Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(4):442-448. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1878223. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
E-cigarettes are marketed on brand-sponsored Facebook profile pages despite Facebook's policy to prohibit e-cigarette marketing on their platform. We aimed to identify e-cigarette marketing strategies used and products marketed on brand-sponsored Facebook profiles and assess whether these strategies and featured products differ by user engagement.
We examined up to 10 recent Facebook posts on 26 e-cigarette brand-sponsored profile pages uploaded between August 1 and November 31, 2016. We identified positive engagement (i.e. "like," "love"), negative engagement (i.e. "sad," "angry"), post type (e.g. link, photo), type of sales promotion (e.g. giveaways, discounts), non-sales promotion (e.g. event promotion without product marketing), and marketed products (e.g. e-cigarettes, e-liquids).
We examined 225 Facebook posts. Engagement was modest (e.g. Median "likes" = 8 [Min = 0, Max = 591]). The most common post types were photos (52.6%) and links (35.5%). Of all links, 83.7% were links to online shops. Of all posts, 35.0% had overt sales promotional content, 32.0% featured non-sales promotional content, and 68.0% featured an e-cigarette product. The most commonly featured product was an e-cigarette device (50.6%). Posts with more positive engagement included giveaways (versus sales [ = 0.009]) and posts marketing vaping devices (versus e-liquids [ = 0.004)]). Negative engagement was not associated with marketing strategies or products. Of the brand-sponsored profile pages, 42.3% could be accessed by underage users.
E-cigarettes are marketed on Facebook using a variety of promotional strategies. Importantly, underage youth often can access this marketing content. Comprehensive tobacco control policies that restrict e-cigarette marketing on social media are needed urgently.
尽管 Facebook 有禁止电子烟在其平台上做广告的政策,但电子烟仍在品牌赞助的 Facebook 个人资料页面上做广告。我们旨在确定在品牌赞助的 Facebook 个人资料上使用的电子烟营销策略和推广的产品,并评估这些策略和特色产品是否因用户参与度而有所不同。
我们检查了 2016 年 8 月 1 日至 11 月 31 日期间上传的 26 个电子烟品牌赞助个人资料页面上的最近 10 个 Facebook 帖子。我们确定了积极的参与度(即“点赞”、“喜欢”)、消极的参与度(即“难过”、“生气”)、帖子类型(如链接、照片)、销售促进类型(如赠品、折扣)、非销售促进(如没有产品营销的活动推广)和推广的产品(如电子烟、电子烟液)。
我们检查了 225 个 Facebook 帖子。参与度适中(例如,中位数“点赞”=8[最小值=0,最大值=591])。最常见的帖子类型是照片(52.6%)和链接(35.5%)。在所有链接中,83.7%是指向在线商店的链接。在所有帖子中,35.0%有明显的销售促销内容,32.0%有非销售促销内容,68.0%有电子烟产品。最常推广的产品是电子烟设备(50.6%)。有更多积极参与度的帖子包括赠品(与销售相比[=0.009])和推广电子烟设备的帖子(与电子烟液相比[=0.004]))。消极参与度与营销策略或产品无关。在品牌赞助的个人资料页面中,42.3%可以被未成年用户访问。
Facebook 上使用了各种促销策略来推广电子烟。重要的是,未成年青少年经常可以访问这些营销内容。急需制定全面的烟草控制政策,限制社交媒体上的电子烟营销。