Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Jan 5;53(1):88-103. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00064. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between functional communication skills, underlying speech, language, and cognitive impairments and school-based speech pathology services in students with cerebral palsy (CP).
Thirty-five participants with CP who had Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) were classified according to the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS). Participants completed laboratory assessments of speech, receptive language, executive functioning, and nonverbal cognition. Each participant's speech and language IEP goals were coded into treatment units and then categorized into seven, mutually exclusive target goal areas. Nonparametric analyses were employed to examine differences among CFCS groups in the number of deficit areas and the number of goal areas from the IEP. Descriptive analyses were used to evaluate the extent to which deficit and goal areas in the IEP co-occurred by CFCS level.
Those in more involved CFCS levels demonstrated more severe speech, receptive language, and cognitive impairments. However, there were no significant differences in the number of deficit areas across CFCS groups. Regardless of CFCS level, there were no differences in the number of treatment goals specified in the IEP. Literacy was the only goal area addressed across all CFCS levels. Those in the most involved CFCS levels had augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) goals, but those with more moderate restrictions in functional communication who also had markedly reduced speech intelligibility did not typically have speech or AAC goals.
Individuals with CP across CFCS levels demonstrate variability in underlying deficit profiles, suggesting that measures of both functional communication and of underlying deficits are necessary to provide a complete picture of communication needs. Literacy goals were common across all CFCS levels, but AAC goals were limited to the most severely involved individuals, suggesting that continuing education may be necessary to support speech-language pathologists in developing treatments involving the integration of AAC and speech to foster functional communication at school.
本研究旨在探讨脑瘫(CP)患者的功能性沟通技能、潜在言语、语言和认知障碍与学校言语病理学服务之间的关系。
根据沟通功能分类系统(CFCS)对 35 名有个体化教育计划(IEP)的 CP 患者进行分类。参与者完成了言语、接受性语言、执行功能和非言语认知的实验室评估。每位参与者的言语和语言 IEP 目标被编码为治疗单元,并分为七个相互排斥的目标领域。采用非参数分析来检查 CFCS 组在缺陷领域数量和 IEP 目标领域数量上的差异。描述性分析用于评估 IEP 中的缺陷和目标领域在 CFCS 水平上的共存程度。
处于更严重 CFCS 水平的患者表现出更严重的言语、接受性语言和认知障碍。然而,CFCS 组之间的缺陷领域数量没有显著差异。无论 CFCS 水平如何,IEP 中指定的治疗目标数量都没有差异。读写能力是所有 CFCS 水平都涉及的唯一目标领域。处于最严重 CFCS 水平的患者有辅助和替代沟通(AAC)目标,但那些在功能沟通方面受到更中度限制且言语清晰度明显降低的患者通常没有言语或 AAC 目标。
CFCS 水平不同的 CP 患者表现出潜在缺陷特征的可变性,这表明需要同时测量功能性沟通和潜在缺陷,以全面了解沟通需求。读写能力目标在所有 CFCS 水平都很常见,但 AAC 目标仅限于最严重的患者,这表明需要继续教育,以支持言语语言病理学家制定涉及 AAC 和言语整合的治疗方法,以促进学校的功能性沟通。