Tanase Lisa-Maria, Kerr John, Freeman Alexandra L J, Schneider Claudia R
Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 3;9(8):212013. doi: 10.1098/rsos.212013. eCollection 2022 Aug.
A notable challenge of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been public scepticism over the severity of the disease, or even its existence. Such scepticism is politically skewed in the USA, with conservatives more likely to downplay or deny the risks of the virus. However, the hospitalization of President Trump with COVID-19 in October 2020 served as a high-profile exemplar of the reality and risks of the virus, and as such may have influenced opinions, particularly for US conservatives. We investigate whether President Trump testing positive was associated with changes in public attitudes towards the virus. In two studies, we surveyed independent representative US samples before and after the announcement of Trump's illness. In Study 1, measuring risk perceptions of the virus, we find that participants surveyed before and after the announcement did not differ in their risk perception regardless of political orientation. In Study 2, measuring belief that the virus is a hoax, we find that among those on the far right of the political spectrum, hoax belief was lower for those surveyed after the announcement, suggesting that Trump's hospitalization may have affected the beliefs of those most receptive to the President's earlier suggestions that the virus might be a hoax.
2019冠状病毒病大流行面临的一个显著挑战是公众对该疾病的严重程度甚至其存在表示怀疑。在美国,这种怀疑存在政治倾向,保守派更有可能淡化或否认病毒的风险。然而,2020年10月特朗普总统感染新冠病毒并住院,成为该病毒的现实和风险的一个备受瞩目的例子,因此可能影响了人们的看法,尤其是美国保守派的看法。我们调查了特朗普总统检测呈阳性是否与公众对该病毒的态度变化有关。在两项研究中,我们在宣布特朗普患病前后对具有代表性的美国独立样本进行了调查。在研究1中,我们测量了对病毒的风险认知,发现无论政治倾向如何,在宣布前后接受调查的参与者在风险认知方面没有差异。在研究2中,我们测量了认为病毒是骗局的看法,发现处于政治光谱最右端的人群中,在宣布后接受调查的人对病毒是骗局的看法有所降低,这表明特朗普住院可能影响了那些最容易接受总统早期关于病毒可能是骗局这一说法的人的看法。