Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Mar;198(3):254-267. doi: 10.1007/s00066-021-01873-3. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
To develop an automated treatment planning approach for whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost using an automated hybrid VMAT class solution (HVMAT).
Twenty-five consecutive patients with left breast cancer received 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to the whole breast and an additional simultaneous 10 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) to the tumor cavity. Ipsilateral lung, heart, and contralateral breast were contoured as main organs-at-risk. HVMAT plans were inversely optimized by combining two open fields with a VMAT semi-arc beam. Open fields were setup to include the whole breast with a 2 cm flash region and to carry 80% of beams weight. HVMAT plans were compared with three tangential techniques: conventional wedged-field tangential plans (SWF), field-in-field forward planned tangential plans (FiF), and hybrid-IMRT plans (HMRT). Dosimetric differences among the plans were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array.
No significant differences were found among the four techniques for both targets coverage. HVMAT plans showed consistently better PTVs dose contrast, conformity, and homogeneity (p < 0.001 for all metrics) and statistically significant reduction of high-dose breast irradiation. V55 and V60 decreased by 30.4, 26.1, and 20.8% (p < 0.05) and 12.3, 9.9, and 6.0% (p < 0.05) for SWF, FIF, and HMRT, respectively. Pretreatment dose verification reported a gamma pass-rate greater than the acceptance threshold of 95% for all HVMAT plans. In addition, HVMAT reduced the time for full planning optimization to about 20 min.
HVMAT plans resulted in superior target dose conformity and homogeneity compared to other tangential techniques. Due to fast planning time HVMAT can be applied for all patients, minimizing the impact on human or departmental resources.
开发一种使用自动化混合容积旋转调强技术(HVMAT)的全乳照射同步整合推量的自动化治疗计划方法。
连续 25 例左侧乳腺癌患者接受全乳 50Gy(2Gy/次)和肿瘤腔 10Gy(2.4Gy/次)的同步整合推量照射。同侧肺、心脏和对侧乳房被勾画为主要危及器官。通过结合两个开放野和一个 VMAT 半弧束对 HVMAT 计划进行反向优化。开放野设置包括全乳和 2cm 射野边缘区,并且承担 80%的射束权重。HVMAT 计划与三种切线技术进行比较:传统楔形野切线计划(SWF)、正向计划内野交角切线计划(FiF)和混合调强放疗计划(HMRT)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 单向方差分析评估计划之间的剂量学差异。使用 PTW Octavius-4D 体模和 1500 个 2D 阵列验证剂量准确性。
对于两个靶区的覆盖,四种技术之间没有发现显著差异。HVMAT 计划在 PTV 剂量对比度、适形度和均匀性方面始终表现更好(所有指标的 p 值均小于 0.001),并且显著降低了高剂量乳房照射。SWF、FiF 和 HMRT 中 V55 和 V60 分别降低了 30.4%、26.1%和 20.8%(p<0.05)和 12.3%、9.9%和 6.0%(p<0.05),而对于 FiF 和 HMRT 分别降低了 12.3%、9.9%和 6.0%(p<0.05)。预处理剂量验证报告所有 HVMAT 计划的伽马通过率均大于 95%的接受阈值。此外,HVMAT 将全计划优化时间减少到大约 20 分钟。
与其他切线技术相比,HVMAT 计划在靶区剂量适形度和均匀性方面表现出更好的效果。由于规划时间较快,HVMAT 可以应用于所有患者,最大程度地减少对人员或部门资源的影响。