• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于微信的中国烟民戒烟项目的实施。

Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers.

机构信息

Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92122, USA.

Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70122, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;18(21):11189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111189.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111189
PMID:34769707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583318/
Abstract

Although smoking prevalence has recently declined, the smoking prevalence in China remains high. Extensive research has demonstrated ways that social media can assist in quitting smoking. WeChat is the most commonly used social media platform in China but has not been used for smoking cessation. A process evaluation of a novel WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention was conducted to measure its efficacy of content delivery, participant satisfaction, engagement, and likelihood of recommendation to others. A three-week, three-arm, single-blind randomized control trial was established. WeChat was used to recruit 403 participants and to deliver intervention messages and process evaluation surveys to them. Recruitment advertisements were posted on an official WeChat account and were forwarded to WeChat Moments. Intervention messages were delivered once a day during weekdays, using the WeChat broadcasting messages function, with two messages being sent each time. Process evaluation surveys were organized using Wenjuanwang and were delivered via WeChat. Process assessments were conducted every Friday to assess intervention message receipt, satisfaction level, engagement level, and recommendation to others. The receipt of intervention messages was measured by a self-reported question indicating which messages were read each week. Satisfaction was measured by a five-item Likert scale survey. Engagement was measured by a one-item Likert scale survey. Recommendation to others was measured by one self-reported question. Participants read an average of 4.76 (out of 10), 5.80 (out of 10), and 4.25 (out of 6) messages at week 1, week 2, and week 3, respectively. The second messages were less likely to be read compared to the first messages (52.3% vs. 61.6%, respectively). Moreover, within each single week, the number of participants who read the intervention messages gradually decreases over time. Picture-based intervention messages tended to be less likely to be read than video-based intervention messages. Total program satisfaction scores ranged between 5 and 25, and the overall scores for satisfaction for each week were 21.55, 22.27, and 22.76, respectively. No significant differences were found in all the satisfaction indicators between groups. More than 60% of participants reported being either highly engaged or somewhat engaged each week. In addition, most participants (93.0% at week 1, 95.8% at week 2, and 96.2% at week 3) reported that they were willing to recommend our program to others. A WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention for Chinese smokers was implemented and evaluated. For future studies, one should consider sending messages of a higher importance as the first message of a given day. Smokers had a higher rate of reading intervention messages at the beginning part of each week, during which, relatively important messages should be prioritized. One might also consider alternating the topics and formats of the messages for a better engagement of the users in future studies.

摘要

尽管吸烟率最近有所下降,但中国的吸烟率仍然很高。大量研究表明,社交媒体可以帮助戒烟。微信是中国最常用的社交媒体平台,但尚未用于戒烟。我们对一种基于微信的新型戒烟干预措施进行了过程评估,以衡量其内容传递、参与者满意度、参与度和向他人推荐的可能性。

我们进行了为期 3 周、3 臂、单盲随机对照试验。我们使用微信招募了 403 名参与者,并向他们发送干预信息和过程评估调查。招募广告发布在一个官方微信账号上,并转发到微信朋友圈。工作日每天发送一次干预信息,使用微信广播消息功能,每次发送两条消息。过程评估调查使用问卷星组织,并通过微信发送。每周五进行过程评估,评估干预信息的接收、满意度、参与度和向他人推荐情况。干预信息的接收情况通过自我报告的问题来衡量,即参与者每周阅读了哪些信息。满意度通过 5 项李克特量表调查进行衡量。参与度通过 1 项李克特量表调查进行衡量。向他人推荐情况通过一个自我报告的问题来衡量。

参与者在第 1 周、第 2 周和第 3 周分别阅读了 4.76(满分 10 分)、5.80(满分 10 分)和 4.25(满分 6 分)的信息。第二组信息的阅读率低于第一组信息(分别为 52.3%和 61.6%)。此外,在每周内,随着时间的推移,阅读干预信息的参与者人数逐渐减少。基于图片的干预信息比基于视频的干预信息更不容易被阅读。总方案满意度评分范围为 5 到 25 分,每周的总体满意度评分为 21.55、22.27 和 22.76。组间在所有满意度指标上均无显著差异。每周都有超过 60%的参与者表示高度参与或有些参与。此外,大多数参与者(第 1 周为 93.0%,第 2 周为 95.8%,第 3 周为 96.2%)表示愿意向他人推荐我们的方案。

我们实施并评估了一种针对中国吸烟者的基于微信的戒烟干预措施。对于未来的研究,我们应该考虑在每天的第一条消息中发送更重要的消息。吸烟者在每周开始时更倾向于阅读干预信息,在此期间,应该优先考虑相对重要的信息。在未来的研究中,我们还可以考虑交替消息的主题和格式,以更好地吸引用户的参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8583318/045d041026a7/ijerph-18-11189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8583318/df247e48931b/ijerph-18-11189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8583318/045d041026a7/ijerph-18-11189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8583318/df247e48931b/ijerph-18-11189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8583318/045d041026a7/ijerph-18-11189-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Program for Chinese Smokers.基于微信的中国烟民戒烟项目的实施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;18(21):11189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111189.
2
A WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention for Chinese smokers: a feasibility study.基于微信的戒烟干预措施对中国吸烟者的影响:一项可行性研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 16;12(10):1018-1027. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac067.
3
Mobile Social Network-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Chinese Male Smokers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于移动社交网络的中国男性吸烟者戒烟干预:初步随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 23;8(10):e17522. doi: 10.2196/17522.
4
Urban and Rural Disparities in a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention among Chinese Smokers.基于微信的中国吸烟者戒烟干预的城乡差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;18(13):6731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136731.
5
Effectiveness of the WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention ('WeChat WeQuit' program) in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于微信的戒烟干预(“微信戒烟”项目)在中国的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1279-1290. doi: 10.1111/add.15166. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Development of a WeChat-based Mobile Messaging Smoking Cessation Intervention for Chinese Immigrant Smokers: Qualitative Interview Study.为中国移民吸烟者开发基于微信的移动消息戒烟干预措施:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 30;6(6):e36091. doi: 10.2196/36091.
7
Assessment of a Text Message-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Adult Smokers in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于短信的戒烟干预措施对中国成年吸烟者的评估:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e230301. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0301.
8
Efficacy of WeChat-based online smoking cessation intervention ('WeChat WeQuit') in China: a randomised controlled trial.基于微信的在线戒烟干预措施(“微信戒烟宝”)在中国的效果:一项随机对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 May 18;60:102009. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102009. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
A WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention for Chinese smokers: A pilot study.一项针对中国吸烟者的基于微信的戒烟干预措施:一项试点研究。
Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 23;28:100511. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100511. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Adaptation and Assessment of a Text Messaging Smoking Cessation Intervention in Vietnam: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.在越南对短信戒烟干预措施进行调整和评估: 试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 8;9(10):e27478. doi: 10.2196/27478.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Social Media-Based Peer-Group Mobile Messaging Smoking Cessation Intervention Among Chinese Immigrants who Smoke: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于社交媒体的同伴群体手机短信戒烟干预在吸烟的中国移民中的可行性和初步效果: 试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jul 22;12:e59496. doi: 10.2196/59496.
2
WeChat official accounts' posts on medication use of 251 community healthcare centers in Shanghai, China: content analysis and quality assessment.中国上海251家社区卫生服务中心微信公众号用药相关推文:内容分析与质量评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 12;10:1155428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1155428. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of a social media-based weight loss intervention designed for low-SES adults.基于社交媒体的针对低收入成年人的减肥干预措施的可行性。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Apr 26;11(4):981-992. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa070.
2
Using social media for smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review.利用社交媒体进行戒烟干预:一项系统综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2021 Jan;141(1):50-63. doi: 10.1177/1757913920906845. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Oral health in China: from vision to action.中国口腔健康:愿景至行动。
Efficacy of WeChat-based online smoking cessation intervention ('WeChat WeQuit') in China: a randomised controlled trial.
基于微信的在线戒烟干预措施(“微信戒烟宝”)在中国的效果:一项随机对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 May 18;60:102009. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102009. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
The effect of anxiety and depression on the health-related quality of life of severe acute pancreatitis survivors: structural equation modeling approach.焦虑和抑郁对重症急性胰腺炎幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响:结构方程模型方法
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 2;14:1160807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160807. eCollection 2023.
5
A WeChat-based smoking cessation intervention for Chinese smokers: A pilot study.一项针对中国吸烟者的基于微信的戒烟干预措施:一项试点研究。
Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 23;28:100511. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100511. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Int J Oral Sci. 2018 Jan 17;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41368-017-0006-6.
4
Systematic review of social media interventions for smoking cessation.社交媒体戒烟干预措施的系统评价
Addict Behav. 2017 Oct;73:81-93. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Trends in smoking prevalence and attributable mortality in China, 1991-2011.1991 - 2011年中国吸烟流行趋势及归因死亡率
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Higher stimulus control is associated with less cigarette intake in daily smokers.更高的刺激控制与每日吸烟者较少的香烟摄入量相关。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Mar;30(2):229-37. doi: 10.1037/adb0000149. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Development of a Twitter-based intervention for smoking cessation that encourages high-quality social media interactions via automessages.开发一种基于推特的戒烟干预措施,通过自动消息鼓励高质量的社交媒体互动。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 23;17(2):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3772.
8
Oral health in China--trends and challenges.中国的口腔健康——趋势与挑战。
Int J Oral Sci. 2011 Jan;3(1):7-12. doi: 10.4248/IJOS11006.
9
Avoidable global cancer deaths and total deaths from smoking.可避免的全球癌症死亡人数及吸烟导致的总死亡人数。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Sep;9(9):655-64. doi: 10.1038/nrc2703. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
10
A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report.《治疗烟草使用和依赖的临床实践指南:2008年更新版》。美国公共卫生服务部报告。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009.