• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用数字监控识别加州另类和新兴烟草业在 Facebook 上的政策影响和动员

Digital Surveillance to Identify California Alternative and Emerging Tobacco Industry Policy Influence and Mobilization on Facebook.

机构信息

Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

S-3 Research, LLC, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;18(21):11150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111150.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111150
PMID:34769666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583030/
Abstract

Growing popularity of electronic nicotine-delivery systems (ENDS) has coincided with a need to strengthen tobacco-control policy. In response, the ENDS industry has taken actions to mobilize against public health measures, including coordination on social media platforms. To explore this phenomenon, data mining was used to collect public posts on two Facebook public group pages: the California Consumer Advocates for Smoke Free Alternatives Association (CCASAA) and the community page of the Northern California Chapter of SFATA (NC-SFATA). Posts were manually annotated to characterize themes associated with industry political interference and user interaction. We collected 288 posts from the NC-SFATA and 411 posts from CCASAA. A total of 522 (74.7%) posts were categorized as a form of political interference, with 339 posts (64.9%) from CCASAA and 183 posts (35.1%) from NC-SFATA. We identified three different categories of policy interference-related posts: (1) providing updates on ENDS-related policy at the federal, state, and local levels; (2) sharing opinions about ENDS-related policies; (3) posts related to scientific information related to vaping; and (4) calls to action to mobilize against tobacco/ENDS policies. Our findings indicate that pro-tobacco social media communities on Facebook, driven by strategic activities of trade associations and their members, may act as focal points for anti-policy information dissemination, grass-roots mobilization, and industry coordination that needs further research.

摘要

电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的日益普及恰逢加强烟草控制政策的需要。作为回应,ENDS 行业采取了行动,以动员反对公共卫生措施,包括在社交媒体平台上协调。为了探索这一现象,我们使用数据挖掘收集了两个 Facebook 公共群组页面上的公共帖子:加利福尼亚消费者倡导无烟替代品协会(CCASAA)和 SFATA 北加州分会的社区页面(NC-SFATA)。对帖子进行了手动注释,以描述与行业政治干预和用户互动相关的主题。我们从 NC-SFATA 收集了 288 个帖子,从 CCASAA 收集了 411 个帖子。共有 522 个(74.7%)帖子被归类为某种形式的政治干预,其中 CCASAA 有 339 个帖子(64.9%),NC-SFATA 有 183 个帖子(35.1%)。我们确定了三类与政策干预相关的帖子:(1)提供有关联邦、州和地方各级 ENDS 相关政策的最新信息;(2)分享有关 ENDS 相关政策的意见;(3)与蒸气相关的科学信息的帖子;以及(4)呼吁采取行动反对烟草/ENDS 政策。我们的研究结果表明,由贸易协会及其成员的战略活动驱动的 Facebook 上的亲烟草社交媒体社区,可能成为反政策信息传播、基层动员和行业协调的焦点,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/8583030/c9ae85c27c48/ijerph-18-11150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/8583030/5f1b9a8297c3/ijerph-18-11150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/8583030/c9ae85c27c48/ijerph-18-11150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/8583030/5f1b9a8297c3/ijerph-18-11150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/8583030/c9ae85c27c48/ijerph-18-11150-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Surveillance to Identify California Alternative and Emerging Tobacco Industry Policy Influence and Mobilization on Facebook.利用数字监控识别加州另类和新兴烟草业在 Facebook 上的政策影响和动员
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;18(21):11150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111150.
2
Characterizing Vaping Industry Political Influence and Mobilization on Facebook: Social Network Analysis. characterizes vaping industry political influence and mobilization on Facebook: social network analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 29;23(10):e28069. doi: 10.2196/28069.
3
Industry response to strengthened regulations: amount and themes of flavoured electronic cigarette promotion by product vendors and manufacturers on Instagram.行业对加强监管的反应:产品销售商和制造商在 Instagram 上推广调味电子烟的数量和主题。
Tob Control. 2022 Nov;31(Suppl 3):s249-s254. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057490.
4
Electronic Cigarette-Related Contents on Instagram: Observational Study and Exploratory Analysis.Instagram 上电子烟相关内容:观察性研究与探索性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 5;6(4):e21963. doi: 10.2196/21963.
5
How Facebook is used to promote ENDS products near four Big 10 universities: A qualitative analysis.脸书(Facebook)如何在十大联盟(Big 10)附近的四所大学附近推广电子烟:一项定性分析。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jan;72(1):210-218. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2027425. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Applying topic modelling and qualitative content analysis to identify and characterise ENDS product promotion and sales on Instagram.运用主题建模和定性内容分析来识别和描述 Instagram 上电子烟产品的促销和销售情况。
Tob Control. 2023 Aug;32(e2):e153-e159. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056937. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Marketing Content on E-Cigarette Brand-Sponsored Facebook Profile Pages.电子烟品牌赞助的 Facebook 个人资料页面上的营销内容。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(4):442-448. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1878223. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
8
E-Cigarette Advocates on Twitter: Content Analysis of Vaping-Related Tweets.电子烟倡导者在推特上:与蒸汽相关的推文的内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 14;6(4):e17543. doi: 10.2196/17543.
9
Vaping and Instagram: A Content Analysis of e-Cigarette Posts Using the Content Appealing to Youth (CAY) Index.吸电子烟和 Instagram:使用吸引年轻人内容(CAY)指数对电子烟帖子进行的内容分析。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(6):879-887. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1899233. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
Determining the prevalence of cannabis, tobacco, and vaping device mentions in online communities using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术确定在线社区中关于大麻、烟草和蒸气设备的提及率。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109016. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109016. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco control policies discussed on social media: a scoping review.社交媒体上讨论的烟草控制政策:一项范围综述
Tob Control. 2024 Oct 26. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058824.
2
Detecting nuance in conspiracy discourse: Advancing methods in infodemiology and communication science with machine learning and qualitative content coding.检测阴谋话语中的细微差别:用机器学习和定性内容编码推进信息流行病学和传播学方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0295414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295414. eCollection 2023.
3
The application of artificial intelligence in health policy: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Chemical analysis of fresh and aged Australian e-cigarette liquids.新鲜和陈化的澳大利亚电子烟液的化学分析。
Med J Aust. 2022 Jan 17;216(1):27-32. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51280. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
E-cigarettes compromise the gut barrier and trigger inflammation.电子烟会损害肠道屏障并引发炎症。
iScience. 2021 Jan 6;24(2):102035. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102035. eCollection 2021 Feb 19.
3
#FlavorsSaveLives: An Analysis of Twitter Posts Opposing Flavored E-cigarette Bans.#FlavorsSaveLives:反对调味电子烟禁令的 Twitter 帖子分析。
人工智能在卫生政策中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):1416. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10462-2.
4
Impact of Vaping on Lungs: An Indian Prospect.电子烟对肺部的影响:印度的前景
Cureus. 2023 Nov 4;15(11):e48281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48281. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1431-1435. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa276.
4
What to do when tobacco advertisers exploit antitobacco social media campaigns to sell tobacco.当烟草广告商利用反烟草社交媒体活动来推销烟草时该怎么办。
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):243-244. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054993. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
The Messages Presented in Electronic Cigarette-Related Social Media Promotions and Discussion: Scoping Review.电子烟相关社交媒体推广和讨论中呈现的信息:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 5;21(2):e11953. doi: 10.2196/11953.
6
Youth access to JUUL online: eBay sales of JUUL prior to and following FDA action.青少年获取 JUUL 电子烟的途径:FDA 采取行动前后,eBay 上 JUUL 的销售情况。
Tob Control. 2019 Nov;28(6):617-622. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054499. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Characterizing JUUL-related posts on Twitter.分析推特上与 JUUL 相关的帖子。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
8
Marketing IQOS in a dark market.在黑市上推销 IQOS。
Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):237-238. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054216. Epub 2018 May 3.
9
Promotion of tobacco products on Facebook: policy versus practice.脸书上推销烟草制品:政策与实践相悖。
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):67-73. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054175. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
A picture is worth a thousand words: Electronic cigarette content on Instagram and Pinterest.一图胜千言:Instagram和Pinterest上的电子烟内容。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2017 Jul;3. doi: 10.18332/tpc/74709. Epub 2017 Jul 3.