Suppr超能文献

利用数字监控识别加州另类和新兴烟草业在 Facebook 上的政策影响和动员

Digital Surveillance to Identify California Alternative and Emerging Tobacco Industry Policy Influence and Mobilization on Facebook.

机构信息

Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

S-3 Research, LLC, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;18(21):11150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111150.

Abstract

Growing popularity of electronic nicotine-delivery systems (ENDS) has coincided with a need to strengthen tobacco-control policy. In response, the ENDS industry has taken actions to mobilize against public health measures, including coordination on social media platforms. To explore this phenomenon, data mining was used to collect public posts on two Facebook public group pages: the California Consumer Advocates for Smoke Free Alternatives Association (CCASAA) and the community page of the Northern California Chapter of SFATA (NC-SFATA). Posts were manually annotated to characterize themes associated with industry political interference and user interaction. We collected 288 posts from the NC-SFATA and 411 posts from CCASAA. A total of 522 (74.7%) posts were categorized as a form of political interference, with 339 posts (64.9%) from CCASAA and 183 posts (35.1%) from NC-SFATA. We identified three different categories of policy interference-related posts: (1) providing updates on ENDS-related policy at the federal, state, and local levels; (2) sharing opinions about ENDS-related policies; (3) posts related to scientific information related to vaping; and (4) calls to action to mobilize against tobacco/ENDS policies. Our findings indicate that pro-tobacco social media communities on Facebook, driven by strategic activities of trade associations and their members, may act as focal points for anti-policy information dissemination, grass-roots mobilization, and industry coordination that needs further research.

摘要

电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的日益普及恰逢加强烟草控制政策的需要。作为回应,ENDS 行业采取了行动,以动员反对公共卫生措施,包括在社交媒体平台上协调。为了探索这一现象,我们使用数据挖掘收集了两个 Facebook 公共群组页面上的公共帖子:加利福尼亚消费者倡导无烟替代品协会(CCASAA)和 SFATA 北加州分会的社区页面(NC-SFATA)。对帖子进行了手动注释,以描述与行业政治干预和用户互动相关的主题。我们从 NC-SFATA 收集了 288 个帖子,从 CCASAA 收集了 411 个帖子。共有 522 个(74.7%)帖子被归类为某种形式的政治干预,其中 CCASAA 有 339 个帖子(64.9%),NC-SFATA 有 183 个帖子(35.1%)。我们确定了三类与政策干预相关的帖子:(1)提供有关联邦、州和地方各级 ENDS 相关政策的最新信息;(2)分享有关 ENDS 相关政策的意见;(3)与蒸气相关的科学信息的帖子;以及(4)呼吁采取行动反对烟草/ENDS 政策。我们的研究结果表明,由贸易协会及其成员的战略活动驱动的 Facebook 上的亲烟草社交媒体社区,可能成为反政策信息传播、基层动员和行业协调的焦点,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/8583030/5f1b9a8297c3/ijerph-18-11150-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验