Suppr超能文献

超越指责:新冠疫情时期的领导力、协作与同情心

Beyond blame: leadership, collaboration and compassion in the time of COVID-19.

作者信息

Forester John, McKibbon George

机构信息

City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.

School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.

出版信息

Socioecol Pract Res. 2020;2(3):205-216. doi: 10.1007/s42532-020-00057-0. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic confronts us with our interdependence and vulnerability, we can respond in distinctly different ways. Our fears may prompt blame and its rationalization, but our fears may also motivate inquiry and learning. Compassion and collaboration hang in the balance-shaped in part, we shall argue, by political leadership, scientific expertise, and emergent social solidarity. Blaming others may side-step responsibility, but it will not encourage or target actions in response to suffering. But admitting ignorance and the need to learn, supporting widespread testing, and following best available public health advice might cultivate broader public action and confidence-as evidenced both in exemplary public leadership and in shared actions of mutual aid like social distancing. We argue that public leadership can model and encourage-or discourage!-compassionate and collaborative action, and we examine a striking natural experiment: the parallel COVID-19 briefings of the public by President Trump's White House Task Force and New York State's Governor Andrew Cuomo. Although many of our arguments may have widespread applicability, this essay's principal perspective is primarily based upon our experiences in North America, and it is therefore American-centric to a large extent.

摘要

在新冠疫情让我们面对自身的相互依存性和脆弱性之际,我们可以有截然不同的应对方式。我们的恐惧可能引发指责及其合理化,但我们的恐惧也可能激发探究和学习。同情与合作悬于天平之上——我们认为,这在一定程度上取决于政治领导力、科学专业知识以及新出现的社会团结。指责他人可能逃避责任,但它不会鼓励针对苦难采取行动,也无法指明行动方向。然而,承认无知以及学习的必要性、支持广泛检测并遵循现有的最佳公共卫生建议,可能会培养更广泛的公众行动和信心——这在 exemplary public leadership(此处原文有误,推测可能是“exemplary public leadership”,意为“典范性的公共领导力”)以及诸如保持社交距离等互助的共同行动中都得到了体现。我们认为,公共领导力可以塑造并鼓励——或者阻碍!——富有同情心和协作性的行动,我们审视了一个引人注目的自然实验:特朗普总统的白宫特别工作组和纽约州州长安德鲁·科莫针对公众举行的平行新冠疫情简报会。尽管我们的许多观点可能具有广泛适用性,但本文的主要视角主要基于我们在北美的经历,因此在很大程度上是以美国为中心的。

相似文献

3
Pandemic solidarity: society's responses to state insufficiency.全球大流行中的团结:社会对国家应对不足的反应
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Nov;27(11):4107-4116. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320222711.11052022. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
COVID-19 pandemic, Uganda's story.新冠疫情大流行,乌干达的抗疫故事。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 May 27;35(Suppl 2):51. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.23433. eCollection 2020.
10
COVID in NYC: What We Could Do Better.纽约市的 COVID-19:我们可以做得更好。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jul;20(7):62-66. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1764146. Epub 2020 May 28.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验