Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cardiovascular Performance Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Physiol Rep. 2021 Nov;9(21):e15105. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15105.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) guidelines recommend analysis of the oxygen (O ) pulse for a late exercise plateau in evaluation for obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD). However, whether this O pulse trajectory is within the range of normal has been debated, and the diagnostic performance of the O pulse for OCAD in physically fit individuals, in whom may be more likely to plateau, has not been evaluated. Using prospectively collected data from a sports cardiology program, patients were identified who were free of other cardiac disease and underwent clinically-indicated CPET within 90 days of invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography. The diagnostic performance of quantitative O pulse metrics (late exercise slope, proportional change in slope during late exercise) and qualitative assessment for O pulse plateau to predict OCAD was assessed. Among 104 patients (age:56 ± 12 years, 30% female, peak 119 ± 34% predicted), the diagnostic performance for OCAD (n = 24,23%) was poor for both quantitative and qualitative metrics reflecting an O pulse plateau (late exercise slope: AUC = 0.55, sensitivity = 68%, specificity = 41%; proportional change in slope: AUC = 0.55, sensitivity = 91%, specificity = 18%; visual plateau/decline: AUC = 0.51, sensitivity = 33%, specificity = 67%). When O pulse parameters were added to the electrocardiogram, the change in AUC was minimal (-0.01 to +0.02, p ≥ 0.05). Those patients without OCAD with a plateau or decline in O pulse were fitter than those with linear augmentation (peak 133 ± 31% vs. 114 ± 36% predicted, p < 0.05) and had a longer exercise ramp time (9.5 ± 3.2 vs. 8.0 ± 2.5 min, p < 0.05). Overall, a plateau in O pulse was not a useful predictor of OCAD in a physically fit population, indicating that the O pulse should be integrated with other CPET parameters and may reflect a physiologic limitation of stroke volume and/or O extraction during intense exercise.
心肺运动测试(CPET)指南建议分析氧气(O )脉搏以评估阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(OCAD)的运动后期平台。然而,这种 O 脉搏轨迹是否在正常范围内一直存在争议,并且在身体状况良好的个体中,O 脉搏对 OCAD 的诊断性能,在这些个体中,可能更容易出现平台,尚未得到评估。本研究使用前瞻性收集的运动心脏病学计划数据,筛选出在 90 天内行侵入性或计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影的无其他心脏疾病且临床指征明确的 CPET 患者。评估定量 O 脉搏指标(运动后期斜率、运动后期斜率的比例变化)和 O 脉搏平台的定性评估对 OCAD 的预测价值。在 104 名患者(年龄:56±12 岁,30%为女性,峰值 119±34%预测值)中,两种定量和定性指标(运动后期斜率:AUC=0.55,敏感性=68%,特异性=41%;斜率的比例变化:AUC=0.55,敏感性=91%,特异性=18%;视觉平台/下降:AUC=0.51,敏感性=33%,特异性=67%)对 OCAD(n=24,23%)的诊断性能均较差,反映出 O 脉搏平台。当 O 脉搏参数添加到心电图时,AUC 的变化最小(-0.01 至+0.02,p≥0.05)。那些没有 OCAD 且 O 脉搏出现平台或下降的患者比那些 O 脉搏呈线性增加的患者更健康(峰值 133±31% vs. 114±36%预测值,p<0.05),运动斜坡时间更长(9.5±3.2 vs. 8.0±2.5 分钟,p<0.05)。总的来说,在身体状况良好的人群中,O 脉搏平台并不是 OCAD 的有用预测指标,这表明 O 脉搏应该与其他 CPET 参数结合使用,并且可能反映出在剧烈运动期间每搏量和/或 O 提取的生理限制。