有43%发生在非本地花卉上。我们的研究表明,野生蜜蜂和蜜蜂在PPR中经常使用相同的资源斑块,但通常访问不同的开花植物。蜜蜂和野生蜜蜂之间资源重叠的最大潜力似乎在于PPR中的非本地花卉。我们的结果对负责支持农业生态系统中人工养殖和野生传粉者栖息地的自然资源管理者很有价值。