Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, 14742UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Joe R. & Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, 14742UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jan;36(1):17-37. doi: 10.1177/15459683211056662. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of adult morbidity and mortality. Individuals with TBI have impairments in both cognitive and motor domains. Motor improvements post-TBI are attributable to adaptive neuroplasticity and motor learning. Majority of the studies focus on remediation of balance and mobility issues. There is limited understanding on the use of interventions for upper limb (UL) motor improvements in this population.
We examined the evidence regarding the effectiveness of different interventions to augment UL motor improvement after a TBI.
We systematically examined the evidence published in English from 1990-2020. The modified Downs and Black checklist helped assess study quality (total score: 28). Studies were classified as excellent: 24-28, good: 19-23, fair: 14-18, and poor: ≤13 in quality. Effect sizes helped quantify intervention effectiveness.
Twenty-three studies were retrieved. Study quality was excellent (n = 1), good (n = 5) or fair (n = 17). Interventions used included strategies to decrease muscle tone (n = 6), constraint induced movement therapy (n = 4), virtual reality gaming (n = 5), non-invasive stimulation (n = 3), arm motor ability training (n = 1), stem cell transplant (n = 1), task-oriented training (n = 2), and feedback provision (n = 1). Motor impairment outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Ashworth Scale, and kinematic outcomes (error and movement straightness). Activity limitation outcomes included Wolf Motor Function Test and Motor Activity Log (MAL). Effect sizes for majority of the interventions ranged from medium (.5-.79) to large (≥.8). Only ten studies included retention testing.
There is preliminary evidence that using some interventions may enhance UL motor improvement after a TBI. Answers to emergent questions can help select the most appropriate interventions in this population.
颅脑损伤(TBI)是导致成年人发病率和死亡率的主要原因。TBI 患者在认知和运动领域都存在障碍。TBI 后的运动改善归因于适应性神经可塑性和运动学习。大多数研究都集中在平衡和移动问题的矫正上。对于该人群,对于使用干预措施来改善上肢(UL)运动功能的理解有限。
我们研究了不同干预措施在 TBI 后增强 UL 运动改善的有效性证据。
我们系统地检查了 1990 年至 2020 年期间以英文发表的证据。改良的唐斯和布莱克清单有助于评估研究质量(总分:28 分)。研究质量被评为优秀(n=1)、良好(n=5)或中等(n=17)。干预措施包括降低肌肉张力的策略(n=6)、强制性运动疗法(n=4)、虚拟现实游戏(n=5)、非侵入性刺激(n=3)、手臂运动能力训练(n=1)、干细胞移植(n=1)、任务导向训练(n=2)和反馈提供(n=1)。运动障碍结局包括 Fugl-Meyer 评估、改良 Ashworth 量表和运动学结局(误差和运动直线度)。活动受限结局包括沃尔夫运动功能测试和运动活动日志(MAL)。大多数干预措施的效应大小范围从中等(.5-.79)到较大(≥.8)。只有 10 项研究包括保留测试。
有初步证据表明,使用某些干预措施可能会改善 TBI 后的 UL 运动功能。对新出现问题的回答有助于在该人群中选择最合适的干预措施。