• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养殖蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂有负面影响吗?:文献系统综述

Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Mallinger Rachel E, Gaines-Day Hannah R, Gratton Claudio

机构信息

Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189268. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0189268
PMID:29220412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5722319/
Abstract

Managed bees are critical for crop pollination worldwide. As the demand for pollinator-dependent crops increases, so does the use of managed bees. Concern has arisen that managed bees may have unintended negative impacts on native wild bees, which are important pollinators in both agricultural and natural ecosystems. The goal of this study was to synthesize the literature documenting the effects of managed honey bees and bumble bees on wild bees in three areas: (1) competition for floral and nesting resources, (2) indirect effects via changes in plant communities, including the spread of exotic plants and decline of native plants, and (3) transmission of pathogens. The majority of reviewed studies reported negative effects of managed bees, but trends differed across topical areas. Of studies examining competition, results were highly variable with 53% reporting negative effects on wild bees, while 28% reported no effects and 19% reported mixed effects (varying with the bee species or variables examined). Equal numbers of studies examining plant communities reported positive (36%) and negative (36%) effects, with the remainder reporting no or mixed effects. Finally, the majority of studies on pathogen transmission (70%) reported potential negative effects of managed bees on wild bees. However, most studies across all topical areas documented the potential for impact (e.g. reporting the occurrence of competition or pathogens), but did not measure direct effects on wild bee fitness, abundance, or diversity. Furthermore, we found that results varied depending on whether managed bees were in their native or non-native range; managed bees within their native range had lesser competitive effects, but potentially greater effects on wild bees via pathogen transmission. We conclude that while this field has expanded considerably in recent decades, additional research measuring direct, long-term, and population-level effects of managed bees is needed to understand their potential impact on wild bees.

摘要

在全球范围内,人工饲养的蜜蜂对农作物授粉至关重要。随着对依赖传粉者的作物需求增加,人工饲养蜜蜂的使用也在增加。人们担心人工饲养的蜜蜂可能会对本地野生蜜蜂产生意想不到的负面影响,而本地野生蜜蜂在农业和自然生态系统中都是重要的传粉者。本研究的目的是综合文献,记录人工饲养的蜜蜂和熊蜂在三个方面对野生蜜蜂的影响:(1)对花蜜和筑巢资源的竞争;(2)通过植物群落变化产生的间接影响,包括外来植物的传播和本地植物的减少;(3)病原体的传播。大多数综述研究报告了人工饲养蜜蜂的负面影响,但不同主题领域的趋势有所不同。在研究竞争的研究中,结果差异很大,53%的研究报告对野生蜜蜂有负面影响,而28%的研究报告没有影响,19%的研究报告有混合影响(因所研究的蜜蜂种类或变量而异)。研究植物群落的研究中,报告积极影响(36%)和消极影响(36%)的数量相等,其余报告没有影响或有混合影响。最后,大多数关于病原体传播的研究(70%)报告了人工饲养蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂可能产生的负面影响。然而,所有主题领域的大多数研究都记录了影响的可能性(例如报告竞争或病原体的发生),但没有测量对野生蜜蜂健康、数量或多样性的直接影响。此外,我们发现结果因人工饲养的蜜蜂是在其原生范围还是非原生范围而异;在其原生范围内的人工饲养蜜蜂竞争影响较小,但通过病原体传播对野生蜜蜂的潜在影响可能更大。我们得出结论,虽然近几十年来这个领域有了很大的扩展,但仍需要更多研究来测量人工饲养蜜蜂的直接、长期和种群水平的影响,以了解它们对野生蜜蜂的潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/9503dffeea62/pone.0189268.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/5f4b40a0f778/pone.0189268.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/bd35f9080b54/pone.0189268.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/d8e4b6be69e7/pone.0189268.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/ff161e504c15/pone.0189268.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/15273c4e090a/pone.0189268.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/5cb43ee1fbb3/pone.0189268.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/9503dffeea62/pone.0189268.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/5f4b40a0f778/pone.0189268.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/bd35f9080b54/pone.0189268.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/d8e4b6be69e7/pone.0189268.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/ff161e504c15/pone.0189268.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/15273c4e090a/pone.0189268.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/5cb43ee1fbb3/pone.0189268.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d02f/5722319/9503dffeea62/pone.0189268.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature.养殖蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂有负面影响吗?:文献系统综述
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189268. eCollection 2017.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
6
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.成人慢性疼痛的体力活动与锻炼:Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3.
7
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the spring diet of buff-tailed bumble bees and honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a forest landscape: a metabarcoding approach.森林景观中 buff 尾熊蜂和蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)春季饮食的比较:一种宏条形码方法。
J Insect Sci. 2025 Jul 15;25(4). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaf067.
2
Monitoring Free-Living Honeybee Colonies in Germany: Insights Into Habitat Preferences, Survival Rates, and Citizen Science Reliability.德国自由生活蜂群监测:对栖息地偏好、存活率及公民科学可靠性的洞察
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):e71469. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71469. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Seasonal variation in floral resource use by a hover fly (Melangyna) (Diptera: Syrphidae) and the western honey bee (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an urban setting.

本文引用的文献

1
The structure of a plant-pollinator food web.植物-传粉者食物网的结构。
Ecol Lett. 1999 Sep;2(5):276-280. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00087.x.
2
Pathogen prevalence in commercially reared bumble bees and evidence of spillover in conspecific populations.商业养殖的熊蜂中的病原体流行情况及在同种种群中溢出的证据。
Biol Conserv. 2013 Mar;159:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.021. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
3
Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?养殖蜜蜂会促使寄生虫在野生蜜蜂中传播和出现吗?
城市环境中食蚜蝇(黑带食蚜蝇属)(双翅目:食蚜蝇科)和西方蜜蜂(意大利蜜蜂)(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)对花卉资源利用的季节变化。
J Insect Sci. 2025 May 9;25(3). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaf052.
4
A risk based pollination network for non-Apis bees demonstrates the importance of understory plant contamination.一个基于风险的非蜜蜂传粉网络表明了林下植物污染的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 25;15(1):14519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99244-w.
5
The traditional knowledge about the biodiversity of edible Brazilian fruits and their pollinators: an integrative review.关于巴西可食用水果及其传粉者生物多样性的传统知识:一项综合综述。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2025 Mar 3;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13002-025-00769-1.
6
Chemical Characterization and Antibiotic-Enhancing Activity of the Essential Oils of Propolis of .[产地]蜂胶挥发油的化学特征及抗生素增强活性
Plants (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;14(4):587. doi: 10.3390/plants14040587.
7
Predicting landscape-scale native bumble bee habitat use over space, time, and forage availability.预测景观尺度上本地熊蜂在空间、时间和食物可获得性方面对栖息地的利用情况。
Ecology. 2025 Feb;106(2):e70008. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70008.
8
Low-density migratory beekeeping induces intermediate disturbance effects on native bee communities in Tibetan Plateau alpine meadows.低密度迁徙养蜂会对青藏高原高寒草甸的本地蜜蜂群落产生中等干扰效应。
J Insect Sci. 2024 Nov 1;24(6). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae108.
9
High variability in the attractiveness of municipally-planted decorative plants to insects.市政种植的观赏性植物对昆虫的吸引力存在高度变异性。
PeerJ. 2024 Nov 6;12:e17762. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17762. eCollection 2024.
10
Strategic honey bee hive placement improves honey bee visitation but not pollination in northern highbush blueberry.在北方高丛蓝莓种植中,战略性放置蜜蜂蜂巢可提高蜜蜂的访花率,但对授粉效果并无提升。
J Econ Entomol. 2025 Feb 11;118(1):282-290. doi: 10.1093/jee/toae267.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015 Oct 28;5(1):64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.10.001. eCollection 2016 Apr.
4
Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central Europe.中欧蜜蜂与野生蜜蜂之间的资源重叠及潜在竞争
Oecologia. 2000 Feb;122(2):288-296. doi: 10.1007/s004420050034.
5
Experimental evidence that honeybees depress wild insect densities in a flowering crop.蜜蜂会降低开花作物中野生昆虫密度的实验证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1641.
6
Honey Bee Viruses in Wild Bees: Viral Prevalence, Loads, and Experimental Inoculation.野生蜜蜂中的蜜蜂病毒:病毒流行率、载量及实验接种
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166190. eCollection 2016.
7
Local bumble bee decline linked to recovery of honey bees, drought effects on floral resources.当地大黄蜂数量减少与蜜蜂数量回升、干旱对花卉资源的影响有关。
Ecol Lett. 2016 Oct;19(10):1247-55. doi: 10.1111/ele.12659. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
8
Flexible foraging shapes the topology of plant-pollinator interaction networks.灵活觅食塑造了植物-传粉者相互作用网络的拓扑结构。
Ecology. 2016 Jun;97(6):1431-41. doi: 10.1890/15-1735.1.
9
Test of the invasive pathogen hypothesis of bumble bee decline in North America.北美大黄蜂数量下降的入侵病原体假说的验证。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4386-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525266113. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
10
Native wildflower plantings support wild bee abundance and diversity in agricultural landscapes across the United States.本土野花种植有助于美国各地农业景观中野生蜜蜂数量的增加和多样性的提升。
Ecol Appl. 2015 Dec;25(8):2119-31. doi: 10.1890/14-1748.1.