Turner Luke, Bewick Bridgette M, Kent Sarah, Khyabani Azaria, Bryant Louise, Summers Barbara
Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Leeds Institute for Teaching Excellence, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;18(21):11149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111149.
Despite the benefits of the internet and other digital technology, the online world has been associated with a negative impact on university student wellbeing. Many university students report symptoms of pathological internet use. Internationally, further research is needed to understand what student users of technology perceive to be problematic internet and/or digital use. The current study explores the range of perceptions that university students hold about 'digital addiction'. We recruited 33 participants from a UK university into a Q-methodology study. Participants sorted, ranked, and commented on fifty-two statements representing the concourse of 'things written or said about digital addiction'. The statements were identified from a comprehensive search of a wide variety of sources (e.g., newspapers, academic articles, blogs, and YouTube). Principal Component Analysis was used to identify four distinct viewpoints of 'digital addiction': (I) digital addiction is differentiated by the negative consequences experienced by addicted individuals; (II) digital addiction comes from our fascination with the online world; (III) digital addiction is an attempt to escape real world problems and impacts on mental health and relationships; (IV) digital addiction is defined by the amount of time we spend online. All four viewpoints share the perception that people do not realize they are digitally addicted because using and having digital devices on you at all times has become the social norm. There was also overall agreement that that those with 'addictive personalities' were more likely to be 'digitally addicted'. Despite these similarities, complexity and contradictions within the viewpoints surrounding what digital addiction is and how it might be defined are apparent. The information found in this study provides important suggestions of how we might frame prevention and early intervention messages to engage students and ensure they develop the skills necessary to successfully manage their digital lives.
尽管互联网和其他数字技术带来了诸多益处,但网络世界却与大学生的幸福感产生了负面影响。许多大学生报告出现了病理性网络使用的症状。在国际上,还需要进一步研究,以了解技术的学生用户认为哪些网络和/或数字使用存在问题。当前的研究探讨了大学生对“数字成瘾”的各种看法。我们从英国一所大学招募了33名参与者,进行了一项Q方法研究。参与者对代表“关于数字成瘾的书面或言论”集合的52条陈述进行了分类、排序和评论。这些陈述是通过对各种来源(如报纸、学术文章、博客和YouTube)的全面搜索确定的。主成分分析用于确定“数字成瘾”的四种不同观点:(I)数字成瘾通过成瘾个体所经历的负面后果来区分;(II)数字成瘾源于我们对网络世界的迷恋;(III)数字成瘾是试图逃避现实世界的问题以及对心理健康和人际关系的影响;(IV)数字成瘾由我们上网的时间量来定义。所有这四种观点都认为,人们没有意识到自己数字成瘾,因为随时使用和携带数字设备已成为社会规范。大家还普遍认为,具有“成瘾人格”的人更有可能“数字成瘾”。尽管存在这些相似之处,但围绕数字成瘾是什么以及如何定义的观点中,复杂性和矛盾依然明显。本研究中发现的信息为我们如何构建预防和早期干预信息以吸引学生并确保他们培养成功管理数字生活所需技能提供了重要建议。